Started By
Message

re: NO to BR train won't work so says expert

Posted on 2/1/16 at 9:45 am to
Posted by Boudreaux35
BR
Member since Sep 2007
21659 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Uh, Chicago's crime rate isn't great, and they seem to have good mass transit. I hope I just missed your point.


Huge difference in the size and population between BR and Chicago. I've been to plenty of northern cities. People live on top of each other. Everyone is crammed into the city. It makes sense that public transportation works when you have that density. Before public transportation works in BR, you'll have to have a system that services Ascension and Livingston also. That is going to be tough to make feasible.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36473 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 9:51 am to
It would be operated by local government, so no, it wouldn't work
Posted by ellishughtiger
70118
Member since Jul 2004
21135 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 9:52 am to
Yea. There should be a speed rail around the country not just limited to 2 metro areas. They have these all over Europe, Why not in the states?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84453 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Huge difference in the size and population between BR and Chicago. I've been to plenty of northern cities. People live on top of each other. Everyone is crammed into the city. It makes sense that public transportation works when you have that density. Before public transportation works in BR, you'll have to have a system that services Ascension and Livingston also. That is going to be tough to make feasible.



Ascension and Livingston are way too far away from downtown to be serviced by anything that would be feasible.

My point about you comment was that crime has nothing to do with why mass transit won't work here. Everything is too spread out for it to make sense.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84453 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 9:59 am to
quote:

They have these all over Europe, Why not in the states?



Because our country is a lot bigger than Europe, and the population is much more spread out.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39640 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:00 am to
Not to mention, IIRC, almost all the lines in Europe lose money as well.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101935 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:01 am to
quote:

quote:

They have these all over Europe, Why not in the states?
Because our country is a lot bigger than Europe, and the population is much more spread out.


And most of our cities did most of their developing after the invention of cars. Especially once you get away from the east coast.
Posted by torrey225
Member since Mar 2015
1437 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:03 am to


"Expert"

Cato Institute. No thanks.
Posted by SUB
Member since Jan 2001
Member since Jan 2009
21046 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:05 am to
quote:

trains simply cannot compete against the convenience of taking your car where you want to go when you want to go there.


Wow, just a whole lot of stupid right there. People love the "convenience" of sitting in traffic for 2+ hours every day instead of whizzing by it all on a train.
This post was edited on 2/1/16 at 10:06 am
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
33021 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Add to this the fact that self-driving cars are likely to become a reality before this project is completed, and the market for such trains will be insignificant.


Whatever happened to the flying cars I was promised in the 80's? All I get are crappy self driving cars?!
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127102 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:06 am to
quote:

wouldn't it sink in the swamp?
No, but it might tip the swamp over.....
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84453 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Wow, just a whole lot of stupid right there. People love the "convenience" of sitting in traffic for 2+ hours every day instead of whizzing by it all on a train.


Trains won't work here It's really not that complicated to get. Our area is much too large with a population density that is much too small. It doesn't take a Rhodes Scholar to figure out.
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Wow, just a whole lot of stupid right there.





so you thought you'd outdo him?




quote:

People love the "convenience" of sitting in traffic for 2+ hours every day instead of whizzing by it all on a train.


no people love the convenience of going and coming on their own schedule and having the freedom of stopping anytime/anywhere they want on a whim, instead of being stuck on a train and its schedule.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36428 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Cato Institute. No thanks.


Shooting the messenger what a novel approach.

Can you rebut what he is saying, or you just dismiss his point of view because he's not following the party line?
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36428 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Wow, just a whole lot of stupid right there. People love the "convenience" of sitting in traffic for 2+ hours every day instead of whizzing by it all on a train.


Put up your 44 dollars per trip and hop aboard, oh wait you want me to put up money so you can ride for 13 bucks a trip!!!!!

You guys are something else.
Posted by iliveinabox
in a box
Member since Aug 2011
24115 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:16 am to
Amtrak is fairly nice, wouldn't mind riding something like that to br/houston/laffy
Posted by SundayFunday
Member since Sep 2011
9322 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:21 am to
(no message)
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
67023 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:22 am to
quote:

self-driving cars are likely to become a reality before this project is completed


Uber on steroids
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29271 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:30 am to
yeah but louisianians love to piss away taxpayer dollars.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18689 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 10:34 am to
Trains like these only really work when they connect areas that are walking friendly, or if each city has an efficient public transportation system.

The guy is right about the convenience of your own vehicle. I wouldn't want to take a train down to NO, only to have to pay for cabs everywhere.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram