Started By
Message

re: Not sure if this has been covered- EBR drops GPA for student athletes to 1.5

Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:39 pm to
Posted by Bags of Milk
The Sunny Beaches of Canada
Member since Feb 2013
3402 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:39 pm to
If they are going to continue to pretend they are students first and athletes second then it should be 2.0. You pass you play.

If not, then just drop it all together and not have a minimum GPA.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:40 pm to
I think Forrest Gump could get near a 2.0 in a 2015 American high school.
Posted by Meatball
Member since Sep 2009
5148 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

NIH


Posted by tigerbutt
Deep South
Member since Jun 2006
26452 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:46 pm to
Delete this thread already
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Delete this thread already
why? People are discussing the topic. I know it's old news but why do you care if people are discussing the topic in this thread?
Posted by tigerbutt
Deep South
Member since Jun 2006
26452 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

I know it's old news but


You answered your own question.
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
12806 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:52 pm to
a 1.5 is pretty miserable. what is the point of having a minimum at that point?
Posted by Wasp
Off Highland rd.
Member since Sep 2012
1540 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:53 pm to
I believe it is a good thing.

There are two types of kids in the system. Those that is effects and those that it doesn't.

Almost anyone would admit that the ones this effects are failing anyway and have destroyed the school system. Not sure why people are worried anyway. Does it somehow change your perception of the system or change whether you would send your kid there?

What it might possibly do is: keep the kids that this effects (the ones already failing) off the streets, might bring them back to school, might put them in a classroom, might put them with a mentor who is looking out for their best interest, might give them a new set of friends that aren't from their streets and might give them a chance to finish high school.

This literally has no effect on anyone that cares about their child's education. It will be reviewed multiple times this year to determine its efficacy and decide whether to continue it or not.

In short, yes it is a good idea.
Posted by Wasp
Off Highland rd.
Member since Sep 2012
1540 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:54 pm to
Lhsaa requires a gpa. Do people ever research stuff or just blab stupidity on here?
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
104486 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

on't you need at least a 2.0 to play college sports?


This is more about keeping borderline kids in school and graduating than it is preparing them for college sports.
Posted by roguetiger15
Member since Jan 2013
17685 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:59 pm to
Same amount of kids will still be disqualified for not making the grades. you would think it was common sense to know almost all of the students barely making the grade do just enough to skirt by.
Posted by Wasp
Off Highland rd.
Member since Sep 2012
1540 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 3:02 pm to
Then your common sense will prevail and be evident in the results later this year.
Posted by tigerbutt
Deep South
Member since Jun 2006
26452 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Lhsaa requires a gpa. Do people ever research stuff or just blab stupidity on here?


Yeah it's all been posted on here, nearly 3 weeks ago.
Posted by Wasp
Off Highland rd.
Member since Sep 2012
1540 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 3:11 pm to
quote:


My son wrote a paper on this. He is in the 10th grade, has a 3.85 GPA, and plays baseball for the high school. He thinks it's ridiculous that EBR schools are lowering the standards for student athletes.


Any particular points he made or are we supposed to be astonished that your 10th grade kid wrote a "paper" on this and thinks it is "ridiculous"?

And congrats on valuing your 16 year old kids opinion on education policy greater than your own!
Posted by RedPop4
Santiago de Compostela
Member since Jan 2005
15342 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 4:34 pm to
Some good points Wasp.
I'm as conservative as they come, for the most part. I've also been in education for 22 years. For a couple years I was forced into the classroom as a 6th grade Spanish teacher (undergrad. degree) or "see the Headmaster." So, I went into the classroom. I'm actually a librarian, and worked the middle school/high school library at a local private, independent school.

There was a kid in my class, did homework, for the most part, but was a great football player. He was truly talented, not a bad kid. But, bless his heart, he simply did not succeed in the classroom. We had a meeting with all his teachers, him, his parents (divorced), admin. and all the same old stuff was said..."if he concentrated on his studies like he does on football..."

You know the drill. Well, the kid tried, his parents tried, he simply, could not do it. God gives us all talents and in amounts only He knows. This kid was unable to do the work, even with help, on the academic side of things. Do we take away these kids only talents? Obviously we can't all be 4.0 students, no matter how much we talk about lowering the bar, etc.

On the whole I agree that the more you lower expectations, the more kids will slide to achieve them or not achieve them.

However, there are always those kids who just don't have it, and even conscientiousness and effort won't help.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram