- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mid Barataria Diversion
Posted on 11/29/24 at 12:09 pm to Mr Breeze
Posted on 11/29/24 at 12:09 pm to Mr Breeze
quote:
The more I think about it, the better "blow the levees south of Belle Chase" sounds as the most reasonable solution.
Because it's truly the most cost-effective solution over a 100-year period by miles.
Posted on 11/29/24 at 12:10 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:land is growing like crazy from Mardi Gras and Neptune passes.
There basically is no more East Plaquemines
Posted on 11/29/24 at 12:12 pm to cypresstiger
quote:
Mr. Breeze= 100% correct
Yikes… More like 50%
Posted on 11/29/24 at 12:12 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:Which is what the diversion aims to do. Reconnect the Barataria Bay estuary with land building sediment from the river and freshwater influence to restore more natural salinity level that’ll improve vegetation that holds the land together
It just makes more sense to move in a direction that's more natural,
Posted on 11/29/24 at 12:14 pm to Mr Breeze
quote:
Map below, the upper panel is around year 2,000 while the lower panel is an estimate of the State's coastline by the end of this century, absent mitigation.
quote:
Mitigation needs to occur but this depiction is hilarious fear mongering.
Posted on 11/29/24 at 12:31 pm to tigeraddict
quote:
But at least the fishing will be good….
Way too late reply but the fishing would be better with the diversion. That ecosystem, and all the fish that come with it, was built by the river. It builds the habitat for all of the bait that the fish we like to catch feeds on.
Even accounting for corruption, I cannot see any reason why this diversion shouldn't happen. Is it just that Landry and Nungesser are worried their camps won't have direct access to the water?
There's no way a handful of oystermen have this much influence over the entirety of Southeast Louisiana.
Posted on 11/29/24 at 12:39 pm to KPOC
I don’t know the science.
I DO know some of the people involved in the project.
Knowing those people makes me highly skeptical of the project.
I DO know some of the people involved in the project.
Knowing those people makes me highly skeptical of the project.
Posted on 11/29/24 at 1:28 pm to Stealth Matrix
This.
IMO, the corps and other agencies are just going to figure out navigable, deep water pass to maintain for commerce and then let the nature handle itself.
The associated costs would probably be a fraction of maintaining as is.
IMO, the corps and other agencies are just going to figure out navigable, deep water pass to maintain for commerce and then let the nature handle itself.
The associated costs would probably be a fraction of maintaining as is.
Posted on 11/29/24 at 4:19 pm to Marshhen
quote:
Dredging was not studied in the EIS
EIS excerpts from Section 2, Alternatives.
Dredging : Alternatives Table 2.3.1 see page 2-15.
" Moreover, this method would not mimic the natural deltaic processes through repeated inputs of sediment, fresh water, and nutrients during times of high river flow, but instead would involve the removal of riverbed or nearshore sediment material by a dredge for transport, as a slurry via pipeline, and disposal into a mechanically created cell to a target elevation. These activities could occur at times outside of high historical inputs (such as Spring Floods".
Section 2.3.5 Large Scale Marsh Creation - page 2-18
" Large-scale marsh creation projects in the Barataria Basin would involve dredging and movement of sediment from offshore or nearshore bodies of water, such as bayous, lakes, or canals, or from point bars in the Mississippi River, typically via hydraulic dredging and transporting dredged sediment via pipeline to specified locations within the basin for the purpose of replacing, creating, or maintaining eroded or subsided wetlands."
Dredging discussion as an Alternative ends on page 2-22.
USCOE EIS
You obviously disagree but it was considered and discarded in the EIS as not a viable, long term solution. I look forward to your revised definition of the word "studied."
Posted on 11/29/24 at 4:50 pm to The Boat
quote:
Mitigation needs to occur but this depiction is hilarious fear mongering.
Oops, that GIF is fast so here's the first and last images it's based upon.
Below is colorized land loss equivalent.
Our governor and his minions are going to kill the Barataria Bay Diversion. Trust them and not your lying eyes.
How anyone can be certain our coastal loss doesn't accelerate and propogate more rapidly in the next 75 years compared to the last 75 is, to me, highly suspect.
Enjoy your oysters.
Posted on 11/29/24 at 6:08 pm to Nola1962
quote:
fiversion
What’s a fiversion?
Posted on 11/29/24 at 6:28 pm to Mr Breeze
Yep you can’t fix stupidity. Let it burn
Popular
Back to top


1










