- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/1/19 at 8:40 am to SPEEDY
quote:No offense, but are you delusional -- or just being sarcastic ??
Because there certainly have been no increases in taxes in Baton Rouge the last 20 years
1/2 cent sales tax (for 30 years) was just voted in a few months ago.
This post was edited on 3/1/19 at 8:42 am
Posted on 3/1/19 at 8:42 am to Jester
quote:
It's been obvious all along. They are just starting to panic and finally admit their true intentions.
I looked for Mayor Broome on the local news last night, and I looked for an article in the morning paper about what she said; but there was nothing.
It seems like she may have talked out of school here, and they are trying to hush it up.
Better Together hooey.
Posted on 3/1/19 at 8:43 am to dawg23
I think your sarcasm detector is off. Either that or you need to turn it up a notch.
Posted on 3/1/19 at 9:58 am to Hangit
quote:
Hangit
I regret I have but one upvote to give
Posted on 3/1/19 at 10:36 am to dawg23
quote:quote:
Because there certainly have been no increases in taxes in Baton Rouge the last 20 years
No offense, but are you delusional -- or just being sarcastic ??
1/2 cent sales tax (for 30 years) was just voted in a few months ago.

Posted on 3/1/19 at 11:55 am to Deactived
Have any of the people opposing SG and playing race card ever pushed a true plan to annex SG residential areas into city of BR? I know they like business areas that don’t increase voters within the city.
I don’t get how anyone in city of BR can complain about neighborhoods not in the city wanting to form their own city. I would better understand argument if sections of actual city were trying to split off into its own city. Besides that not being the case with SG these BR leaders and community activists don’t seem to want the areas within SG to become part of the city even as they complain about SG money leaving. It’s not a section breaking away from BR, and it’s not a situation where they can argue the vote is between joining BR with them or forming SG without them.
I don’t get how anyone in city of BR can complain about neighborhoods not in the city wanting to form their own city. I would better understand argument if sections of actual city were trying to split off into its own city. Besides that not being the case with SG these BR leaders and community activists don’t seem to want the areas within SG to become part of the city even as they complain about SG money leaving. It’s not a section breaking away from BR, and it’s not a situation where they can argue the vote is between joining BR with them or forming SG without them.
This post was edited on 3/1/19 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 3/1/19 at 1:09 pm to dallastigers
quote:
Have any of the people opposing SG and playing race card ever pushed a true plan to annex SG residential areas into city of BR? I know they like business areas that don’t increase voters within the city.
I don’t get how anyone in city of BR can complain about neighborhoods not in the city wanting to form their own city. I would better understand argument if sections of actual city were trying to split off into its own city. Besides that not being the case with SG these BR leaders and community activists don’t seem to want the areas within SG to become part of the city even as they complain about SG money leaving. It’s not a section breaking away from BR, and it’s not a situation where they can argue the vote is between joining BR with them or forming SG without them.
It's all about the Benjamins. The opponents have been intellectually dishonest from the jump.
Popular
Back to top



0





