- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/31/19 at 11:39 pm to boosiebadazz
Woman tries to use People v Battle explanation during traffic stop
It didn’t work. Keeps citing People v Battle and Black’s Law Dictionary.
It didn’t work. Keeps citing People v Battle and Black’s Law Dictionary.
This post was edited on 1/31/19 at 11:40 pm
Posted on 2/1/19 at 9:13 am to Parmen
quote:
According to People v. Battle, 50 Cal. App. 3d Supp. 1, 6-7; traffic infractions are not crimes. Why isn’t this the law of the land yet? Other courts should adopt this interpretation
According to an opinion issued from the appellate department of the Los Angeles Superior Court, traffic infractions in the state of California are not crimes. This interpretation relies on a web of statutory cross referencing pertaining to mode of trial, right to counsel, etc, specific to the state of California.
It would be inappropriate for other states to “adopt” anything from this case; they would need to do their own individual analysis of their applicable state law.
Posted on 2/1/19 at 9:47 am to Joshjrn
International Shoe
Posted on 2/1/19 at 9:53 am to Joshjrn
I was hoping to hear your take for clarification.
Posted on 2/1/19 at 9:57 am to zeebo
quote:
International Shoe
Jurisdiction issues?
Posted on 2/1/19 at 9:59 am to zeebo
quote:
International Shoe
*eye twitches*
Posted on 2/1/19 at 10:00 am to Parmen
quote:Please leave the lawyering to the lawyers.
No jury in a traffic case sometimes, 6th amendment problem
Posted on 2/1/19 at 10:16 am to Parmen
In Texas, traffic tickets can go to a jury.
Posted on 2/1/19 at 10:17 am to Joshjrn
Do you have a copy of Black’s Law Dictionary?
Posted on 2/1/19 at 10:52 am to Parmen
quote:
Do you have a copy of Black’s Law Dictionary?
I do, but I’m currently traveling out of state, so I don’t have easy access to it. With that said, I assume Lexis or Westlaw has it. And with that said, my copy is basically a hundred dollar doorstop, as I’ve never actually used it for anything.
So with all of that now said, why do you ask?
Posted on 2/1/19 at 3:35 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
I do, but I’m currently traveling out of state, so I don’t have easy access to it. With that said, I assume Lexis or Westlaw has it. And with that said, my copy is basically a hundred dollar doorstop, as I’ve never actually used it for anything.
So with all of that now said, why do you ask?
Well sovereign citizens cite to it when interacting with police all the time like it's a divine document. Quite a contrast when you use it as a doorstop
Keep wanting to know who is injured, because a crime requires an injured party and wanting to see corpus delecti
Posted on 2/1/19 at 5:32 pm to Parmen
quote:
Well sovereign citizens cite to it when interacting with police all the time like it's a divine document. Quite a contrast when you use it as a doorstop
Keep wanting to know who is injured, because a crime requires an injured party and wanting to see corpus delecti
Yeah, reminds me of when my clients argue with me citing the Model Penal Code. Merely secondary sources, dears, not binding documents
Posted on 2/1/19 at 8:02 pm to zeebo
quote:
International Shoe
Lol
Posted on 2/1/19 at 8:13 pm to zeebo
quote:
International Shoe
Pennoyer v.Neff
Posted on 2/1/19 at 8:41 pm to Parmen
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/8/25 at 1:33 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News