- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/13/24 at 10:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There is also reporting after that she told Carver to have sex with her and when he didn't she called him the f word.
that was at the stop on jennifer jean when she was taunting carver
at some point it turned from something she wanted, to something she didnt want and everything changed from there
the whole thing is so sad
Posted on 1/13/24 at 11:23 am to supatigah
quote:
at some point it turned from something she wanted, to something she didnt want and everything changed from there
If you’ve ever been around a true blackout drunk, they say all kinds of things that don’t make sense, and have no memory of it afterward.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 1:37 pm to Rick9Plus
Something else to consider, while we are all playing armchair detective (or prosecutor or defense.) The medical examiner should be able to tell how fresh the anal trauma was. If there is no DNA from any other guys besides the defendants, the lack of it doesn’t prove they didn’t do it. If DNA “has to” be present from having “sex”, there would be *someone’s* present.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 1:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
n't she called him the f word
Frankfurter?
Posted on 1/13/24 at 2:09 pm to jbgleason
Wasn’t she making out with one of them in the bar?
Posted on 1/16/24 at 5:39 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Wasn’t she making out with one of them in the bar?
I dont recall reading that. Even if that is true, so what? Was she asking for it?
Posted on 1/22/24 at 12:25 pm to JDPndahizzy
Updated OP with new link.
Higher Court Decision
quote:
Higher court upholds ruling on Madison Brooks cellphone data
quote:
BATON ROUGE, La. (WAFB) - A higher court handed another blow to prosecutors as they pursue charges against several suspects tied to the alleged assault of LSU student Madison Brooks.
The First Circuit Court of Appeal denied a request from prosecutors who’d hoped to withhold some cellphone data from Brooks’ phone in the 72 hours prior to her alleged rape where four men were present.
A district court had previously ruled that defense attorneys should have access to that information, arguing that it could reveal important evidence including other sexual encounters that could have caused trauma found on Brooks’ body.
Attorney Joe Long represents Casen Carver, one of the men who was present for the encounter. Carver is charged with principal to third-degree rape which means he was present during the alleged crime, but no evidence exists that he participated.
quote:
Attorney Long successfully filed the initial opposition to the state withholding that cellphone data, along with another defense attorney who represents a different suspect in the case.
Prosecutors unsuccessfully argued that the court should’ve first inspected the data to determine how much, if any, of that information would be relevant to the case.
Higher Court Decision
This post was edited on 1/22/24 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 1/22/24 at 12:32 pm to JDPndahizzy
This decision was by the intermediate appellate court, not the Supreme Court. Your link is mislabeled.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 12:38 pm to boosiebadazz
Sorry.. Just edited. Thanks!
Posted on 1/22/24 at 12:45 pm to JDPndahizzy
Yeah frick this judge. Baton Rouge is such a cess pool and can’t get anything right. Need to death penalty these rapists and be done with the situation. Instead shite will continue to happen like this
Page 14 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News