- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: n
Posted on 4/18/23 at 11:49 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 4/18/23 at 11:49 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Youve never toted ammo in your life.
Per 100, 762 is 1.6 lbs more than 556. Youre a pussy
Look I wasn't in the military but its been discussed plenty that weight and cost are major factors in the 5.56 choice. You are right, its not a ton. But it is there. Between the gun and ammo you are talking about removing 5-10lbs. Thats a fricking lot man.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 11:50 am to Centinel
If you believe disarmed and safe are the same thing that’s your call, bro.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:08 pm to baldona
quote:
M240 Combat Load
As an M240 gunner, you can expect to carry a combat load of 600 rounds of 7.62 mm ammunition, which weighs approximately 9.6 lbs per 100 rounds.
Note 9.6–7.4 isn’t 1.6.
quote:
For comparison: the M4 carbine combat load, which is seven 30-round magazines, weighs 7.4 pounds, and the M249 light machine gun combat load, which is three 200-round pouches, weighs 20.8 pounds.
Note the cumbersome style of toting 240B ammo is not included for full comparison.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:20 pm to jangalang
quote:
If you believe disarmed and safe are the same thing that’s your call, bro.
A disarmed population is very safe....for the state.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:23 pm to jangalang
quote:
Note 9.6–7.4 isn’t 1.6.
Youre googling, you have no practical experience, woman.
The difference on avg per 100 rds is 1.6 lbs. You are a colossal pussy.
frick, even at two lbs you are a colossal pussy. The average guy wouldnt feel a difference.
This post was edited on 4/18/23 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:37 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Youre googling, you have no practical experience, woman.
Why are you yelling and mansplaining?
quote:
The difference on avg per 100 rds is 1.6 lbs.
If you believe it then it must be true.
quote:
frick, even at two lbs you are a colossal pussy. The average guy wouldnt feel a difference.
Says the civilian that never experienced it.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:43 pm to jangalang
quote:
You know why these people don’t share my opinion.
It’s because your opinion is dogshit and you’ve yet to give any sort of logical argument to back it up.
You ignore every single question until we have to beat it out of you….and even then you give non-answers.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:47 pm to Double Oh
quote:
Any suspects yet?
This thread is completely off the rails. Where’s Tiger Fred at?
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:48 pm to jangalang
quote:
Says the civilian that never experienced it.
You quite literally just said you weren’t in the military
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:49 pm to pankReb
quote:I only ignore dumb or repetitive questions. If you were touched by this, reconsider your position.
You ignore every single question until we have to beat it out of you….and even then you give non-answers.
quote:
It’s because your opinion is dogshit and you’ve yet to give any sort of logical argument to back it up.
I mean, that’s your opinion man. High capacity magazines have already been banned once and it overall did fairly well.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:50 pm to pankReb
quote:
You quite literally just said you weren’t in the military
Your reading comprehension is extremely shallow.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:51 pm to jangalang
quote:
repetitive questions.
They’re repetitive because you refuse to answer them
quote:
High capacity magazines have already been banned once and it overall did fairly well.
You know what else has been banned? Murder. Banning something should theoretically put a stop to it right?
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:54 pm to jangalang
and you’re just an absolute idiot.
Just be honest for once….are you just trying to pull off an epic troll job?
Has this been you the entire time?
It’s honestly the only logical explanation I can come up with because you can’t seem to form a single coherent thought over the course of 20+ pages.
Just be honest for once….are you just trying to pull off an epic troll job?
Has this been you the entire time?
It’s honestly the only logical explanation I can come up with because you can’t seem to form a single coherent thought over the course of 20+ pages.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:56 pm to jangalang
quote:
Says the civilian that never experienced it.
Son, no one believes you have ever done any manly shite or touch firearms.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:57 pm to BowlJackson
quote:you're a fricking retard
BowlJackson
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:57 pm to pankReb
Show where I “literally said I wasn’t in the military.”
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:57 pm to Centinel
quote:
A disarmed population is very safe....for the state.
We should limit cars to 30 mph and make alcohol illegal again.
The state would be uber safe.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:57 pm to jangalang
quote:
Look I wasn't in the military bu
This may help you remember
Posted on 4/18/23 at 12:57 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Still waiting on him to show me wtf a 30 round clip is. 
Popular
Back to top


2







