Started By
Message

re: Louisiana fatal casualties of the Vietnam War

Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:00 am to
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57524 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Until some fairness came around in the draft process in 1970 it was also a war fought mostly by poor kids, if you want to make yourself wretch google the heroic draft evasion exploits of Dick Cheney, Rush Limbaugh and Ted Nugent.
what is wretching? Cheney got a deferment when he became a father, Limbaugh and Nugent were ultimately disqualified from service for medical reasons... yes i read the story about Ted taking meth before but it is believed to be untrue.

Also they all applied and received education deformations.
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
23776 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:02 am to
Yesterday, dad was talking about General Marion Carl. He was the Marines' first WWII fighter ace, a test pilot, and a real badass guy. I remember as a kid he would come to the house on occasion.

Some punk killed General Carl a few years ago in a home invasion. He was defending his wife from a the home invader. As you can imagine, dad was really pissed off about this.
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
47603 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:04 am to
quote:


I know, TL/DR, but my dad is 91 and having a bad time as my mother is in hospice (they have been married 65 years

frick no man. This is kinda shite we want to read and learn about that's not in movies and books.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
65058 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Certainly true as well. But you had far more up close and personal, hand-to-hand engagements out in the jungle and villages. I'm not dismissing the points about the differences in enemy - but our guys were different, too. There was a certain national "enthusiasm" about WWII - guys volunteering, whole families enlisting, etc.

In Vietnam, particularly as the war dragged on - a dread, a hesitance, and the guys who were drafted (and who actually showed up to be inducted, versus avoiding, dodging or actually fleeing the war) were in survival mode, rather than victory mode - that whole perspective shaped our entire war experience.


Well the notion that Vietnam was a war of mostly draftees while WWII was mostly volunteers is a bit of a myth as well.

Only 25% (648,500) of the total US force in Vietnam were draftees: in comparison, 66% of US troops in WWII were drafted. Further, the units most heavily engaged in actual fighting in Vietnam tended to be almost exclusively composed of volunteers (1st, 3rd Marine Div, Army Special Forces, 173rd Airborne Brigade, 101st Airborne Div, Army Rangers, Navy SEALS, etc.). Only later in the war, when the elite troops were withdrawn and replaced with significant numbers of draftees, did the percentage of conscripted causalities rise to the ultimate figure of approximately one-third of the total.

(Source Unheralded Victory: The Defeat of the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army 1961-1973. Ch 27 footnote 2)
This post was edited on 2/3/15 at 10:20 am
Posted by namvet6566
Member since Oct 2012
6865 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:21 am to
Too bad young people have not idea of Vietnam and its history. I was 18 when I went over a very emotional time 49 years later I still suffer from PTSD. In 2003 I had my thyroids removed due to Cancer from Agent orange.
The VA still refuses to give me disability. I hope my brothers and sisters keep the beer cold on the other side
Posted by 68wDoc68w
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2014
1869 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:25 am to
dude frick off

fricking prick


Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:28 am to
Was what he said untrue? The Vietnam War was a quagmire with no logical end that the government ultimately just washed its hands of. I'm sure the majority of men you'd talk to would say they were fighting for the man next to them, not for some more lofty, idealistic cause.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89781 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Well the notion that Vietnam was a war of mostly draftees while WWII was mostly volunteers is a bit of a myth as well.


That's true as well - particularly Hollywood's portrayal of that period, and further amplified by the anti-war movement at the time. Many of the well-known folks from that generation have famous stories about deferments and other shenanigans to avoid military service - such efforts are the subject of idle gossip today, but would have been considered treasonous during WWII.

And the national enthusiasm versus national reluctance isn't a myth - particularly as we got into 1968 and 1969.

This post was edited on 2/3/15 at 10:31 am
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
47603 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Too bad young people have not idea of Vietnam and its history. I was 18 when I went over a very emotional time 49 years later I still suffer from PTSD. In 2003 I had my thyroids removed due to Cancer from Agent orange.
The VA still refuses to give me disability. I hope my brothers and sisters keep the beer cold on the other side

Thanks for your service even if it's 40 years late! I'm no history buff but I really enjoyed the Netflix show and eager to learn about the entire conflict. Not ashamed to admit I didn't know the details on the end of the war and the scope political clusterfrick that hindered EVERYTHING we did there.

I also watched a protest documentary about those people protesting Dow and the war while disrupting classes at colleges around the country. They seemed like they should have been going to class and not being whining hippies so much. My $.02 on that one.
This post was edited on 2/3/15 at 10:33 am
Posted by SnoopALoop
Nashville
Member since Apr 2014
4407 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:33 am to
Quite a few from my hometown.
Posted by 68wDoc68w
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2014
1869 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Was what he said untrue? The Vietnam War was a quagmire with no logical end that the government ultimately just washed its hands of. I'm sure the majority of men you'd talk to would say they were fighting for the man next to them, not for some more lofty, idealistic cause


yea exactly those men GAVE there lives for the man next to them. And I don't see how you can speak for all those who died. as already stated most of those men were not drafted so they joined for some greater purpose than themselves. you had exponentially more people drafted during WWII. I served my country and would have given my life for the man next to me and for the preservation of this country.

I don't understand how people who have NEVER been through the fire of combat speak to what a service member thinks, feels, goes through.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89781 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:44 am to
quote:

To give a good example of what WWII was like compared to Vietnam, I'll cite the mostly forgotten Battle of Hurtgen Forest that was fought from September through December 1944. In this one battle fought over a few month period the US suffered over 30,000 casualties and many of the infantry battalions that were engaged suffered losses over 70-80%. And this battle only wrapped up due to the German's launching their winter offensive that history knows as The Battle of the Bulge where the US suffered another roughly 100,000 casualties in a little over a month.

