- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nazi Heinrich Himmler switches between man and monster in newly discovered diary
Posted on 8/3/16 at 8:34 am to TutHillTiger
Posted on 8/3/16 at 8:34 am to TutHillTiger
quote:
BTW, all the occult groups disappeared before end of the war.
Nah... we just went underground
Posted on 8/3/16 at 8:39 am to terd ferguson
quote:
Nah... we just went underground
Shhhhhhhhh!
You're going to get your occult card revoked again.
Posted on 8/3/16 at 8:48 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Hess was the Reichfuhrer (second to Hitler)
Deputy Führer, number 3 behind Goering (Reichsmarshall). Himmler was Reichsfuhrer SS.
And Hoss' written remarks from captivity were extracted via torture under the Soviets so the sincerity or accuracy is in question. Eichmann himself called his figures wildly exaggerated and to this day historians do not accept a death figure of 3 million at Auschwitz. Closer to 1 to 1.5.
Posted on 8/3/16 at 9:02 am to ChewyDante
quote:You're correct of course - Hess is the only person to hold the office in the Third Reich - he was not replaced after his flight to Scotland. I can't explain why I typed Reichfuhrer or whatever, other than it sounds more "German."
Deputy Führer
quote:
Goering (Reichsmarshall).
And vice-chancellor. By influence, Goering was #2 for much of the Nazi era - but, after the invasion of Poland, Hitler promoted Hess to the #2 spot. Of course, to keep the dogs competing for his attention, he deliberately kept his intentions vague. Hitler didn't trust Goering. Goebbels thought of himself as second in command (on a good day, the de facto leader of the Third Reich) - and at the end, when Goering, Himmler and others were unreliable and unavailable, even Bormann (who replaced Hess as Hitler's private secretary) slipped into one of those "arguable" spots - since he was always present.
ETA: Something we forget about Hess, too, is that he held the #2 spot in the SS (well, #3 if you count Hitler, then Himmler) - interesting for someone considered "less" Nazi among the Nazi elite.
This post was edited on 8/3/16 at 9:06 am
Posted on 8/3/16 at 9:05 am to Kujo
quote:
maybe .....it didn't happen?
You should be banned, but that's just me
Posted on 8/3/16 at 9:18 am to drexyl
quote:
I have heard of holocaust deniers before but never actual ran into one - even over the internet. Wow.
A guy from Turkey that was in engineering school with us denied it. Claimed Hitler was a great man.... Middle easterners definitely were taught a different point of view concerning the second world war. Especially when it comes to the atrocities committed by the Nazis.
Posted on 8/3/16 at 9:25 am to HMTVBrian2
quote:
The reality is that he WAS a man. It's easy to portray the nazis, especially the leadership, as uncaring, unthinking monsters...but they were just people going through their lives.
Yeah, but it involves genocide. Plus they hired monsters like Josef Mengele to implement their policies, so I do think most of the leadership of the Nazi party was evil.
Posted on 8/3/16 at 9:34 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Yeah, but it involves genocide.
It's more frightening to imagine ordinary Germans doing this than "monsters" of legend, frankly. For those who haven't watched Judgment at Nuremberg (a critically acclaimed film of a fictionalized account of the so-called "Judge's trial" - some months after the big top Nazi trial) - there is a scene with the prisoners eating, Lampe (played by Colonel Klink actor, Werner Klemperer, a Jew who escaped Nazi Germany himself, IRL) - discusses the concentration camp footage and evidence of the scope of the Holocaust that has just been presented:
Werner Lampe: You do not think it was like that, do you? [the other defendants are silent] There were executions, yes, but nothing like that. Nothing at all! [turns to another prisoner] Pöhl. Pöhl! You ran those concentration camps, you and Eichmann. They say we killed millions of people. [scoffs] Millions of people! How could it be possible? Tell them, how could it be possible?
Pöhl: [matter-of-fact] It's possible.
Werner Lampe: [aghast] How?
