- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/25/25 at 9:51 am to stout
quote:
That's very close to Philanthrocapitalism. Look it up. It's not really a concept we should be basing society on.
People not working and sitting in their govt provided apartment is a recipe for disaster.
frick the tech bros
Posted on 8/25/25 at 9:51 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Nursing assistants but not nurses? Surgery assistants, but not surgeons?
I think this model is making a lot of licensing assumptions like surgeons are less replaceable because of the current day administrative process one must complete to become a surgeon. But if AI is really that powerful, we really wouldn’t need that.
We have the cart WAY in front of the horse here either way. AI can’t currently provide consistent results on the names of NFL stadiums, I’m not real worried about it taking er jerbs anytime soon
Posted on 8/25/25 at 9:53 am to wareaglepete
"AI is going to replace these jobs! So buy our AI product now so you're ahead of the curve..."
Posted on 8/25/25 at 9:53 am to stout
quote:
That's very close to Philanthrocapitalism. Look it up. It's not really a concept we should be basing society on.
I agree but it seems like it or some other form similar to it is coming whether we like it or not.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 9:53 am to stout
Supervisors of Firefighters? Seems odd to not just make it firefighters in general. As a cop, I'm safe. Even if there are things that AI could take over, we'll ever have the robotics to do what cops do.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 9:57 am to dstone12
I could replace all plant and system operators with instrumentation and automated valves, AI is just icing on the cake.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 9:58 am to Landmass
quote:
Dishwashers? Don't we have machines for that already?
Was thinking if AI can't wash the dishes from the point we already brought it, I do not think we have to worry about a terminator.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 9:58 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
2. The least to be affected by AI is mostly because you don’t need AI to do those, simple robotics will be sufficient
You keep saying that.
We use robotics all the time(shout out to gecko). What did that do? Made those who operate them obtain additional certifications which then allowed them to demand higher pay.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 9:59 am to Tantal
quote:
we'll ever have the robotics to do what cops do.
Let me introduce you to ED 209
Posted on 8/25/25 at 9:59 am to NoMercy
With all the crazies in this world we could use some AI orderlies.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:00 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
My profession isn’t on either list
So you are mid.
Good to know.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:41 am to justaniceguy
quote:
RIP to the 3k historians left
Just biding their time... the more AI history you read, the more you will be begging to read real history written by real people.
We already can't stand reading AI generated garbage on the internet. What makes you think that's going to get better? "10 Reasons Why the Reagan Administration was a Failure - You Won't Believe #8!"... Awesome shite, man.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:42 am to UtahCajun
quote:
We use robotics all the time(shout out to gecko). What did that do? Made those who operate them obtain additional certifications which then allowed them to demand higher pay.
Great, thanks for agreeing with me
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:43 am to UtahCajun
quote:
So you are mid.
You are a dumb, dumb person. Quite literally all it means is my profession is not the most or least likely to be affected by AI according to Microsoft. It has nothing to do if the progression itself is “mid”
Learn to read you fricking imbecile
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:44 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Great, thanks for agreeing with me
If by agree, you mean not one tech lost their job to a robot and the use of them only caused the pay of the tech to go up, then sure. We do agree.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:45 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
most or least likely to be affected by AI
So in the middle
Or
Mid
Edited to say: your narcassist levels are off the friggin chart if I got you with such a simple troll.
That explains a lot about you, but we already knew.
Get help brother. You need it.
This post was edited on 8/25/25 at 10:58 am
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:45 am to UtahCajun
quote:
If by agree, you mean not one tech lost their job to a robot and the use of them only caused the pay of the tech to go up, then sure.
What’s your revenue per person compared to what it was say 10-15 years ago?
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:47 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
What’s your revenue per person compared to what it was say 10-15 years ago
Deflection from your original point.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:50 am to el Gaucho
quote:
I don’t think ai will make a good historian because it looks at the facts instead of making up bullshite
Where does it get the facts?
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News