- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NASA baws meeting up at Sonic over Opportunity rover
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:18 pm
LINK
Mars just had a planet wide dust storm and they’re debating on whether to try and save Opportunity because of costs
Members of Opportunity’s engineering team recommended a different plan, the person close to the mission says. Their idea was to actively try to communicate with Opportunity until the end of January 2019 — the end of the seasonal cleaning period. After that, they suggested passive listening until the end of 2019. But these recommendations were ignored by management in order to save money, this person says, meaning the agency could be risking abandoning a still-functioning rover. The Opportunity team reportedly didn’t receive formal notice of the plan until “minutes before JPL published its press release,” according to The Atlantic.
...
NASA’s plan is “100% Grade A B.S.,” former Opportunity flight director Mike Seibert said on Twitter. “[T]he amount of time given to recover Opportunity is woefully insufficient. Whomever made this decision is a coward.” Someone at NASA “has to be trying to kill the mission for non-technical reasons,” he said.
“I will guaran-damn-tee you this decision is not consistent with the engineering recommendation from the team,” Scott Maxwell, a former Opportunity operator, tweeted. “They’re far too good at their jobs to have crafted anything so ridiculous.”
Mars just had a planet wide dust storm and they’re debating on whether to try and save Opportunity because of costs
Members of Opportunity’s engineering team recommended a different plan, the person close to the mission says. Their idea was to actively try to communicate with Opportunity until the end of January 2019 — the end of the seasonal cleaning period. After that, they suggested passive listening until the end of 2019. But these recommendations were ignored by management in order to save money, this person says, meaning the agency could be risking abandoning a still-functioning rover. The Opportunity team reportedly didn’t receive formal notice of the plan until “minutes before JPL published its press release,” according to The Atlantic.
...
NASA’s plan is “100% Grade A B.S.,” former Opportunity flight director Mike Seibert said on Twitter. “[T]he amount of time given to recover Opportunity is woefully insufficient. Whomever made this decision is a coward.” Someone at NASA “has to be trying to kill the mission for non-technical reasons,” he said.
“I will guaran-damn-tee you this decision is not consistent with the engineering recommendation from the team,” Scott Maxwell, a former Opportunity operator, tweeted. “They’re far too good at their jobs to have crafted anything so ridiculous.”
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:20 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
“I will guaran-damn-tee you this decision is not consistent with the engineering recommendation from the team,” Scott Maxwell, a former Opportunity operator, tweeted. “They’re far too good at their jobs to have crafted anything so ridiculous.”
Sweet melt, Scott. You sound like a fig.
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:23 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
save money
I’m always for government doing this.
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:26 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
quote:
save money
I’m always for government doing this.
Lol, the government saving money on something doesn't mean not spending, it just means spending elsewhere. So it seems cheaper to try to salvage what's left than to start on a new project. Don't really know any details though.
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:28 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
That’s not the case though. I’ve got the feeling the powers that be at NASA are itching to move onto the next cool thing. We have a rover on another planet that potentially can be saved, we should take that chance. The cost to do so is pennies compared to the money pit of the ISS and probably returns more actual science, given the cost of development and delivery it would be crazy not to.
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:43 pm to DavidTheGnome
I wonder what it cost to keep the program going another year.
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:48 pm to DavidTheGnome
How the frick does it take months to establish communications when the planet is light minutes away?
Sounds like someone doesn't want to admit their toy is dead.
Sounds like someone doesn't want to admit their toy is dead.
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:52 pm to PrivatePublic
The rover is in hibernation and they have to wait until a wind blows all the dust it’s accumulated off to power back up.
This was several years back LINK
This was several years back LINK
Posted on 9/4/18 at 10:00 pm to DavidTheGnome
Mike Seibert of NASA with regard to Opportunity-
He's going the distance.
He's going for speed.
She's all alone
In her time of need.
Because he's racing and pacing and plotting the course,
He's fighting and biting and riding on his horse.
He's racing and pacing and plotting the course,
He's fighting and biting and riding on his horse.
He's going the distance.
He's going for speed.
He's going the distance.
He's going the distance.
He's going for speed.
She's all alone
In her time of need.
Because he's racing and pacing and plotting the course,
He's fighting and biting and riding on his horse.
He's racing and pacing and plotting the course,
He's fighting and biting and riding on his horse.
He's going the distance.
He's going for speed.
He's going the distance.
Posted on 9/4/18 at 10:41 pm to DavidTheGnome
Martian carjacked it. This is their cover story.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 12:41 am to DavidTheGnome
This rover is a marvel of modern engineering. It was only supposed to last 90 days and we are well over 5,000 martian days. This program can gladly use my tax money.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:31 am to TigerFanInSouthland
NASA’s entire budget is a mere sliver compared to what is spent elsewhere by FedGov.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 6:00 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:Its robot running around on a barren planet collecting dirt. I’d rather spend the money on real exploration.
That’s not the case though. I’ve got the feeling the powers that be at NASA are itching to move onto the next cool thing. We have a rover on another planet that potentially can be saved, we should take that chance. The cost to do so is pennies compared to the money pit of the ISS and probably returns more actual science, given the cost of development and delivery it would be crazy not to.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 7:25 am to jmarto1
quote:
This rover is a marvel of modern engineering. It was only supposed to last 90 days and we are well over 5,000 martian days. This program can gladly use my tax money.
Better than using it to build more slums and crime.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 7:34 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
I’d rather spend the money on real exploration
Hate to break it to you baw, but this
quote:
Its robot running around on a barren planet collecting dirt.
Is what 99.99999999% of robots that can find planets/moons with hospitable surfaces are going to be doing.
And there are no planets/moons with habitable atmospheres to look at plants and water within reach in a human lifespan (if they even exist), so this will definitely be all you’ll see
JPL has done excellent work on probes and rovers lately. The couple of Mars rovers, Cassini at Saturn, and New Horizons at Pluto have all been stunning successes backed by solid design, engineering, and science.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 7:44 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Over that time it survived some scares, including a previous dust storm in 2007. But the storm it faced this summer was the most massive one Mars has seen in decades.
Global warming is Real!!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News