- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nakamoto story about Council on Aging will FRAUD (video added)
Posted on 3/31/17 at 10:30 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/31/17 at 10:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
odds are she developed a relationship with the old lady, the old lady had issues with her family, and it kind of evolved into this.
The old lady may not been in her right mind when all of this went down.
1
Posted on 3/31/17 at 10:35 am to MontyFranklyn
i do not think that's how it works
being denoted as an "owner" of a checking account is more of a regulatory declaration, kind of like a car's registration. sure, it gives some evidence as to the potential ownership, but that can easily be refuted.
i'm no expert in this area, but i seriously do not believe that being registered as a "co-owner" of a banking account automatically gives you actual ownership over the incorporeal moveable property within the account
being denoted as an "owner" of a checking account is more of a regulatory declaration, kind of like a car's registration. sure, it gives some evidence as to the potential ownership, but that can easily be refuted.
i'm no expert in this area, but i seriously do not believe that being registered as a "co-owner" of a banking account automatically gives you actual ownership over the incorporeal moveable property within the account
Posted on 3/31/17 at 10:38 am to c on z
The fact of the matter here is that that money should go to the fricking GRANDCHILDREN, as it was intended, and not some greedy woman (Tasha). Tasha is going to get a fricking 1/3 of the money, which is insane. The old lady gets hosed by a woman that is supposed to be protecting old people! WTF
Posted on 3/31/17 at 10:50 am to Jim Smith
if the elderly woman just has $300k or whatever in savings or investments of some sort and a house/car or whatever, what in god's green earth would justify an executor, let alone one that would be paid that much for that long? it doesn't seem like a complex estate to manage at all
*ETA: if that's the going rate, it's a racket and i'm in the wrong business
*ETA: if that's the going rate, it's a racket and i'm in the wrong business
This post was edited on 3/31/17 at 10:51 am
Posted on 3/31/17 at 10:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:This is certainly possible. It happens alot, especially with older men with money. The older widower men find a much younger chick to trick off on and the kids get absolutely pissed about it.
odds are she developed a relationship with the old lady, the old lady had issues with her family, and it kind of evolved into this. i don't think she was truly trying to swindle the elderly woman's estate, BUT she should have known better. the attorney nCERTAINLY should have known better
Posted on 3/31/17 at 10:54 am to MontyFranklyn
yeah there is certainly a method to grooming elderly people to get money from their estate when they die. that's why the laws on this are typically interpreted so broadly and why that white paper specifically listed that behavior as a sign of elder abuse
*ETA: like i said earlier. this case may not be a crime and it may not be illegal or a conflict, but if i were in tha place i wouldn't take the chance
*ETA: like i said earlier. this case may not be a crime and it may not be illegal or a conflict, but if i were in tha place i wouldn't take the chance
This post was edited on 3/31/17 at 10:56 am
Posted on 3/31/17 at 11:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:A co-owner on an account has legal grounds to the money as if it were theirs. The courts really have no ground on it because it is a simple designation of ownership in the titles.
i do not think that's how it works
being denoted as an "owner" of a checking account is more of a regulatory declaration, kind of like a car's registration. sure, it gives some evidence as to the potential ownership, but that can easily be refuted.
i'm no expert in this area, but i seriously do not believe that being registered as a "co-owner" of a banking account automatically gives you actual ownership over the incorporeal moveable property within the account
Posted on 3/31/17 at 11:12 am to MontyFranklyn
I wonder when clark-anwar will be heading off for a THREE month PAID sabbatical ala "judge" judy white ?
Damn B.R. is just over-flowing with black political do-gooders...LOL !
WHEN, oh when will the crackdown finally begin ?
Damn B.R. is just over-flowing with black political do-gooders...LOL !
WHEN, oh when will the crackdown finally begin ?
Posted on 3/31/17 at 11:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
if the elderly woman just has $300k or whatever in savings or investments of some sort and a house/car or whatever, what in god's green earth would justify an executor, let alone one that would be paid that much for that long? it doesn't seem like a complex estate to manage at all *ETA: if that's the going rate, it's a racket and i'm in the wrong business
I'm no expert, but I've handled a few probate cases in TN. If Louisiana is anything like TN, the beneficiaries just need to contest this will. I doubt a probate judge (unless maybe that judge is friends with this woman's mother who I understand to be some kind of a judge in LA?) would uphold that will if it wasn't written until that woman was in her 90's, even if the judge upholds the will 1/3 of an estate under $500K is definitely not the going rate, not even in the realm of the going rate on a basic simple estate like this would be. This will screams undue influence
Posted on 3/31/17 at 11:20 am to MontyFranklyn
Posted on 3/31/17 at 11:26 am to Jim Smith
This sounds like another ACORN type government agency. What a disgrace.
Posted on 3/31/17 at 11:44 am to Jim Smith
quote:
Scott McKay's got a pretty good/funny take of Amar's conflict of interest.
Nice piece of work.
Posted on 3/31/17 at 11:52 am to Lsupimp
after reading the story, advocate i would say investigate the mental competence of the lady. If she really wanted her estate in trust for the grandkids, allow a faamily member to run the trust for free. Even a bank would not charge $500 per month, which is BS. The COA woman is going to burn up the trust paying herself. You can reform the will and still carry out the decedent's wishes. If you revoke the will, her kids get everything, to the exclusion of the grandkids or neices, which is not the right answer if the testatrix knew what she was doing.
Posted on 3/31/17 at 12:11 pm to Jim Smith
quote:
Scott McKay's got a pretty good/funny take of Amar's conflict of interest.
The Hayride Amar Article
Nailed it!
Posted on 3/31/17 at 12:39 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
A co-owner on an account has legal grounds to the money as if it were theirs. The courts really have no ground on it because it is a simple designation of ownership in the titles.
pretty sure you'd have to donate that money in LA
and then you'd have to pay the taxes associated with the donation
etc
Posted on 3/31/17 at 4:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
pretty sure you'd have to donate that money in LA
and then you'd have to pay the taxes associated with the donation
etc
My mom died recently. Before she died (and while she was still of sound mind) I brought her to the best elder estate lawyer in BR and her money was put into an account with her name and my name on it. ( I also had medical and legal POA, etc).
When she died the money became my sole property without having to go thru probate, using a will, etc.
Of course I did the right thing and split it with my sibling.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 10:14 am to gingerkittie
Any word on the court case today with the 19th JDC?
Posted on 4/3/17 at 10:25 am to Jim Smith
quote:
Scott McKay's got a pretty good/funny take of Amar's conflict of interest
That piece by McKay had some haymakers in it.
Got to love when he makes a statement, then backs it up with multiple quotes and evidence.
Such a nice change from the FGC's of the world that make accusations with the only proof being "Uhh, because of white people, duh."
Posted on 4/3/17 at 10:34 am to baseballmind1212
she's like a Gravy with a weave
Posted on 4/3/17 at 10:37 am to baseballmind1212
quote:
That piece by McKay had some haymakers in it.
Got to love when he makes a statement, then backs it up with multiple quotes and evidence.
Such a nice change from the FGC's of the world that make accusations with the only proof being "Uhh, because of white people, duh."
I fricking love it when Scott crushes Gravy. He makes Gravy look like such a fool, which, obviously isn't that difficult.
Page 11 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News