- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not sure if this has been covered- EBR drops GPA for student athletes to 1.5
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:39 pm to meauxjeaux2
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:39 pm to meauxjeaux2
If they are going to continue to pretend they are students first and athletes second then it should be 2.0. You pass you play.
If not, then just drop it all together and not have a minimum GPA.
If not, then just drop it all together and not have a minimum GPA.
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:40 pm to meauxjeaux2
I think Forrest Gump could get near a 2.0 in a 2015 American high school.
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:46 pm to meauxjeaux2
Delete this thread already
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:48 pm to tigerbutt
quote:why? People are discussing the topic. I know it's old news but why do you care if people are discussing the topic in this thread?
Delete this thread already
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:50 pm to meauxjeaux2
quote:
I know it's old news but
You answered your own question.
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:52 pm to tigerbutt
a 1.5 is pretty miserable. what is the point of having a minimum at that point?
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:53 pm to meauxjeaux2
I believe it is a good thing.
There are two types of kids in the system. Those that is effects and those that it doesn't.
Almost anyone would admit that the ones this effects are failing anyway and have destroyed the school system. Not sure why people are worried anyway. Does it somehow change your perception of the system or change whether you would send your kid there?
What it might possibly do is: keep the kids that this effects (the ones already failing) off the streets, might bring them back to school, might put them in a classroom, might put them with a mentor who is looking out for their best interest, might give them a new set of friends that aren't from their streets and might give them a chance to finish high school.
This literally has no effect on anyone that cares about their child's education. It will be reviewed multiple times this year to determine its efficacy and decide whether to continue it or not.
In short, yes it is a good idea.
There are two types of kids in the system. Those that is effects and those that it doesn't.
Almost anyone would admit that the ones this effects are failing anyway and have destroyed the school system. Not sure why people are worried anyway. Does it somehow change your perception of the system or change whether you would send your kid there?
What it might possibly do is: keep the kids that this effects (the ones already failing) off the streets, might bring them back to school, might put them in a classroom, might put them with a mentor who is looking out for their best interest, might give them a new set of friends that aren't from their streets and might give them a chance to finish high school.
This literally has no effect on anyone that cares about their child's education. It will be reviewed multiple times this year to determine its efficacy and decide whether to continue it or not.
In short, yes it is a good idea.
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:54 pm to NoSaint
Lhsaa requires a gpa. Do people ever research stuff or just blab stupidity on here?
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:58 pm to Sterling Archer
quote:
on't you need at least a 2.0 to play college sports?
This is more about keeping borderline kids in school and graduating than it is preparing them for college sports.
Posted on 8/25/15 at 2:59 pm to LSUBoo
Same amount of kids will still be disqualified for not making the grades. you would think it was common sense to know almost all of the students barely making the grade do just enough to skirt by.
Posted on 8/25/15 at 3:02 pm to roguetiger15
Then your common sense will prevail and be evident in the results later this year.
Posted on 8/25/15 at 3:07 pm to Wasp
quote:
Lhsaa requires a gpa. Do people ever research stuff or just blab stupidity on here?
Yeah it's all been posted on here, nearly 3 weeks ago.
Posted on 8/25/15 at 3:11 pm to Meatball
quote:
My son wrote a paper on this. He is in the 10th grade, has a 3.85 GPA, and plays baseball for the high school. He thinks it's ridiculous that EBR schools are lowering the standards for student athletes.
Any particular points he made or are we supposed to be astonished that your 10th grade kid wrote a "paper" on this and thinks it is "ridiculous"?
And congrats on valuing your 16 year old kids opinion on education policy greater than your own!
Posted on 8/25/15 at 4:34 pm to Wasp
Some good points Wasp.
I'm as conservative as they come, for the most part. I've also been in education for 22 years. For a couple years I was forced into the classroom as a 6th grade Spanish teacher (undergrad. degree) or "see the Headmaster." So, I went into the classroom. I'm actually a librarian, and worked the middle school/high school library at a local private, independent school.
There was a kid in my class, did homework, for the most part, but was a great football player. He was truly talented, not a bad kid. But, bless his heart, he simply did not succeed in the classroom. We had a meeting with all his teachers, him, his parents (divorced), admin. and all the same old stuff was said..."if he concentrated on his studies like he does on football..."
You know the drill. Well, the kid tried, his parents tried, he simply, could not do it. God gives us all talents and in amounts only He knows. This kid was unable to do the work, even with help, on the academic side of things. Do we take away these kids only talents? Obviously we can't all be 4.0 students, no matter how much we talk about lowering the bar, etc.
On the whole I agree that the more you lower expectations, the more kids will slide to achieve them or not achieve them.
However, there are always those kids who just don't have it, and even conscientiousness and effort won't help.
I'm as conservative as they come, for the most part. I've also been in education for 22 years. For a couple years I was forced into the classroom as a 6th grade Spanish teacher (undergrad. degree) or "see the Headmaster." So, I went into the classroom. I'm actually a librarian, and worked the middle school/high school library at a local private, independent school.
There was a kid in my class, did homework, for the most part, but was a great football player. He was truly talented, not a bad kid. But, bless his heart, he simply did not succeed in the classroom. We had a meeting with all his teachers, him, his parents (divorced), admin. and all the same old stuff was said..."if he concentrated on his studies like he does on football..."
You know the drill. Well, the kid tried, his parents tried, he simply, could not do it. God gives us all talents and in amounts only He knows. This kid was unable to do the work, even with help, on the academic side of things. Do we take away these kids only talents? Obviously we can't all be 4.0 students, no matter how much we talk about lowering the bar, etc.
On the whole I agree that the more you lower expectations, the more kids will slide to achieve them or not achieve them.
However, there are always those kids who just don't have it, and even conscientiousness and effort won't help.
Popular
Back to top

0