Now add in on top of that the fact the US was also at that same time having men fighting and dying every day in Italy and then there's the whole Pacific theater going on as well and you get a picture of just how huge of a meat grinder WWII actually was.


I missed this post the first time, Darth - 3rd AD was in Hurtgen as well. BTW - for those who haven't seen it - great film set during this battle - When Trumpets Fade - a made for TV film in fact, starring Ron Eldard (recall he played Michael Durant in Blackhawk Down) as a soldier in the 28th ID.


The fact that WWII was warfare beyond the industrial scale of the Napoleonic Wars, American Civil War, Franco-Prussian and WWI, even, in a way lessens the emotional impact. We "only" lost about half a million. France, Germany, Russia and Japan lost multiples of millions. Although it shouldn't, it ultimately lessens the impact of the individual loss on the society as a whole.

What else changed during Vietnam? The media coverage. That's when the U.S. was somehow persuaded that the costs of war were just too high - and that casualties are the only way to "keep score" in a war, rather than securing victory and dictating terms.

And the incessant reporting of the bodycount along with the near realtime news delivery of combat footage helped shape modern American society.

There were 5 things that happened, more or less simultaneously - # television sets in the U.S. reached a critical mass, JFK (the first multimedia President), the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, the space race and the Vietnam War (all with the backdrop of the Cold War with the Soviet Union) - those 5 events, somewhat intertwined, continue to shape how national events, global crises and wars are reported to the American public to this day.
This post was edited on 2/3/15 at 10:48 am
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
65058 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 10:58 am to
quote:

I missed this post the first time, Darth - 3rd AD was in Hurtgen as well. BTW - for those who haven't seen it - great film set during this battle - When Trumpets Fade - a made for TV film in fact, starring Ron Eldard (recall he played Michael Durant in Blackhawk Down) as a soldier in the 28th ID.



The 28th was a national guard division from Pennsylvania nicknamed the "Bloody Bucket Div", they lived up to that name in the Hurtgen for sure. Which that's another aspect of WWII that was different from Vietnam, there was almost no National Guard formations in Vietnam while in WWII, there were whole divisions made up of National Guard. And not only were there NG divisions in the fighting, they were in some of the most brutal fighting of the war, especially in the ETO. For example the 29th Infantry Div landed as the first wave on Omaha beach at Normandy and it's 116th Inf Regiment suffered some of the heaviest casualty rates of any unit during Overlord.

As for the rest of your post, you're right that how the war was covered played a HUGE role in the war. The sad fact is the American public were for all intents and purposes lied to by the media and given a falsely pessimistic view of the war. The truth on the ground was that the US forces were inflicting on the NVA and Viet Cong one of the most lopsided defeats in the history of warfare but the US public were led to believe that the war was "unwinnable". It's a travesty bordering on traitorous behavior what many in the media did during Vietnam.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89781 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 11:07 am to
quote:

The 28th was a national guard division from Pennsylvania nicknamed the "Bloody Bucket Div",


Yeah - I know, Darth - I was under them in Kosovo. They're the "Keystone Division" and their lineage goes back to Benjamin Franklin.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89781 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 11:09 am to
quote:

It's a travesty bordering on traitorous behavior what many in the media did during Vietnam.


I don't let people speak well of Walter Kronkite without offering some rebuttal on this point.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36483 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 11:12 am to
quote:

Was what he said untrue? The Vietnam War was a quagmire with no logical end that the government ultimately just washed its hands of. I'm sure the majority of men you'd talk to would say they were fighting for the man next to them, not for some more lofty, idealistic cause.


I can't disagree. It was a terrible loss of life for a futile, political cause. I have the utmost respect for the men (and in a lot of cases boys) who were sent over there to die by politicians. Then, those who came back were often ignored and left to rot by the government, whether they suffered from PTSD or Agent Orange effects. It was a truly sorry chapter in our modern history, and that has everything to do with the government and Washington and has no bearing on the heroic service of our veterans. I don't see what is controversial about that statement. I guess the first guy could have used a little more tact in his message.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
65058 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 11:12 am to
quote:

I don't let people speak well of Walter Kronkite without offering some rebuttal on this point.


He was one of the worst.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
65058 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Yeah - I know, Darth - I was under them in Kosovo. They're the "Keystone Division" and their lineage goes back to Benjamin Franklin.


I figured you did. I only posted that as a footnote on one of the big differences in the two wars. I know there's a lot of folks nowadays that see NG soldiers as "weekend warriors" and only wanted to give some balance to that misconception.
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 11:20 am to
It's an intriguing war to read about from the perspective of the individual soldier, especially those in covert and special forces. I just finished reading two of John Plaster's books about the SOG recon guys. Stories that are beyond incredible. These dudes were lethally adept jungle warriors.




In the same vein, I also recommend the three books by Jim Donahue about his time in the Mobile Guerrilla Force.


Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89781 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 11:23 am to
quote:

I know there's a lot of folks nowadays that see NG soldiers as "weekend warriors" and only wanted to give some balance to that misconception.


And that clearly happened during the Vietnam era - LBJ's conscious decision NOT to mobilize the country for Vietnam - to have both "guns" and "butter" - run the war as a sideshow, while amping up his "War on Poverty" and other domestic priorities. Part of that was not mobilizing the National Guard, which would have given the war more of a collective effort feel to it. While it is true that many volunteered, as the war dragged on, guys getting the draft notices started to feel like losers - even more so when the war was being sold by our own media as a lost cause.

You'll notice they've tried to do that ever since, ultimately succeeding in Somalia and, to a lesser degree, Iraq. They've almost succeeded in Afghanistan.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram