- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NASA: Humans will prove we are not alone in the universe within 20 years.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:03 pm to TheIndulger
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:03 pm to TheIndulger
quote:
I mean 100 billion stars in our galaxy alone? And there are billions upon billions of galaxies.. We can say the numbers, but I really believe no one can truly put into their mind's perspective how big that really is.
Not to get off topic, but I always think this when talking about this country's deficit, debt, and unfunded future liabilities.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:27 pm to Volvagia
quote:
I bet you haven't even heard of the Alcubierre drive either.....
Hugely impractical considering our currently ability, yes.
Physically impossible?
Nope.
Dark Matter bruh. Once we figure that shite out we're golden.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:35 pm to Volvagia
quote:
Please tell me what law of physics that prohibits interstellar travel.
I bet you haven't even heard of the Alcubierre drive either.....
Hugely impractical considering our currently ability, yes.
Physically impossible?
Nope.
uh, the alcubierre drive requires something with negative mass. not antimatter. negative mass. which isn't even known to exist. the dude who proposed it suggested that the cassini effect could provide the negative energy requirement in lieu of the negative mass, but it's still conjecture. the math and physics to bear this out have not been developed yet.
and that's without even touching on the fact that travelling faster than light violates causality.
so yes, there are good chances that building an alcubierre drive is physically impossible. the physics problems surrounding it haven't been resolved yet, so i wouldn't go around claiming that it's physically possible.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:39 pm to gorillacoco
quote:
so yes, there are good chances that building an alcubierre drive is physically impossible. the physics problems surrounding it haven't been resolved yet, so i wouldn't go around claiming that it's physically possible.
He didn't say it was physically possible. He said it wasn't physically impossible.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:40 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
he numbers really are crazy if you try to really grasp the scope of the known universe.
after that, I like to spend some time pondering what is beyond the known universe. I struggle considering a truly infinite area without any physical boundaries. what is on the edge of the universe? what is that border made of? how think is it? what is on the other side of it. There's almost a primal fear of something being truly boundless.
Discussions like this really make you wonder "what the frick am I doing?" I am so insignificant and have such a short time on this planet, why am I spending it in a cubicle 40 hours a week? Why do I give a shite what some person thinks about me? Why do I get mad over such trivial things?
Not that these particular things relate to me, but for people as a whole.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:44 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Here's a mind blowing fact: if you travel at light speed, end to end, across the milky way, it would take 100,000 years.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:45 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Oh my bad. I meant to say: unless a conjecture about a poorly understood phenomenon somehow pans out, or a particle with negative mass is discovered, it is physically impossible. and not to mention violates causality.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:47 pm to gorillacoco
quote:
conjecture about a poorly understood phenomenon
I thought that was basically what all physics is based upon
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:52 pm to TheIndulger
quote:
I actually don't think humans are capable of comprehending something so vast. I mean 100 billion stars in our galaxy alone?
We aren't. How far does this go? What's on the other side of where it stops?
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:52 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
most physics is based on theories that have been vetted out by observed phenomena. theoretical physics would be based on conjecture but not yet verified by observation.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:53 pm to Redbone
quote:
What's on the other side of where it stops?
Heaven
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:57 pm to SaintLSUnAtl
quote:
Is there a religion that says there is no life outside of earth?
There is a religion that says there is another world out there with life forms similar to our own. It already has a name, heaven.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:58 pm to Redbone
i'm not saying that heaven doesn't exist, but is it necessary to your beliefs that it exists somewhere in this universe? i always imagined that (if i weren't mostly agnostic) it would exist sort of in another reality. and i'm not opposed to religion, but i never thought people believed heaven was a place that was physically in the same realm as the earth. if you're trolling, good job. if not, i am honestly curious.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:59 pm to gorillacoco
quote:
i'm not saying that heaven doesn't exist, but is it necessary to your beliefs that it exists somewhere in this universe? i always imagined that (if i weren't mostly agnostic) it would exist sort of in another reality. and i'm not opposed to religion, but i never thought people believed heaven was a place that was physically in the same realm as the earth. if you're trolling, good job. if not, i am honestly curious.
I think the general consensus is that it's in another realm.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 12:59 pm to 70345
quote:
Here's a mind blowing fact: if you travel at light speed
Light speed will not be enough. Theory is you can't travel faster than light
Posted on 7/16/14 at 1:00 pm to 70345
quote:
Here's a mind blowing fact: if you travel at light speed, end to end, across the milky way, it would take 100,000 years.
And the worlds out there may not even exist anymore.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 1:01 pm to gorillacoco
quote:
alcubierre drive ..... the math and physics to bear this out have not been developed yet.
People around B.R. and NOLA haven't even figured out how to use the wheel yet ... the steering wheel.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 1:01 pm to Crawdaddy
quote:
Theory is you can't travel faster than light
You can't, but we'll get around this by warping space-time around us. Basically the spaceship will stay in the same place but move time and space around itself.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 1:04 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
He didn't say it was physically possible. He said it wasn't physically impossible.
Winner winner.
I think he needs to go back and see to whom I was replying to.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 1:05 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
You can't, but we'll get around this by warping space-time around us. Basically the spaceship will stay in the same place but move time and space around itself.
i have to admit, the alcubierre drive is a pretty cool idea whether it's possible or not. it really crushes me to think that FTL travel is not possible, but as you mentioned there's some long shot physics that might bear it out, but i wouldn't have my hopes up. even if it is possible i don't think they'd even come close to it in our lifetimes.
it's a pretty lonely universe without FTL travel though.
Popular
Back to top



0



