Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

New Mississippi River bridge makes earmarks list in new congressional highway bill

Posted on 6/10/21 at 4:14 pm
Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
17353 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 4:14 pm
quote:

New Mississippi River bridge makes earmarks list in congressional highway bill



LINK
While much attention of late has been focused on the uncertain fate of President Biden’s massive infrastructure stimulus package, currently stalled on Capitol Hill, a congressional committee worked literally through the night on a separate bill that includes money for specific bridge and highway projects in Louisiana, including a new Mississippi River bridge in Baton Rouge.

At 5 a.m., the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee wrapped up a 22-hour “mark -up” hearing on a $547 billion, five-year surface transportation reauthorization bill, known as INVEST, that includes earmarks for specific congressional projects for the first time in 16 years.

Congress brought back the controversial earmark process this year.


quote:

President Joe Biden and congressional Republicans have been negotiating for weeks over the price tag of a bill to pay for building and repairing scores of aging and failing highways, bridges and transit systems.

It’s unclear if they’ll be able to reach a consensus, and if not, if Democrats will be able to push through a major transportation bill without GOP support.

Still, local transportation lobbyists say they’re encouraged to see Louisiana projects being prioritized.


About 1/3 of the infrastructure spending bill will actually go to infrastructure projects - and a fraction of that will go to highway projects. It's likely that Louisiana republicans would support the bill if it includes earmarks for things like the Lake Charles I-10 bridge replacement or the new bridge over the Mississippi River south of Baton Rouge. Still highly unlikely to get funded in this manner given the makeup on capitol hill.
This post was edited on 6/10/21 at 4:27 pm
Posted by 0x15E
Outer Space
Member since Sep 2020
14735 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 4:16 pm to
It will never be ready in time
Posted by NoShow
Member since Feb 2013
2339 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 4:16 pm to
Anyone over 40 will never live to drive on it IF it is ever built.
Posted by Beessnax
Member since Nov 2015
11130 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 4:17 pm to
Someone should count up how many times this lie has been told to taxpayers
Posted by WinnPtiger
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2011
25002 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

About 1/3th of the infrastructure spending bill will actually go to infrastructure projects


stop reading bigot
Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
17353 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Someone should count up how many times this lie has been told to taxpayers



It's factually correct that the earmark from the bridge is included in a highway funding bill.

It's just not all that likely it will stay that way after congress finishes horse trading.
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17716 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

About 1/3th of the infrastructure spending bill will actually go to infrastructure projects - and a fraction of that will go to highway projects. It's likely that Louisiana republicans would support the bill if it includes earmarks for things like the Lake Charles I-10 bridge replacement or the new bridge over the Mississippi River south of Baton Rouge. Still highly unlikely to get funded in this manner given the makeup on capitol hill.



Jesus Christ Op
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122169 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 4:24 pm to
If I were to ever become governor of Louisiana my first priority would be to make sure this state has some of the best roads in the country.. I'd be aggressive with this and crime.

I'd probably piss off people in order to get it done and not get elected to a second term, but between the roads and crime.. This shite is out of control.
Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
17353 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Jesus Christ Op


corrected
This post was edited on 6/10/21 at 4:27 pm
Posted by BZ504
Texas
Member since Oct 2005
13626 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 4:26 pm to
How much of that money will go towards studies? Gotta study the project first a few times before any actual building gets done. Gotta do it the right way and that is with a study.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12847 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

How much of that money will go towards studies? Gotta study the project first a few times before any actual building gets done. Gotta do it the right way and that is with a study.

I realize the idea of “studies” has turned into a meme around here, but it’s getting a little silly.

Do you know what happens when the private sector takes on a project of this size? Let’s use construction of a chemical plant/unit as an example. First they do a feasibility analysis to determine which conceptual projects are worth funding. This requires analysis of preliminary site location options, development of a business case (ROI, market analysis, etc.), and development of a preliminary schedule and budget.

Then, they do a planning analysis to shore up how they will build it. This typically involves a more detailed preliminary design, more detailed budget, preliminary schedule and execution plan, and further analysis of the return on investment.

Then they do a “final” analysis that is even more detailed. This typically involves detailed design of some semi-final engineering deliverables, development of detailed specs and equipment lists, HAZOP analysis, detailed schedules, startup plan, and a +/- 10% budget (among other things).

THEN the company makes their final investment decision authorizing construction.

I intentionally used the word “analysis” here. You know what another word for analysis is? You guessed it - a study.

This process (“front end loading” / FEL or “front end engineering design” / FEED) is a pretty basic project management principle, and it’s important because it keeps people from making bad decisions that they can’t unfrick at a later date.

So yes, I hope they do a “study” or two before haphazardly blowing $2 billion on a useless bridge.
Posted by Ignignot
Member since Mar 2009
18823 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 8:27 pm to
Somebody's going to be pissed if they don't do a study before this
Posted by ellishughtiger
70118
Member since Jul 2004
21182 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 8:33 pm to
The useless Audubon bridge came up quickly
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
35934 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 8:49 pm to
There already is a "new bridge". I guess now we'll have

"The old bridge"
"The new bridge"
"The newer bridge"
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George, LA
Member since Aug 2004
80693 posts
Posted on 6/10/21 at 9:17 pm to
quote:


"The old bridge"
"The new bridge"
"The new new bridge"
"The newest bridge"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram