- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mandeville to consider banning smoking in bars
Posted on 6/25/17 at 3:58 pm to PrivatePublic
Posted on 6/25/17 at 3:58 pm to PrivatePublic
quote:
millenials don't go to smoking bars
Unless they are hookah bars
This post was edited on 6/25/17 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 6/25/17 at 3:58 pm to Honky Lips
That's ok. I smoke after your wife blows me in the parking lot
Posted on 6/25/17 at 4:01 pm to Honky Lips
I'm surprised smoking hasn't been banned indoors in all workplaces by OSHA.
Those frickers go apeshit over a can of spray paint. A bartender working 5 nights a week in a smoke filled bar has to be a hazardous environment.
Those frickers go apeshit over a can of spray paint. A bartender working 5 nights a week in a smoke filled bar has to be a hazardous environment.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 4:01 pm to TigernMS12
Yes, but it is more than speech. This point could be argued all night.
My expression is different than yours.
My expression is different than yours.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 4:02 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
Nope and nope. I make willing choices to go to places that don't allow smoking and my life is never effected by it in any way.
Your clothes smell like arse, and your sinuses say "frick you" to that "never effected" BS.
Lol
I guess your favorite place is a smoking bar you feel will shut down if non smoking?
Barflies are gonna barfly man.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 4:07 pm to Breesus
quote:
Individual communities passing their own laws independent of state and federal oversight is the epitome of a dual federalist small government republic
You think a small group of officials should be able to tell a business owner how to run his business?
Posted on 6/25/17 at 4:13 pm to LSU alum wannabe
You do realize that what you typed makes no sense as a reply to what he said, right?
Are you acting stupid or is it genuine?
Are you acting stupid or is it genuine?
Posted on 6/25/17 at 4:18 pm to mikrit54
quote:
This point could be argued all night.
I'm not sure how. If your talking about a constitutional right to the freedom of expression and whether or not one exists in particular circumstances there is only one way to have a legitimate discussion about it, and it's how our courts have interpreted it forever. That would be a sub-category of the freedom of speech. There is no where in our constitution that says you have a freedom of expression. It is implicit in the freedom to speak.
This post was edited on 6/25/17 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 6/25/17 at 4:42 pm to Honky Lips
quote:
quote:
You do not have to go to bars that allow smoking. Why can't you understand that?
So as a non smoker, I don't have the freedom to patronize any business I please? Got it.
God this is a dumb post
Posted on 6/25/17 at 4:59 pm to Dead End
quote:
Individual communities passing their own laws independent of state and federal oversight is the epitome of a dual federalist small government republic
You think a small group of officials should be able to tell a business owner how to run his business?
That small group of officials are elected by the community to govern and regulate the community. That's text book definition of a democratic republic. They didn't get elected by a majority of people by running on things that the community doesn't want. If you want to change it, vote them out.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 5:03 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
There are bars that don't allow smoking. Go to those.
This.
One of the casinos here is smoke-free and makes a yuuuuge point of that on billboards.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 5:11 pm to Honky Lips
quote:
So as a non smoker, I don't have the freedom to patronize any business I please? Got it.
You have the freedom to patronize any business you please. Just understand that some allow smoking.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 5:15 pm to bconne1
quote:
And smokers have the right to go outside and smoke. Why can't you understand that?
Yes smokers can go outside to smoke. And that's what they do in establishments that don't allow smoking. But if a bat allows it inside them the smoker has a right to smoke inside.
Again if you don't want to breath in second hand smoke don't go to bars that allow smoking inside.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 5:20 pm to Aubie Spr96
quote:
It's baffling. I do love it when "conservatives" use the power of gov't to force other people to do what they want them to do. Then, they'll bitch about other people doing the same thing to them regarding abortion, gun rights, drug legalization, etc, etc
As a conservative I agree. Less government in our personal lives is better. People need to realize they have to power to change this without the gooberment. If non smokers stop going to places that allow smoking the business owner would stop it on his own. Government does not get involved.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 5:31 pm to TigernMS12
quote:
That small group of officials are elected by the community to govern and regulate the community. That's text book definition of a democratic republic. They didn't get elected by a majority of people by running on things that the community doesn't want. If you want to change it, vote them out.
No worries. I'm voting against everyone currently in St Tammany government.
I can't understand why you think the government should regulate if a business owner allows smoking. Would you be ok if they voted to require smoking in every restaurant?
Posted on 6/25/17 at 5:34 pm to JOJO Hammer
quote:
As a conservative I agree. Less government in our personal lives is better. People need to realize they have to power to change this without the gooberment. If non smokers stop going to places that allow smoking the business owner would stop it on his own. Government does not get involved.
I completely agree. Let the free market decide. We don't need more government overreach.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 5:36 pm to LSU alum wannabe
quote:
Your clothes smell like arse, and your sinuses say "frick you" to that "never effected" BS.
How would these things happen if I don't go to smoking bars and don't smoke?
quote:
I guess your favorite place is a smoking bar you feel will shut down if non smoking?
Nope and nope. I don't smoke. I don't usually go to smoking bars (there aren't many in BR anyway). I've explained this plenty of time but you keep acting ignorant to it because it doesn't fit your argument
Posted on 6/25/17 at 5:39 pm to Honky Lips
quote:
Mandeville to consider banning smoking in bars
Normally I would be all in on opposing this type of statist big government bullshite but the entitled and whiny deflecting bitch attitude most smokers have today about this self destructive behavior they seek to protect just really makes me not give a frick about bans like this.
I would've given a shite about this in the past even as someone who hates smoking and nearly lost his father to it but I don't care now.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 5:42 pm to Sentrius
quote:
and whiny deflecting bitch attitude most smokers have today about this self destructive behavior they seek to protect just really makes me not give a frick about bans like this.
Sounds like you'd rather just ban smoking than ban it in bars.
The side trying to ban it is the side whining and bitching
And again I'll note that I don't smoke
Popular
Back to top


0




