- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: (nsfw)Ma'am Yes Ma'am: Army approves first 22 female officers for Ground Combat
Posted on 4/15/16 at 7:28 pm to northshorebamaman
Posted on 4/15/16 at 7:28 pm to northshorebamaman
It's been a long time since I knighted for NoHo:
:knight3:
:knight3:
Posted on 4/15/16 at 7:29 pm to Kujo
Meanwhile Russia is flying 30 ft above our destroyer deck, China is building bases by the day, and Iran is shipping weapons all over the East. Obama has single handedly gutted our military the last 7 years and has made us into a laughing stock with his SJW/liberal policies.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 7:30 pm to Ace Midnight
Damn, my bad. can't believe I missed that one.

Posted on 4/15/16 at 8:07 pm to CadesCove
quote:
rather get Animal Mother's take on it.
It would not be favorable. Nor would Hartmans. (Believe that was drill Sgt. Name)
Posted on 4/16/16 at 6:27 pm to Ace Midnight
So the chick in my course failed land nav(shocker). Then she got a retest and the instructor went along with her to make sure she passed. 
Posted on 4/16/16 at 6:38 pm to Kujo
FWIW I personally know a woman who can carry an 80 pound pack up Mount Rainier (hint - not flat terrain), I was there when she did it. She's all of 5'2" and probably doesn't outweigh her pack by much.
They're pretty rare but I wouldn't doubt that a woman bigger than her could do much better.
If they can truly do the work then let 'em in. Why anyone, male or female, would volunteer for infantry is another question, it should be grounds for a psych eval at least.
They're pretty rare but I wouldn't doubt that a woman bigger than her could do much better.
If they can truly do the work then let 'em in. Why anyone, male or female, would volunteer for infantry is another question, it should be grounds for a psych eval at least.
Posted on 4/16/16 at 7:03 pm to foshizzle
quote:
FWIW I personally know a woman who can carry an 80 pound pack up Mount Rainier (hint - not flat terrain), I was there when she did it. She's all of 5'2" and probably doesn't outweigh her pack by much.
They're pretty rare but I wouldn't doubt that a woman bigger than her could do much better.
If they can truly do the work then let 'em in. Why anyone, male or female, would volunteer for infantry is another question, it should be grounds for a psych eval at least.
Could she pull an unconscious 200+ pound man out of the hatch of a burning tank?
This post was edited on 4/16/16 at 7:04 pm
Posted on 4/16/16 at 7:08 pm to Kujo
"That's a Hell of a price to pay to be stylish."
Posted on 4/16/16 at 7:10 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
So the chick in my course failed land nav(shocker). Then she got a retest and the instructor went along with her to make sure she passed.
Color me shocked...
I'm honestly glad to have grown up in the Cold War army and this current shite show. I can honestly say, "we told you so..."
This post was edited on 4/16/16 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 4/16/16 at 8:53 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Could she pull an unconscious 200+ pound man out of the hatch of a burning tank?
In a situation like that you have to gamble. I'd rather gamble with her than a random male boot graduate. Maybe it works out, maybe it doesn't.
Elite female athletes will be crushed by elite male athletes, but will dominate male amateurs.
How many guys can you really truly trust to pull you out of a the hatch of a burning tank?
Posted on 4/16/16 at 9:06 pm to foshizzle
Every single one I served with.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 8:31 am to foshizzle
quote:
If they can truly do the work then let 'em in.
Or just lower the standards...
Pressure grows on Marines to consider lowering combat standards for women
quote:
Two years ago, Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the nation’s top military officer, laid down an edict on the Obama administration’s plan to open direct land combat jobs to women: If women cannot meet a standard, senior commanders better have a good reason why it should not be lowered.
Today, the “Dempsey rule” appears to have its first test case.
The Marine Corps just finished research to see if female officers could successfully complete its rigorous Infantry Officer Course.
A IOC diploma is a must to earn the designation of infantry officer. Of 29 women who tried, none graduated; only four made it through the first day’s combat endurance test.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 8:33 am to terd ferguson
quote:
Or just lower the standards...
This is what pisses me off, if you do the same job then you should be held to the same standard. I hated it in the Nave when women got more time to make their run, had to do fewer push ups and sit up yet did the same job I did.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 8:36 am to foshizzle
quote:
How many guys can you really truly trust to pull you out of a the hatch of a burning tank?
Every MFer on my tank would be able to do it, or we would have a problem. Mary Jane Rottencrotch is generally incapable of developing the strength required to be able to do that. Most males could (and would) get strong enough if given the "proper motivation."
Posted on 4/19/16 at 8:38 am to baldona
quote:
I've read some interesting articles that women in Afghanistan have a much easier time getting intel from kids and local women because they are more comfortable talking to a woman
Posted on 4/19/16 at 8:41 am to terd ferguson
Year old article bro. Women are allowed in combat arms in the infantry
Popular
Back to top


2









