- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/10/21 at 9:38 pm to T
Does the metro council hold this much power? Can they vote for a monorail and just have it green lighted? An interstate loop with a new Mississippi River bridge?
Posted on 2/10/21 at 9:40 pm to NBD
And also Morvant for not ruling on the cap issue. He should have ruled and let the appellate courts take it up if need be.
Posted on 2/10/21 at 9:52 pm to LordSnow
The Chester?
Only way he lasts longer than that is the money going to lawyers to keep pushing the case back.
Only way he lasts longer than that is the money going to lawyers to keep pushing the case back.
Posted on 2/10/21 at 9:55 pm to T
How much is the metro council’s kickback? You know somebody got paid.
Posted on 2/10/21 at 9:58 pm to lsumailman61
It’s crazy how a POS turned into a martyr and his family are millionaires now
I’m sure it’ll go back into the community at a rapid rate
I’m sure it’ll go back into the community at a rapid rate
Posted on 2/10/21 at 9:59 pm to lsumailman61
Is this just fantasy?
Caught in a landslide
No escape from reality
Caught in a landslide
No escape from reality
Posted on 2/10/21 at 9:59 pm to geauxfortwo
I’m sure that a couple luxury cars will get completely tricked out and a lot of rocks will get smoked.
Posted on 2/10/21 at 10:00 pm to terd ferguson
I am glad my arse is moving to LP. frick this bullshite.
Posted on 2/10/21 at 10:06 pm to Modern
quote:
Um, it wasn’t just the black councilman/women that voted in favor....
Vote no and get labeled a raaaaaacist!!!
Posted on 2/10/21 at 10:12 pm to michael corleone
quote:
so max is 2.5 mil...
This is not correct. The law provides for one, single $500,000 limit or “cap” for all wrongful death claims associated with the wrongful death of any one individual in suits against the state or political subdivision no matter the number of claimants or suits filed. If a jury awarded $10,000,000 dollars to the family for Sterling’s wrongful death, the family would only get $500,000 total to be divided up. Furthermore, the maximum amount a person can recover for personal injury in suits against the state or a political subdivision is $500,000. This is a separate limitation or “cap”. Ostensibly, Sterling himself had a pre death cause of action for pain and suffering which action is inherited by his heirs and they asserted it on his behalf. If a jury awarded Sterling $10,000,000 for his conscious pain and suffering, mental anguish, and pre death fear, the city parish would only have to pay the “cap” of $500k. So, $1,000,000 total is the most the city would have to pay in general damages for all suits and claimants. The problem arises with calculating special economic damages, loss of support for which there is no limitation of liability. However, with Sterling what is a reasonable number that the children could be awarded for loss of support? Given Sterling’s history, small income, the family relationship and the ages of the children relative to the time they will become adults no longer entitled to be awarded loss of support, I don’t see how you get to millions of dollars in economic loss/loss of support. This settlement is beyond bogus.
Posted on 2/10/21 at 10:16 pm to beachdude
quote:
This is not correct. The law provides for one, single $500,000 limit or “cap” for all wrongful death claims associated with the wrongful death of any one individual in suits against the state or political subdivision no matter the number of claimants or suits filed. If a jury awarded $10,000,000 dollars to the family for Sterling’s wrongful death, the family would only get $500,000 total to be divided up. Furthermore, the maximum amount a person can recover for personal injury in suits against the state or a political subdivision is $500,000. This is a separate limitation or “cap”. Ostensibly, Sterling himself had a pre death cause of action for pain and suffering which action is inherited by his heirs and they asserted it on his behalf. If a jury awarded Sterling $10,000,000 for his conscious pain and suffering, mental anguish, and pre death fear, the city parish would only have to pay the “cap” of $500k. So, $1,000,000 total is the most the city would have to pay in general damages for all suits and claimants. The problem arises with calculating special economic damages, loss of support for which there is no limitation of liability. However, with Sterling what is a reasonable number that the children could be awarded for loss of support? Given Sterling’s history, small income, the family relationship and the ages of the children relative to the time they will become adults no longer entitled to be awarded loss of support, I don’t see how you get to millions of dollars in economic loss/loss of support. This settlement is beyond bogus.
Not that a single dollar is deserved in this case, but the fact there is a cap on how much a family can sue the government if they WRONGFULLY KILL YOU is fricking criminal.
Posted on 2/10/21 at 10:41 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
Rowdy Gaudet
What is this guy's deal?
Posted on 2/10/21 at 10:50 pm to armsdealer
quote:
Not that a single dollar is deserved in this case, but the fact there is a cap on how much a family can sue the government if they WRONGFULLY KILL YOU is fricking criminal
We also have a cap on medical malpractice in Louisiana. It’s $500,000 in pain and suffering.
So that spine surgeon can have that third martini the night before, scrub into your surgery pretty buzzzed at 5 am, frick you up royally, and hey, you’re now a paraplegic. Good luck with the $500k for your loss of quality of life.
This post was edited on 2/10/21 at 10:51 pm
Posted on 2/10/21 at 11:42 pm to LSUDAN1
quote:
Denise Amarosa is a sell out.
yes. absolutely worthless. absolutely phoning it in. only there because her husband was on the council. too bad no one worth a shite would run against her.
Posted on 2/11/21 at 7:31 am to T
Live look at St. George


This post was edited on 2/11/21 at 7:38 am
Posted on 2/11/21 at 7:53 am to Big_Slim
Yea, grew up in this city, but i'm never giving these assclowns another cent of my taxes except when i pay sales tax at Costco. BR is done.
Popular
Back to top


1








