- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 6/9/25 at 4:36 pm to PoppedRiser
Posted on 6/9/25 at 4:36 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
If you take your head your arse, there is. They've closed the border and getting randos off the street and stuffing them in vans. Those groups that are engaged in that have now faced pushback with several of them being killed, beaten, their cars and vans being set on fire and protests. But little Z is using Ukro population as a lifestock to keep the front from collapsing.
And if that’s all true, why isn’t Russia rolling back Ukrainian forces?
The answer is it’s exaggerated.
2
Posted on 6/9/25 at 4:40 pm to doubleb
quote:
And if that’s all true, why isn’t Russia rolling back Ukrainian forces?
The overwhelming advantage Russia has in manpower and materiel from the beginning of the war also suggests that they also have an overwhelming advantage in incompetence. Each time those morons bring up the resources argument, they are tacitly admitting that Ukraine is fighting the right type of war given their limitations.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 4:44 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
This is the third time you've made this mistake. The irony here is that you are correcting someone else on their grammar and attempting to use that to convince random people that the poster in question is not an American.
What are you even bitching about? My use of a period after a quotation, yes, so it doesn't look smudged together. I'm not writing a fricking essay, kid. ." doesn't look as good as ". This is punctuation you're bringing up, he's fricking up actual words, which distort the contextual meaning of his drivel.
You admitted you worked in Ukraine and Russia, which probably implies you're from there. So do everyone a favor and STFU with any insinuation here. You have nothing to back up you're from here.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 4:47 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
The irony here is that you are correcting someone else on their grammar and attempting to use that to convince random people that the poster in question is not an American.
Incorrect. LSURussian and Narax who are the same poster both consistently call out grammar mistakes and use it to claim others are Russian Bots. So Popped Riser pointing out Narax's mistake is just giving him a taste of their own Medicine. The Irony is the user LSURUSSIAN/Narax constantly using that tactic but then doing it himself.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 4:51 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
What are you even bitching about? My use of a period after a quotation, yes, so it doesn't look smudged together. I'm not writing a fricking essay, kid. ." doesn't look as good as ". This is punctuation you're bringing up, he's fricking up actual words, which distort the contextual meaning of his drivel.
It is a standard convention of American English. It is literally one of the features that separates it stylistically from British English. I don't care how good you think it looks, it is not correct.
quote:
You admitted you worked in Ukraine and Russia, which probably implies you're from there
What? I have never said anything close to that.
quote:
So do everyone a favor and STFU with any insinuation here. You have nothing to back up you're from here.
First, I will do as I please. Second, you are the one fond of suggesting people who disagree with you are Ukrainian. That is a weird obsession, and makes me suspect you aren't American. Third, the admission that you don't follow any sports (other than rooting for Russia in every post you make) makes me even more suspect. Even John Barron, who is a silly 'murse,' admitted to following the Saints at one point in time.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 4:52 pm to doubleb
quote:
And if that’s all true, why isn’t Russia rolling back Ukrainian forces?
The answer is it’s exaggerated.
You know the exact answer and it's the same one I just gave you, you're just playing dumb.
They're using fodder strategy to slow Russia. Even a sick man with a non-working rifle will have to be dealt with if you put him in a trench. Russians are having to kill a lot of Ukrainian infantry, much of which is buried in those trenches and treelines. Secondarily, having 24-hour drone surveillance and FPV drones rigged with a charge allows you to extend your limited manpower to cover a wider area, not to mention NATO surveillance intel Ukros receive.
This is not like any other war that was fought in the past due to the drone element. Even US media is mentioning that the age of heavy armored warfare may have come to an end since a 10 million Abrahms tank can be taken out by 1-2 FVP drones with a shaped charge strapped to it. $300 bucks to kill a 10 million dollar tank. Russia isn't immune to this either and their improvised contraptions for stopping drones keep progressing too.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 4:52 pm to John Barron
quote:
Incorrect. LSURussian and Narax who are the same poster both consistently call out grammar mistakes and use it to claim others are Russian Bots. So Popped Riser pointing out Narax's mistake is just giving him a taste of their own Medicine. The Irony is the user LSURUSSIAN/Narax constantly using that tactic but then doing it himself
Please bitch. Popped tried the same with me before those other posters entered the thread. The irony is his alone.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 4:56 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
they are tacitly admitting that Ukraine is fighting the right type of war given their limitations.
