- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official Thread: Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:21 am to TheDoc
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:21 am to TheDoc
they had enough fuel to fly to a remote location, then take off at a later date to be used in an attack?
Id imagine buying enough jet fuel for a 777 would raise some flags
Id imagine buying enough jet fuel for a 777 would raise some flags
2
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:21 am to WDE24
My observation of it being blown up is just as credible of it being in the ocean or in a hanger.
Hell nobody knows and until proven and found no scenario should be closed. (Besides aliens of course)
Hell nobody knows and until proven and found no scenario should be closed. (Besides aliens of course)
This post was edited on 3/11/14 at 10:23 am
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:22 am to TheDoc
quote:It is such a remote and unlikely possibility at this point as to not be realistic. Yes.
so killing all the passengers and flying the plane to an undisclosed location isn't a possibility?
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:23 am to WDE24
where's the evidence of a crash?
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:23 am to MrPappagiorgio
the can build nukes, but can't get fuel to refill the plane?
This post was edited on 3/11/14 at 10:23 am
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:23 am to Sus-Scrofa
quote:
I still vote for the mid air explosion.
Me too. If the plane completely dissolved mid-air, the only thing left will be small items from the plane, that will wash up on shore lines over the next few months.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:23 am to Cooter Davenport
quote:
So if it lands on an island airstrip in SE Asia or a desert airstrip in some Middle East Islamic fundie shithole
exactly
and they had tons of fuel
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:24 am to WDE24
After that Malaysian military report about the plane veering off course and their tracking of the damn thing for another 200 miles or so...I am starting to wonder if there is some government cover up going on here as well....
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:24 am to TheDoc
could have been hijacked and purposely kept in tact to use for a future terrorist attack or converted to a bomber.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:25 am to WDE24
This is also a 777 which requires a long runway (and even longer with more fuel) to land. Are there remote runways that are long enough and can withstand the landing of a 777 that we don't know about?
I'd imagine the US knows where every one of these runways are in the world.
I'd imagine the US knows where every one of these runways are in the world.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:25 am to Shankopotomus
Did they track any of the passenger's cell phones or is that not possible in that area?
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:25 am to Shankopotomus
quote:
The relatives of the passengers saying the phones were ringing when called. Although I know these poor folks are just grasping at straws, as we all know when your phone is dead it typically goes straight to voicemail so it is possible I suppose...
If that were the case, the recieving phone would have to ping off of a tower wherever they were and would be EASILY traceable. I would think tracing the cell phones of the passengers wa/is one of the first steps taken in a situation like this.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:26 am to J Murdah
quote:
could have been hijacked and purposely kept in tact to use for a future terrorist attack or converted to a bomber.
could have
we have no idea what happened to this plane
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:26 am to lsustax
Has the pictures of the two guys been discussed?
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:26 am to TheDoc
quote:
evidence is tangible.
Nope.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:26 am to TheDoc
Y'all are arguing over semantics here....
I think the most plausible scenario is they lost all ability to communicate their emergency, glided down into the ocean, and sank. Emergency beacons/transponders didn't activate. Or they made their way to the Indonesian jungle.
I think the most plausible scenario is they lost all ability to communicate their emergency, glided down into the ocean, and sank. Emergency beacons/transponders didn't activate. Or they made their way to the Indonesian jungle.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:26 am to MrPappagiorgio
quote:
Id imagine buying enough jet fuel for a 777 would raise some flags
Nah, you can pick that up at Costco
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:27 am to tLSU
quote:
Nope
what do you mean nope?
there is no evidence of the plane yet
no one knows what happened
we can guess all day long... still no evidence
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:27 am to TOKEN
quote:
Odds of a Hijack or attempted Hijack?
I have no clue. Why is that relevant to anything?
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:27 am to GeeOH
Come to think of it, this plane did NOT glide over land without all of the passengers cell phones "pinging" of of any available cell towers below.
eta: not if they were as low as reported (under 3000 ft) Pings would happen.
eta: not if they were as low as reported (under 3000 ft) Pings would happen.
Page 50 of 375
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News