- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I haven't
have you heard people on this board parrot the "NATO" talking points?
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:56 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Yeah, because dropping a highly specialized torpedo from an airplane wouldn't draw too much attention.
It did draw a lot of attention.
See the OP.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:56 pm to mmcgrath
More than likely that P8 was assisting in the tracking of the Oscar II Belgorod.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:57 pm to GumboPot
quote:I guess.
The going narrative it Putin will use the bombing of NS2 as propaganda to gain support on the home land.
The economic impact could have an even more deleterious effect though.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:58 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
I haven't
You haven't heard that Putin invaded Ukraine because of NATO expansion (into possibly Ukraine)?
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:58 pm to Scruffy
quote:
The economic impact could have an even more deleterious effect though.
What economic impact?
He's going to start selling petro products to Europe in 2021 levels again even with sanctions remaining?
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:58 pm to Camp Randall
quote:Bruh, from a purely international relations and political perspective, blowing up NS2 would be a brilliant move by the west.
Who needs Russian bots when they have the red team retards working diligently to out moron the blue team in geopolitical tinfoil hattery?
Way smarter than from Russia’s perspective.
The West gains massively here.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:59 pm to GumboPot
Are we sure the P-8 wasn’t around there doing analysis post explosion and the drop was a result of atmospheric interference from the venting of gas or other natural effects?
Just seems too easy. They’d never be trackable if they wanted to be hidden.
Makes more sense to use subs or SF
Just seems too easy. They’d never be trackable if they wanted to be hidden.
Makes more sense to use subs or SF
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:59 pm to Scruffy
quote:
The West gains massively here.
According to OP, they don't
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:59 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Yeah, because dropping a highly specialized torpedo from an airplane wouldn't draw too much attention.
As opposed to simply dropping a drone from a boat.
So do you think this specialized torpedo was made of cellulose to make it untraceable?
Maybe that's why biden said he wanted us to get over and investigate. Why would he say that? He said we will investigate an explosion that crippled an energy pipeline that is owned by the country we are at proxy war with.
Sit back and think about that for a second.
Not saying we did or didn't do it, but the bullshite coming out of this administration ensures me nothing is off the table.
This post was edited on 10/4/22 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You haven't heard that Putin invaded Ukraine because of NATO expansion (into possibly Ukraine)?
How about we stick to the OP. There are a million other Russia threads you can derail.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 1:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Are you implying that Russia does not lose economically with the destruction of NS2?
What economic impact?
Posted on 10/4/22 at 2:00 pm to GumboPot
Lol show me someone hit a damn pipe sitting on the ocean floor with a torpedo.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 2:00 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
How about we stick to the OP. There are a million other Russia threads you can derail.
I was just answering the question. How is that derailing anything?
I expect that talking point (why would Russia do it? there are NO reasons why) will be quite common in this thread
Posted on 10/4/22 at 2:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Then I disagree with their conclusion.
According to OP, they don't
The west, which is in a proxy war with Russia, gains significantly with the destruction of NS2 in the long term.
The short term may suck though.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 2:02 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Are you implying that Russia does not lose economically with the destruction of NS2?
Nothing was flowing through it at the time and nothing was expected to flow to it for a long time due to sanctions.
If we pretend that EU sanctions would be leaving the equation soon, then it makes sense. EU sanctions will likely still remain even if Ukraine gives up, though. The Russian-EU relationship is fractured for a long time and the gas flows will be restricted during that time period (it's the only card Russia has to play).
Posted on 10/4/22 at 2:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:quote:
The West gains massively here.
According to OP, they don't
The last paragraph in the OP say the West does gain from sabotaging the NS2. And we do.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 2:02 pm to Master Guilbeau
quote:
Lol show me someone hit a damn pipe sitting on the ocean floor with a torpedo.
It's not exactly a moving target.
Hell, we just hit an asteroid with a rocket a couple billions miles from Earth last week.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 2:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
Why are this boards Marxists upset at the idea of the U.S. destroying Russia’s pipeline?
They hate Russia and should be cheering Tater Joe on.
I did it get it.
They hate Russia and should be cheering Tater Joe on.
I did it get it.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News