Started By
Message

re: NYC Health Code Declares Pet Sitting Illegal

Posted on 7/23/17 at 5:48 pm to
Posted by ptra
Member since Nov 2006
1464 posts
Posted on 7/23/17 at 5:48 pm to
So pet sitting without the exchange of money is not a health hazard to the pets or the public. That damn money is always the problem.
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
30764 posts
Posted on 7/23/17 at 5:58 pm to
NY takes care of their Union Members and Businesses.

Kennels and boarding places greased politicians. Liberal Cities and their politicians are like whores, always offering up their services for a fee.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80761 posts
Posted on 7/23/17 at 6:49 pm to
This reminds me of when cities tried to ban Uber
This post was edited on 7/23/17 at 7:28 pm
Posted by Capo Losi
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2016
2193 posts
Posted on 7/23/17 at 7:22 pm to
More regulation.

What it should say is the government of New York has decided it is not compensated enough, so permit up bitch.

This is not the same as Uber or Lyft btw.
This post was edited on 7/23/17 at 7:23 pm
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
103878 posts
Posted on 7/23/17 at 7:29 pm to
I wish they'd be honest about why they do it. It's not due to health concerns. It's because the Govt can't tax a person who accepts cash to take care of a pet unless the person just reports it on income (they won't)

fricking liberals
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
67249 posts
Posted on 7/23/17 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

wish they'd be honest about why they do it. It's not due to health concerns. It's because the Govt can't tax a person who accepts cash to take care of a pet unless the person just reports it on income (they won't)


Exactly.

This isn't about protecting some pet sitting corporations it's about preventing cash payments
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:18 pm to
NY proving once again that no man's life, liberty or property are safe, as long as the legislature is in session.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
16221 posts
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:57 pm to
Why do I have a feeling there were people running kennels out of their apartment. Most people would be pissed if their apartment neighbor was kenneling a bunch of animals.
Posted by pjab
Member since Mar 2016
5775 posts
Posted on 7/23/17 at 10:48 pm to
No bullshite, it's $90 a day for me to board my dog at the vet in NYC. The last time I picked her up she went outside and pissed like never before so it's not like they are providing an exception service.
Posted by someLSUdoosh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2016
893 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Why do I have a feeling there were people running kennels out of their apartment. Most people would be pissed if their apartment neighbor was kenneling a bunch of animals.


This honestly is plausible.....but....given its New York this is all about the money grab.

Im sure there are a one or two of these that a "crazy cat lady" or some shite decided to house sit 50 pets at a time, but its gotta be about the money.
Posted by pjab
Member since Mar 2016
5775 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:50 am to
It's about the money. Buildings have general rules and pet policies that would regulate this issue.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
16221 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 2:30 pm to
I know it probably is a money grab. I just wonder if you have some people who are trying to make serious money off it. Similar to how air bnb has turned into a ton of properties strictly used as part time rentals.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram