Started By
Message
locked post

NASA Administrator to Announce New Moon to Mars Partnerships with US Companies

Posted on 11/28/18 at 7:49 pm
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31591 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 7:49 pm
LINK

NASA invites media to its headquarters in Washington for the announcement of new Moon partnerships with American companies at 2 p.m. EST Thursday, Nov. 29. NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine will make the announcement, which will air live on NASA Television and the agency's website.

Working with U.S. companies is the next step to achieving long-term scientific study and human exploration of the Moon and Mars.

In addition to the administrator and future partners to be announced, participants in the event include:

Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, Washington
Stan Love, NASA astronaut, NASA’s Johnson Space Center, Houston
Andrea Mosie, Apollo sample laboratory manager, Johnson
Barbara Cohen, associate project scientist for Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
FIRST Robotics students from the Washington area
To attend in person or receive dial-in information, media must send a request with their name, affiliation and phone number to JoAnna Wendel at joanna.r.wendel@nasa.gov no later than noon on Thursday.

The event also will be available through Facebook Live, Twitch TV, YouTube, and Twitter/Periscope. The public may ask questions on Twitter by using the hashtag #askNASA or by leaving a comment on the livestream of the event on the NASA Facebook page.

Under Space Policy Directive-1, the agency will lead an innovative and sustainable exploration of the Moon together with commercial and international partners.

-end-

LINK

NASA has provided few details about its announcement but said "future partners" will be named.

Space-industry sources say the event will name 11 small companies that will be eligible to compete for millions of dollars in future NASA contracts.

Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31591 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 7:52 pm to
Moon to Mars

Transition U.S. human spaceflight in low-Earth orbit to commercial operations, which support NASA and the needs of an emerging private sector market.
Extend long-duration U.S. human spaceflight operations to lunar orbit.
Enable long-term robotic exploration of the Moon.
Enable human exploration of the Moon as preparation for human missions to Mars and deeper into the solar system.



Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
76146 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 7:53 pm to
LucasP dreamt of traveling to Mars.

Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 7:53 pm to
We first have to go back to the Moon to go to Mars. We need a base there to launch our interstellar ambitions. We must first master the Moon before going to Mars. There’s so much more shite that can go wrong on the later than the former. And launching from the Moon to Mars would be far cheaper and more practical. We could produce fuel on the Moon for the Mars operation, which is key to it and our species success.
Posted by summersausage
Member since Jul 2010
2005 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 7:57 pm to
NB4 aliens
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31591 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 7:58 pm to
I’m fine with doing neither and focusing on unmanned until we develop a better/cheaper method to orbit....but...if we do commit to it, stay frickin committed. Don’t let the next administration or Congress go nah we don’t want that, do this instead. NASA just becomes this extremely expensive political ping pong ball that suffers from political changes.
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 7:59 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

NASA just becomes this extremely expensive political ping pong ball that suffers from political changes.


NASA’s current budget is less than the National ink budget, so I’m not going to accept that shite.
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 8:00 pm
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 11/29/18 at 7:30 am to
If we are serious about long-term, deep space exploration, shouldn't we be sending un-manned but maneuverable supply vessels into space now?

If we start sending food, medical supplies, etc. that can be retrieved at a later time it might cover any possible emergency contingency and maximize room for any manned missions to follow.

Is my Deep Space Wagon Train idea stupid or doable?
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
45420 posts
Posted on 11/29/18 at 7:35 am to
We can't even take good pictures of distance habital planets yet. We need to focus on the planning phase of space exploration before we start sending meat to space.
Posted by Loaner1231
Violet, LA
Member since Jan 2016
3903 posts
Posted on 11/29/18 at 8:49 am to
quote:

if we do commit to it, stay frickin committed. Don’t let the next administration or Congress go nah we don’t want that, do this instead. NASA just becomes this extremely expensive political ping pong ball that suffers from political changes.


MAGA for the moon
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
50767 posts
Posted on 11/29/18 at 8:51 am to
there is nothing on the moon that would facilitate future manned exploration of mars. A semi permanent base on the moon would require 100% support and supply from earth...that’s fine if the moon is your goal but useless regarding mars

there is no “fuel” to be extracted on the moon and just a small amount of water. The moon is light earth crust containing no known minerals or metals suitable for sustaining a base or acting as a jump off point. Any trip to mars would still require a gravity assist from earth

the moon is a dead useless rock. We should be focusing on near earth asteroids which generally contain useful material that could be mined and provide a much more useful environment for future sustainable mars exploration
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 11/29/18 at 8:55 am to
quote:

If we are serious about long-term, deep space exploration, shouldn't we be sending un-manned but maneuverable supply vessels into space now?


What do you mean by "deep space exploration"? Surely we're not prepared to look beyond the solar system for quite a while. Once we have colonies multiple locations in the solar system maybe then we can start thinking about sending more than probes outside.
Posted by Loaner1231
Violet, LA
Member since Jan 2016
3903 posts
Posted on 11/29/18 at 9:12 am to
Something like the Alcubierre Warp Drive being developed would be the most amazing thing ever. I doubt I'll live to see interstellar travel, and its very possible humans traveling beyond our closest celestial neighbors is something that will never be achieved.
Posted by Asharad
Tiamat
Member since Dec 2010
6354 posts
Posted on 11/29/18 at 9:23 am to
The moon is fake.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
50767 posts
Posted on 11/29/18 at 9:42 am to
quote:

its very possible humans traveling beyond our closest celestial neighbors is something that will never be achieved.

more than possible and likely probable
the distances are too vast for a biological being to overcome
I see this as a good thing...we have one home so we better take care of it
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71720 posts
Posted on 11/29/18 at 9:50 am to
I could see us colonizing as far as the asteroid belt ala The Expanse. But I don't see us getting much further than that.

Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
50767 posts
Posted on 11/29/18 at 11:55 am to
quote:

I could see us colonizing as far as the asteroid belt

which should be the goal, not the moon.
we already know that asteroids in the belt contain immeasurable fortunes in resources that we can actually use in space AND make exploration commercially viable

the moon is just a resource sink, good for nothing other than tourism
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 11/29/18 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

What do you mean by "deep space exploration"?


Apologies, I mean within the Solar System.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
106030 posts
Posted on 11/29/18 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

If we are serious about long-term, deep space exploration, shouldn't we be sending un-manned but maneuverable supply vessels into space now?

If we start sending food, medical supplies, etc. that can be retrieved at a later time it might cover any possible emergency contingency and maximize room for any manned missions to follow.

Is my Deep Space Wagon Train idea stupid or doable?




Hypothetically we send an unmanned supply ship to linkup with in 20 years. In the meantime there's a quantum leap in technology that renders everything we sent obsolete. Not shitting on your idea, they will probably end up doing something like that, just pointing out one of the problems with it.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
50767 posts
Posted on 11/29/18 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Hypothetically we send an unmanned supply ship to linkup with in 20 years. In the meantime there's a quantum leap in technology that renders everything we sent obsolete.

"the martian" had the basics right (according to the smart people) but they glossed over the hard part...getting all that heavy (in mass) infrastructure down to the surface of the planet. think about that giant rover they had...certainly that was sent down ahead, perhaps in parts even, but the physics of getting that payload off of earth, then to mars, then down to the surface is pretty fricking daunting. we dont know how to do that yet within the confines of economics and landing technology

multiply that by the hab facility, all the other equipment/food/water/etc, and then understand that we still dont have spacesuit tech to make it safe enough to spend multiple days on mars, and you see how far away we really are

in other words, there is very little possibility that we could explore/habitate mars with the astronauts being 100% depending on supply & support from earth. thats why in my view we need to forget the moon and go to the belt first. there is water, fuel and raw materials there
This post was edited on 11/29/18 at 12:26 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram