- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana DOTD Megaprojects
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:01 am to Goalman34
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:01 am to Goalman34
quote:
I 10 bridge in Lake Charles will happen soon.........cause the current bridge will fall any day now
210 bridge upgrades are happening next year. Once those are complete I-10 bridge will be torn down and replaced.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:24 am to LSUneaux
quote:
Monroe
New Bridge
Ouachita River in Monroe
New bridge & connections
Will never happen. This bridge has been discussed for over 30 years. Monroe and WM will never come together to decide where to put it.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:30 am to Chitter Chatter
So this administration isn't going to do anything to alleviate bridge traffic. WTF. A new bridge should be priority A. It's fricking bullshite that it's not the first project to be addressed. Traffic in this city is abysmal. What complete and total lack of leadership from the governor on this.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:32 am to Ben Hur
quote:
New Orleans/ I-10/ Williams Blvd. (LA 49) to Veterans Blvd. / Widen to 8-lanes
Perfect. It will take another 5 years for design/approval and at least 10 for construction, before they have to do it over again because someone messed up.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:33 am to Tiger Prawn
quote:
Interesting....had no idea that there was ever any plans for extending I-510 freeway through Chalmette and building a bridge to connect to WB Expressway.
Would have been I-410.
![](https://www.roadfan.com/design/410-2b.jpg)
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:35 am to LSUneaux
6 lanes from Ruston to Monroe? The frick?
This post was edited on 3/7/17 at 8:36 am
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:38 am to Badman
I mean I don't think it's really needed. Between interstate Louisville and downtown bridges I don't see why they would need this.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:41 am to tigerinthebueche
quote:
his is all part of the sales pitch to get you to approve a huge increase in the gas tax. DOTD rolls out an " aggressive" list of projects for which they need funding. But none of this is going to happen.
I wouldn't say "nothing" will happen. Matter of fact, a 50+ million dollar I-10 interchange is already planned where Pecue passes over I-10. That's right, that 2 mile stretch of I10 between siegan and highland is getting an on-ramp/off-ramp. Now, let's forget about the absolute dire need for any improvements at LA-1 or Miss River bridge. The geniuses at LADOTD are going to instead waste $50+ million on an off ramp between 2 existing off ramps that lie within a mile of each other, and completely ignore the need for off ramps/interchanges past highland that feed directly into Prairieville. That's where all the traffic backs up. It backs up I10 East at highland road because people are trying to get to P'Ville. All this will do will cause the traffic to now stack up on Pecue, and Highland, and make Airline from Pecue to P'ville and even greater parking lot at 5 pm.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:44 am to Pedro
With the growth of Sterlington, there needs to be a bridge north of Monroe. Imagine how that would free up the cluster on Hwy165 if everyone going to WM didn't have to go all the way down to i20.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:50 am to BugAC
Projects like this one and the Tram are driven by the developers who need the state to make improvements so they can make money.
Yes Pecue comes before improving I-10 through BR because it makes the right people money. Other projects fall behind because of this type of thinking.
Yes Pecue comes before improving I-10 through BR because it makes the right people money. Other projects fall behind because of this type of thinking.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:52 am to Badman
That makes sense. That does throw up a good question as to where they would put that though
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:55 am to doubleb
quote:
Yes Pecue comes before improving I-10 through BR because it makes the right people money. Other projects fall behind because of this type of thinking.
What do you mean "makes the right people money"?
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:59 am to Jim Smith
quote:
What do you mean "makes the right people money"?
The people with influence.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:02 am to Pedro
Would love to see it connect somehow to the north end of the Kansas lane extension project. I actually think that will be the next phase of that project. What's going to make that hard is from 165 to the river is all small lakes and marsh land.
Of course we will all be dead and gone before that happens.
Of course we will all be dead and gone before that happens.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:12 am to tigerinthebueche
quote:
They won't happen. This is all part of the sales pitch to get you to approve a huge increase in the gas tax. DOTD rolls out an " aggressive" list of projects for which they need funding. But none of this is going to happen. The state will take the money for healthcare (Medicare) expenses or something else. They've been doing this for decades. Why do you think there is billions in backlog work now? We've been paying taxes for this. The state just doesn't do anything.
The backlog happened because the money needed for road improvement was diverted to go elsewhere. You can thank Jindal for a good bit of that. Don't even get me started on the lack of money for road maintenance.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:20 am to The Boat
quote:
The original plan decades ago was for 310 and 510 to connect with the westbank expressway (910) to form a southern loop
And of course Louisiana politics probably derailed it...
So much traffic would be alleviated by the CCC and downtown had a southern loop like that ever been built. And St Charles Parish would have exploded in growth.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:27 am to Badman
me and a buddy on campus were just talking about this. maybe through the chauvin swamp tract or something?
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:29 am to mikelbr
But how/why was it cancelled?
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:30 am to Pedro
You know that the Kansas lane ext was supposed to connect to h165 at the Forsythe ext?
Now they are planning on having it come out somewhere around Centurylink. Not sure how they will accomplish that.
Now they are planning on having it come out somewhere around Centurylink. Not sure how they will accomplish that.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)