Started By
Message

On this day 158 years ago, Vicksburg surrendered to Union forces (July 4, 1863)

Posted on 7/4/21 at 7:13 am
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65113 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 7:13 am
It was most certainly a Fourth of July to remember if you were a lover of the Union. Robert E. Lee had suffered his first major defeat up in Gettysburg the day before. And on July 4, 1863, Ulysses S. Grant won what is arguably one of the greatest strategic victories in American military history with his capture of Vicksburg. This victory gave Union forces unfettered access to the whole of the Mississippi River, effectively cutting the Confederacy in two. No longer could Texas, Arkansas, and Confederate-controlled Louisiana and Missouri send supplies and men to other parts of the Confederacy.

Grant would ride the wave of his victory to become the commanding officer of all Union forces in the Western Theater - an act which culminated in his most brilliant tactical victory, the Battle of Chattanooga. The latter battle would convince Lincoln that he had found his general and would in good time promote Grant to General-in-Chief of all Union Armies.
This post was edited on 7/4/21 at 7:14 am
Posted by whiskey over ice
Member since Sep 2020
3263 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 7:21 am to
Mississippi in last place for 158 years and counting
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 7:35 am to
Posted by RGJ18
Collierville, TN
Member since Feb 2010
8682 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 7:55 am to
Who knew that 158 years later, idiots would still be flying the loser Confederate flag.
Posted by MikeAV8s
Member since Oct 2016
1741 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:04 am to
Who knew 158 years later people wouldn’t be able to understand history in context.
Posted by McVick
Member since Jan 2011
4467 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:08 am to
And how long did Vicksburg refuse to celebrate Independence Day?
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
15005 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Who knew 158 years later people wouldn’t be able to understand history in context.



That person you're responding to is just triggered because he knows he can't do shite about what a person does other than flap his gums. It's the outcry of a wuss


Posted by Gr8t8s
Member since Oct 2009
2579 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:14 am to
Wasn’t it like 80-something years they refused to celebrate?
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
21426 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:17 am to
Odd to me that Gettysburg is during that time period of the war. I always put it during the last days of the war.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65113 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:18 am to
quote:

Odd to me that Gettysburg is during that time period of the war. I always put it during the last days of the war.



Gettysburg is often built up as the turning point of the war and the beginning of the end of the Confederacy. People forget that it took two more years and hundreds of thousands of lives for the armies to arrive at Appomattox. I'm of the school of thought that there was no true turning point of the war. The Confederacy just ran out of manpower and supplies.
This post was edited on 7/4/21 at 8:19 am
Posted by SavageOrangeJug
Member since Oct 2005
19758 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Who knew that 158 years later, idiots would still be flying the loser Confederate flag.


Meanwhile, 158 years later. We have idiots that support BLM.


Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29685 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:25 am to
Been thinking about this actually

THIS year feels like Vicksburg in 1864...
Posted by usmcnav
Member since Nov 2009
70 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:27 am to
I had 3 gggrandfathers who fought at Vicksburg. All with Mississippi units
Posted by bcflash
bossier city
Member since Oct 2016
447 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:33 am to
Well they flying a blm flag and building statues of drug dealers so...............
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27544 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:34 am to
Actually you could argue that both Gettysburg ind Vicksburg are indicative of your supply and manpower assertion. Grant choked off the supply lines with an assist from Farragut taking NO and some argue that Gettysburg was a foraging on a large scale mission. But if you are going to invade your enemy's territory you better not have his army of the same or greater size follow you. Ideally on an invasion you want a 2 to 1 advantage.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98855 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:35 am to
And Vicksburg didn't celebrate the 4th for almost 100 years after
Posted by OleWar
Troy H. Middleton Library
Member since Mar 2008
5828 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:39 am to
In what American city is that? Baltimore?
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
25207 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:39 am to
Gettysburg and Vicksburg also ended any hope of foreign recognition of the confederacy.

Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98855 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Gettysburg and Vicksburg also ended any hope of foreign recognition of the confederacy


If Davis had promised to abolish slavery after the war, Britain would have come in on their side.
Posted by Dirk Dawgler
Where I Am
Member since Nov 2011
2484 posts
Posted on 7/4/21 at 8:42 am to
My great, great, great grandfather was a sergeant in the 39th GA., Company H (Gilmer Tigers) and was taken prisoner that day after Pemberton surrendered. He was part of the prisoner exchange that took place soon thereafter.

The siege of Vicksburg that took place prior to the surrender is a good study of one of the most miserable experiences for a local population in the civil war.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram