re: NSFW: You Millennials and Gen Xers will never be as cool as your mothers and grandmothers

quote:

---

This all started due to a challenge of a 911 vs. muscle car in 1/4.

---

It was actually a challenge by OP to bring "my honda" to TN to race him. When I said I didn't have a honda, OP finally admitted to driving a SUV.

The only person arguing whether or not a 911 is the optimal drag car is you. No one has claimed otherwise.

quote:

---

The only person arguing whether or not a 911 is the optimal drag car is you. No one has claimed otherwise.

---

Weeellll, maybe you should go back to the page where you provided a link to a $190,700 car when 1/4 mile times were pointed out.

NOPE, nope, I didn't start that discussion.

We've veered so off topic itt, which is fine by me.


The whole thing started with OP saying they had better cars. He posted a couple of 60s muscle cars and I replied that they were slow and fat. Which they are, by today's standards. The whole argument was a comparison between the muscle of 60s/70s and cars of today.

Many many cars of today would smoke most of the popular muscle cars from back then. Obviously, this comparison is stock vs stock. I can't imagine why anyone would get into an argument about stock vs modified.

It's a plain fact that in stock trim, those old muscle cars (while fast for their time) would not keep up with even low level performance cars of today. That goes for quarter mile, road racing, auto x etc.

Dumbass OP seems to ignore the fact that we've been in a decade long HP war and the performance you can get today for relatively cheap is insane. A base mustang 4 cylinder can put down times that aren't far off from the top trims of those massive v8 muscle cars from that era. The 68 GTX he was pimping as some bastion of muscle car performance get's to 60 mph slower than a 2016 honda accord.

Car and Driver did a test in 2006 of a 68 GT500KR and a 68 427 Vette. The GT500 did a 13.9 Quarter/5.4 0-60 and the vette did a 13.8 Quarter/5.3 0-60. Fast for the time, definitely. Fast for today? Lol no. shite, Ford makes F150s that hit those numbers.



I mean shite, in today's world we have automakers pumping out 800+ HP, sub 10 second cars with a full warranty. It's crazy.

quote:

---

Sun God

---

I think we have found the fat kid with the 4-door Civic...buts it's really fast. Even has clears on the tail lights.

quote:

---

Here’s the 1/4 miles fastest cars. I’m pretty sure no one in this thread has owned any of these until you get to a corvette about 1/2 way down the list of course this is straight off the production floor. Of course there are faster 1/4 mile cars but they have been modified to run faster than factory.

---

Sorry, list is bullshite. Have you not read the thread?

No Honda Accords, 4 cylinder Mustangs, or super fast Volkswagen 996 on the list.

Here is a thread more suited to Sun God the fat kid, Mouth Breather, scary Tactical Man, and the 50 year old who was left out of every generation's fun.

Since this thread hurt your vaginas. You can post how you femscape yours..

Femscape thread

quote:

---

Your obsession with me is creepy.

---

That's laughable. You chased Redbone and I all through this thread trying to get noticed.

Who made the thread? Who came in running their punk bitch mouth as usual?

Meh, just pointing out that had a bad week on the OT.

You got catty about it as usual.

quote:

---

I replied that they were slow and fat. Which they are, by today's standards

---

And that is the right answer. I have had a lot of people ask me at car shows if my 50 year old Chevy is 'fast'. I just look to either side of me at newer cars and say, "It's quick, but by today's performance standards, it's not fast at all". It most always gets a confused look by some that don't understand the engineering technology and advances of the new engines and transmissions.

eta: Good thread Savage