Pöhl: You mean, technically? It all depends on your facilities. Say you have two chambers to accommodate 2000 people apiece. Figure it out. It's possible to get rid of 10,000 in a half hour. You don't even need knives to do it. You can tell them they're going to take a shower, then instead of water, you turn on the gas. It's not the killing that's the problem, it's disposing of the bodies. That's the problem.
And so horrific that it is easier for some folks to believe it didn't happen at all.
This post was edited on 8/3/16 at 9:36 am
Posted on 8/3/16 at 10:19 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Yeah, but it involves genocide. Plus they hired monsters like Josef Mengele to implement their policies, so I do think most of the leadership of the Nazi party was evil
The notion that people like Mengele were high ranking figures in Nazi circles or were well known by leading figures or hand selected to carry out work in the camps is a myth.
Mengele was a medical officer in the SS on the Eastern Front and was sent to Auschwitz after being wounded. His activities at Auschwitz, whatever they were, outside of his official duties were of his own. Believe it or not, as policy, cruelty, sadism, and personal profit at the expense of prisoners was forbidden. Of course it took place anyhow as cruelty and corruption cannot be prevented in such circumstances. Himmler actually ordered SS Judge Dr. Konrad Morgen to launch an internal investigation of improprieties taking place throughout the camp system as reports of cruelty and theft of property (which was deemed to belong to the state) were rampant.
This actually resulted in a number of indictments, convictions, and death sentences handed out to camp officials and lead to Morgen's uncovering of the genocide taking place at a few "bizarre" camps in Poland. It's important to recognize that the death camp process was kept very secretive and cloaked in ambiguous language.
It's a difficult concept for many to internalize, but as Himmler's Posen speech clearly demonstrates, the idea was that the SS was being handed an incredibly difficult but necessary task that necessitated order and discipline. Sadism was strictly forbidden. They did not see themselves as barbarians, the opposite really. It's a paradoxical concept but the genocide of the Jews was supposed to unfold in a pitiless, yet business like fashion. Germans were actually removed from the killing process at the camps in as great a degree as practicable, using foreign eastern collaborators and even inmates themselves.
The Nazi leadership and their bureacrats weren't cartoon villains. This is one of the fundamental premises of Hannah Arendt's notion of the "banality of evil" uncovered in her study of Eichmann and the machinations of Nazi systematic killings. This is another concept that appears incredibly difficult for many people to grasp or accept.
Posted on 8/3/16 at 10:59 am to ChewyDante
Hoss'"written remarks" were not extracted via torture under the Soviets. There are several widely accepted books, one being The Nazi Hunters, that detail exactly how his memoirs came to be. Those memoirs themselves have been published in the form of "Hoss' Diaries" and the book is quite explicit as to what happened. Hoss was waiting sentencing after being convicted, and over that lengthy period, his American "warden" convinced him to write his confession.He was imprisoned in Poland but he had an international defense team, as well as an international prosecutors team. He was hung on the same gallows at Auschiwtz that he had used to murder thousands. He never repented but wrote quite explicitdly about what he was responsible for. As for tha speech that Himmler gave, several Nazi witnesses, present at the time, gave the same version to investigators & it has been published, in full, in numerous books, one being "Himmler's Diaries". It is worth noting that the one gassing Himmler did witness, he became violently ill afterwards & never witnessed another murder.
Posted on 8/3/16 at 11:09 am to ChewyDante
ChewyDante, there is a book out there, in most book stores, titled "Auschiwtz. It is the complete history of the camp. Its pages are filled with accounts from everyone involved in the camp, including numerous accounts by SS members. From account after account from survivors, it is more than clear that the SS was not "actually removed from the killing process at the camps in as great a degree as possible." "Sadism was strictly forbidden"? Read the history of Sobibor. Triblenka. Dachau. When it happened time after time in camp after camp for yrs, I am not sure where this policy you reference actually came from. But it was the German SS who were witnessed throwing live children into the ovens, the burning fires, smashing babies' heads against brick wall by swinging them by their feet. Himmler himself directed the SS to train their dogs to "tear human beings apart". etc etc etc
Popular
Back to top

1






