- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: OT PHOTOGRAPHERS: Sony, Canon, or Nikon? Help me pick a new camera
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Big issue with full frame is cost and range of available lenses
While cost might be an issue, what lenses are you talking about that are available for APS-C that aren't available for full frame? I find it's usually the opposite
1
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:56 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
My everyday camera is a Fuji XT-20 mirrorless
The Fuji Xt-x0 series is the best budget camera out there. I prefer the main like of cameras myself but the only real disadvantage of the budget models is weather resistance which isn't an issue for most people.
The Fuji "kit lenses" are far superior to Nikon, Canon and Sony Kit lenses.
Olympus and Panasonic aren't bad if you don't mind the smaller sensors but I wouldn't depend on them for low light stuff.
This post was edited on 4/8/20 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:06 pm to Pettifogger
I've used both professionally, bud. I don't give a frick what you think of my post.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:07 pm to LSUgusto
quote:
I've used both professionally, bud. I don't give a frick what you think of my post.
No you haven't
Or you're the worst pro photographer on earth
"Nikon has a ton of built in features" - I mean FFS
This post was edited on 4/8/20 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:09 pm to OldManRiver
quote:
While cost might be an issue, what lenses are you talking about that are available for APS-C that aren't available for full frame? I find it's usually the opposite
There are a lot more options, specifically third party for crop sensors in almost any brand.
This post was edited on 4/8/20 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:24 pm to Vincent van Goat
AntiqueTiger is the one person to listen to in this thread. He’s posted some pretty amazing pictures he has taken over the years.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:27 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Nikon has a ton of built in features" - I mean FFS
Some of the Sony cameras are electronic devices that double as cameras. Mostly menu based.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:39 pm to theantiquetiger
quote:
theantiquetiger
Listen to this man. He knows what he's talking about. Why he got downvotes is beyond me.
Nikon or Canon would be the way to go if you want to get really serious.
Canon gear is about 10%-25% less expensive when it comes to lenses (at least it was when I was buying gear like a drunken sailor). Third party lenses (Tamron, Sigma, Tokina) are also very good and much cheaper, but there is a difference in quality. If you are making a living with your photography, that extra 5%-10% in quality is worth the extra $1000 or more dollars for a OEM lens.
However, each system has its own pros and cons. From what I remember, Nikon lenses are a touch more crisp and clear, but Canon cameras have better autofocus and are a touch faster. I think Nikons are a bit better in low light, but not that 99% of the people will notice. You can use Nikon lenses that go back to the 1950s. I actually have a 45 year old lens for my setup. It's amazing.
One caveat is that I haven't bought a new camera in 7 years, or a new lens in 5.
But I hear those Sony A7's are the bomb too.
Good luck.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:41 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
"Nikon has a ton of built in features" - I mean FFS
I shoot in manual. I don't need features.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:44 pm to GetCocky11
quote:Which is why I like Canon.
I shoot in manual. I don't need features.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:47 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
I shoot in manual. I don't need features.
Fuji XT-X line I'd great for manual. Old school dials, and you rarely have to get into the menu. It's one big advantage over comparable Sony models.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:53 pm to Vincent van Goat
I’m actually getting into nature photography and thinking of buying a used D7500 (I already have nikonnlenses and a d3300). Somebody tell me why that’s a good or bad idea 
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:54 pm to JudgeRoyBean
quote:
I have a Nikon D500. And when/should I wear it out, I'll look at MILC at that time and see what is good then. Of course I'm assuming I'll have the needed cash.
One of my problems is, I’m only a serious amateur photographer, and I already have about $5,000 invested in Nikon lenses. I know I could use an adapter, but I’d probably want Sony lenses and I just can’t justify the expense.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:56 pm to LSUgusto
quote:
Which is why I like Canon.
Which has all of Nikon's "built in features"
This post was edited on 4/8/20 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 4/8/20 at 5:03 pm to Pettifogger
I have a Nikon D-90 that I’ve used for well over 10 years , I can’t imagine needing anything more advanced. Solid camera.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 5:03 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
shoot in manual. I don't need features.
I shoot almost exclusively in manual too, but that doesn’t mean I don’t want a camera that delivers great low light capabilities, handles digital noise well or has great dynamic range.
One of the main reasons I want to switch to mirrorless is because of the smaller size and weight and it’s easier portability when hiking.
This post was edited on 4/8/20 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 4/8/20 at 5:07 pm to Revelator
Exactly
Plenty of pro and advanced amateur shooters use the hell out of subject tracking and bracketing and IBIS and whatever else we're categorizing as "features"
Plenty of pro and advanced amateur shooters use the hell out of subject tracking and bracketing and IBIS and whatever else we're categorizing as "features"
Posted on 4/8/20 at 5:09 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Plenty of pro and advanced amateur shooters use the hell out of subject tracking and bracketing and IBIS and whatever else we're categorizing as "features
And I hear the subject tracking is superb on some of the newer Sony mirrorless cameras. But I shoot mostly landscapes and wouldn’t really need this feature, but in camera focus stacking and focus peaking would be awesome
This post was edited on 4/8/20 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 4/8/20 at 5:14 pm to Vincent van Goat
Pentax if your going DSLR.
Great optics and shake reduction built into the body.
Great optics and shake reduction built into the body.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 5:17 pm to jlovel7
quote:
I’m actually getting into nature photography and thinking of buying a used D7500 (I already have nikonnlenses and a d3300). Somebody tell me why that’s a good or bad idea
Good idea much better in low light for better image quality when cropped. APS-C format also has more "reach" than FF for long distance shots like birds due to the crop factor.That is unless you're an OT baller and can afford $5k and up FF zoom lenses and cameras.
I buy used gear from Adorama some from B&H both are good have never had an issue, both always low shutter counts <200 on the E rated stuff. Coming from a D3300 you may be happy with a less expensive D5500, unless D7500 weather sealing is important to you. The D5500 is surprisingly good in low light have bought several for my kids.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News