Started By
Message

re: Now we got principals banging students

Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:25 pm to
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

If the guy weren't a student, this wouldn't be an issue.


She is still a piece of trash who completely betrayed her own family.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
45425 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:28 pm to
That's my fetish
Posted by PUB
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
21235 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:35 pm to
19 years old too ...........
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122534 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

How is this bad if the student was 19?


I think it is usually against school policy for employees to engage in relationships with students. It isn't illegal, it's just not allowed in schools..
Posted by mt1
LV
Member since Nov 2006
7738 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:38 pm to
Have to go with "lucky bastard" on this one.
Posted by Mr Personality
Bangkok
Member since Mar 2014
27364 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:39 pm to
She was also fricking him on school property
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
19917 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

It isn't illegal, it's just not allowed in schools..


The article clearly states she turned herself in to police and will face charges
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31597 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

She is still a piece of trash who completely betrayed her own family.



I agree, people that cheat whether male or female are a POS.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
42686 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:45 pm to
Last week it was the teacher in Greer getting caught half naked with a student and now it's an assistant principal in West Columbia with a student. If you're 15-18 and in high school move to the Palmetto state.
Posted by momentoftruth87
Your mom
Member since Oct 2013
86110 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

A Cayce Department of Public Safety spokesperson said Diimmler faces charges of sexual battery from both them and the Columbia Police Department. If convicted, Diimmler could have to pay a maximum fine of $500, spend up to 30 days in jail, or both. Her bond in Richland County was set at $30,000 cash surety.


Why is it sexual battery?

Is it because she was an "authority figure"?

Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
42686 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Why is it sexual battery? 

South Carolina expanded its sexual misconduct statutes some time ago to include teacher-student relationships where the student was above the age of consent.
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
76781 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Why is it sexual battery?


guess she used toys during one of their sessions.
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43551 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

South Carolina expanded its sexual misconduct statutes some time ago to include teacher-student relationships where the student was above the age of consent.


But what if he was willing?

This makes no sense. How can you sexually batter someone who was willing?
Posted by momentoftruth87
Your mom
Member since Oct 2013
86110 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

But what if he was willing? This makes no sense. How can you sexually batter someone who was willing?


It comes down to her being charged with the well being of her students, I'm sure.

Especially an assistant principal.


Posted by Nachos Man
Member since Feb 2018
147 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:53 pm to
eeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggggggfffffffffff
This post was edited on 6/26/18 at 7:16 pm
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
16272 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

If yes to all these, he's alpha.


I get your point, but being a 19 year old high school student still qualifies one as dumber than shite.
Posted by Saltwatersoul04
The Island
Member since Apr 2013
1401 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:54 pm to
She was able to take "advantage" of him due to her position in the school. bullshite but that's the law.
This post was edited on 2/26/18 at 2:55 pm
Posted by momentoftruth87
Your mom
Member since Oct 2013
86110 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

I'd share my nachos with her.


quote:

Nachos Man


Checks out
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
42686 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

But what if he was willing? 

This makes no sense. How can you sexually batter someone who was willing?

Unfortunately it is a strict liability offense, which makes consent irrelevant. I agree wholeheartedly that the law is both ridiculous and overbroad. This woman should be fired and her husband should hit the hills running with those three kids, but this shouldn't be a crime.
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43551 posts
Posted on 2/26/18 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

It comes down to her being charged with the well being of her students, I'm sure.

Especially an assistant principal.


Well she was taking care of his sexual health!

The dude is 19! Gotta keep that prostate in pristine shape!














first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram