- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:16 pm to PoppedRiser
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:16 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
You see, there's a comma there. Cause, "please, bitch" is different than "please bitch".
Lol. You did it again! This is amazing.
1
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:20 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Russia fell back on two fronts before Western aid could be integrated into Ukraine's military
BS.. NATO was preparing Ukraine for this War since 2014. Like I said, if Russia wins....it will be the biggest upset in Military History. I definitely know ICU Nurses and CRNA's with more intelligence than you. I still can't believe as a doctor you were latching on to that "Paid by Putin" nonsense
Please tell me you were trolling and not being serious Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. "Ukraine Was not in NATO, but NATO Was in Ukraine Since 2014
Wait what?! This idiot just admitted to the truth, NATO has been crafting the war for almost a decade!
Jens Stoltenberg, the Secretary General of NATO, says NATO has been providing "training and equipment" to Ukraine's military since "the war started in 2014."
Most people don’t know NATO has been arming Ukraine since 2014! Now they will…"
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:20 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Lol. You did it again! This is amazing.
Do what, retard? I gave you an explanation as to why it is acceptable. My source is me. You can't punctuate to save your life while defending another idiot who doesn't know the difference between two very different words.
quote:
There is no evidence of this. The death totals using Russian and Ukrainian obituary data are remarkably similar.
If you take Zelensky's hairy little cock and balls out your mouth, you might be able to see. 15:1 body exchange ratios, constant loss of land by Ukraine, constant mobilizations and kidnappings, preventing people from leaving the border in Ukraine, indicates they're struggling immensely on manpower. They can't even afford 1:1 loss ratio to Russia because Russia has 7 time more men. Given Russia has advantage in every weapon group and even counting inefficiencies, they're still outkilling Ukrainians.
But if you cope a little harder, I'm sure their issues will resolve themselves.
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:23 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
Do what, retard? I gave you an explanation as to why it is acceptable. My source is me.
It is not acceptable and would be marked as incorrect in any English 101 class. Sorry, but you are wrong.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:26 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
It is not acceptable and would be marked as incorrect in any English 101 class. Sorry, but you are wrong.
Like you ever passed English 101. GTFO
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:26 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
In addition, the data collected by Oryx suggests something else, as Oryx attempts to verify each battlefield vehicle loss
Incorrect. Oryx has already been debunked as BS. Paid by USAID money. Counting Ukraine tank losses as Russian. You are right up there with the top NAFO troll liars.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:27 pm to John Barron
quote:
BS.. NATO was preparing Ukraine for this War since 2014
The amount of pledged equipment before Feb. 2022 is barely significant to the amount pledged and received after Feb. 2022.
quote:
I definitely know ICU Nurses and CRNA's with more intelligence than you. I still can't believe as a doctor you were latching on to that "Paid by Putin" nonsense
I was satisfied that you weren't a troll when you mentioned the Saints, but that makes your posting style even more pathetic. I was being gracious in that assumption.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:34 pm to John Barron
Choosing 10 entries a little low, considering the amount of losses that Oryx has tabled. Otherwise, that guy you linked is doing some good analysis. I disbelieve any officially published figures, and unfortunately there isn't an obituary-trawling equivalent for equipment.
I would argue that the loss data for both sides suggest that it is the case of two armies coming to terms with a new way of warfare in real-time. I do not believe any lopsided numbers regardless.
I would argue that the loss data for both sides suggest that it is the case of two armies coming to terms with a new way of warfare in real-time. I do not believe any lopsided numbers regardless.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:35 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
Like you ever passed English 101. GTFO
You definitely didn't, especially if you are insisting on something as ridiculous as not placing punctuation inside the quotation marks. You should reference The Elements of Style and try to do a little better.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:41 pm to dagrippa
quote:
How many Russian's have died attacking Ukraine, John?
24
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:43 pm to crazy4lsu
Your First Statement...
Is incorrect. NATO was integrating equipment and planning since 2014. This was admitted by NATO. Did they increase equipment since 2022? Yes.... Does that mean there was no significant equipment and planning since 2014? Absolutely fricking Not. That would be like denying your patient is probably having a heart attack who presents with chest pain and a severely elevated troponin level...doctor
quote:
before Western aid could be integrated into Ukraine's military
Is incorrect. NATO was integrating equipment and planning since 2014. This was admitted by NATO. Did they increase equipment since 2022? Yes.... Does that mean there was no significant equipment and planning since 2014? Absolutely fricking Not. That would be like denying your patient is probably having a heart attack who presents with chest pain and a severely elevated troponin level...doctor
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:51 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
I disbelieve any officially published figures, and unfortunately there isn't an obituary-trawling equivalent for equipment.
I would argue that the loss data for both sides suggest that it is the case of two armies coming to terms with a new way of warfare in real-time. I do not believe any lopsided numbers regardless
Kudos to you. This is a sound logical assessment that I would expect from most doctors that I have been working with for years. I saw many other post on Twitter of Oryx double counting equipment or counting Ukrainian equipment as Russian. The fact that they are presented by the Pro Ukrainian community as some gold standard is comical
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:53 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
I am guessing they aren't teaching you the intricacies of American slang.
They also haven't taught him iconic Saturday Night Live characters.
Gary will eventually figure it out...
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:53 pm to John Barron
quote:
NATO was integrating equipment and planning since 2014.
If they were planning since then, then they did it pretty poorly.
quote:
Did they increase equipment since 2022? Yes.... Does that mean there was no significant equipment and planning since 2014
The new equipment that was pledged to Ukraine after Feb. 2022 was not fully integrated into Ukraine's military by the time Russia's northern front collapsed nor by the time their southern front collapsed. I could be wrong, but most of the heavier equipment, such as Leopard MBT's, was not promised until late 2022 or 2023, which would make it impossible to be integrated into Ukraine's military by then. The HIMARS system was delivered by 2022, and thus was integrated to a degree (and with stipulations, from what I recall).
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:57 pm to SirWinston
quote:
All I ask is that you acknowledge Russia is, was, and will always be a paper tiger incapable of advancing beyond Ukraine.
Yes, this is true.
The problem is that Putin and his cadre did not realize it. And now that they've had to realize it, they do not accept it.
They can't take Ukraine, so will they be able to take Moldova?
Moldova is tiny and weak... so probably, if they find a way to get to it... Thankfully, Moldova has finally stopped letting Russian "visitors" fly in and go to Transnistria, probably because the Kremlin publically announced it was sending 10,000 troops to Transnistria (and the troops have been rotating there by flying into Moldova from other countries as tourists with Russian passports)...
beyond that, the Baltics?
Most probably not.
But does that mean they won't try.
Should they have tried to invade Ukraine?
Why did they do it, anyway?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:59 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
his emo is catching typos.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:06 pm to SirWinston
quote:
What would be different is if Ukraine holds this land and the Globalist fricks fill it with Africans and Moslems (which they will definitely do).
always pathetic racism with you
Are you saying if Russia controlled Ukraine, none of the Russians who are Muslim would go to Ukraine?
Hell, they've sent a lot of them there at this point, but most have died on the battlefield.
Russia has sent tons of African troops, too.
Your fantasy of Russia as some pure white European paradise is hardly based in reality.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:13 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
But little Z is using Ukro population as a lifestock to keep the front from collapsing.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:17 pm to John Barron
quote:
LSURussian and Narax who are the same poster
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:29 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
The overwhelming advantage Russia has in manpower and materiel from the beginning of the war also suggests that they also have an overwhelming advantage in incompetence. Each time those morons bring up the resources argument, they are tacitly admitting that Ukraine is fighting the right type of war given their limitations.
The material advantage was false... Soviet corruption in the military was infamous, but post-Soviet corruption multiplied that by 1000. The troops that invaded Ukraine were under-supplied, under-fueled, and not even told honestly what they were doing because this was the initial training for most of them.
The expectation was that Zelensky and his cabinet would look at the numbers of people pouring into the country and jump on a jet out of the country.
That's how it usually works, right?
When that didn't happen...
If we go back, and most people seem to have forgotten this in the following short 3 years, farmers were shooting at the Russians, little old ladies were throwing Molotov Cocktails at tanks... and young Russian troops were shitting their pants because they had no idea why.
That mile-long caravan to Kyiv, that was really supposed to scare Zelensky into running away, became sitting ducks for very well-organized Ukrainian Special Forces, who were waiting... and ordinary young Ukrainian females plied intel on all of it out of young idiot troops on social media and dating apps and passed it along to the government.
This was all back when the US and Europe had thrown up their hands and considered Ukraine as good as conquered... and when it didn't happen, we started sending them arms.
If we'd armed them when we suspected it was about to happen, they would've wiped the Russians out even more than they did. It might've been the end of it right there.
Page 4998 of 5046
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News