Incorrect. You keep repeating this lie. Ukraine was backed by 300 billion worth of Equipment,Intelligence,Planning Training, Weapon Systems, and NATO Fire Control. Not to mention Multi Thousands of International Mercenaries Ukraine was able to hire with the billions given to them. They have no limitations except for Manpower at this point which is why they are losing the War. If Ukraine loses this War with all the NATO backing and help they had it will be the biggest upset in History
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 6/9/25 at 4:57 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
And if that’s all true, why isn’t Russia rolling back Ukrainian forces? The answer is it’s exaggerated.
This is the literal emo of every Ukrosimp in this thread. How many times have you accused JB of being a Russian troll?
Your hypocrisy and simultaneous bitching is too much.
Any American is perfectly justified in suspecting Ukro/NAFO troll farms which are still operational from the residual USAID bucks that were give to operate troll farms. They're widespread on X, reddit, comment sections etc...
That being said, I agree with John that nobody here is paid. Just blowhards who have an emotional stake in this for some reason.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 4:59 pm to John Barron
Russia fell back on two fronts before Western aid could be integrated into Ukraine's military.
You are the one mentioning the 10:1 artillery advantage, manpower and resources advantage. Does Russia have air superiority? Have they ever had it? Does Russia control the Black Sea?
What if Russia is as incompetent as their battlefield performance suggests?
You are the one mentioning the 10:1 artillery advantage, manpower and resources advantage. Does Russia have air superiority? Have they ever had it? Does Russia control the Black Sea?
What if Russia is as incompetent as their battlefield performance suggests?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:00 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Please bitch. Popped tried the same with me before those other posters entered the thread. The irony is his alone.
Are you telling him to please a bitch? You're not even properly punctuating which fricks up the context of the sentence. This is why you get called you, you illiterate nit.
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:01 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
This is the literal emo of every Ukrosimp in this thread.
Did you mean to say MO, as in modus operandi? Emo is a very funny mistake not typical of an American.
quote:
Any American is perfectly justified in suspecting Ukro/NAFO troll farms which are still operational from the residual USAID bucks that were give to operate troll farms.
You aren't American. That much is obvious.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:03 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
The irony is his alone.
Incorrect Bitch. LSURussian/Narax have been using that same tactic since I started posting here in September. And they consistently make big deals about grammar. It is highly Ironic that he didn't know the difference between moral and morale
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:03 pm to John Barron
quote:
Incorrect. LSURussian and Narax who are the same poster both consistently call out grammar mistakes and use it to claim others are Russian Bots. So Popped Riser pointing out Narax's mistake is just giving him a taste of their own Medicine. The Irony is the user LSURUSSIAN/Narax constantly using that tactic but then doing it himself.
Ukrosimps really give Ronbots a run for their money in hypocrisy and gaslighting. There's definitely a crossover.
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 5:05 pm
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:05 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
Are you telling him to please a bitch?
I am guessing they aren't teaching you the intricacies of American slang. The term is a play on the American slang phrase 'Bitch, please,' which originated in the 1970's in America.
quote:
You're not even properly punctuating which fricks up the context of the sentence
Lol.
quote:
This is why you get called you, you illiterate nit.
Did you have a stroke while typing this out?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:06 pm to John Barron
quote:
It is highly Ironic that he didn't know the difference between moral and morale
There is no need to capitalize ironic in that sentence, nurse.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:07 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
Secondarily, having 24-hour drone surveillance and FPV drones rigged with a charge allows you to extend your limited manpower to cover a wider area, not to mention NATO surveillance intel Ukros receive.
You definitely have more knowledge and intelligence than these NAFO trolls.
They consistently ignore all the obvious facts about this WarPosted on 6/9/25 at 5:08 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
I am guessing they aren't teaching you the intricacies of American slang. The term is a play on the American slang phrase 'Bitch, please,' which originated in the 1970's in America.
Except you said "Please bitch."
You see, there's a comma there. Cause, "please, bitch" is different than "please bitch".
PS. you can absolutely put a period outside of a quotation mark in if it's followed by a source. It is probably my leftover habit from school days.
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:11 pm to cypher
Zaporizhia was terrorized today with GABs. The embedded video in the link below shows the residential neighborhood and interviews with the locals. If you watch the video, select the "Watch on Youtube" option and enable closed captioning and you should see the captioning in english.
Today, June 9, the Russian army attacked Zaporizhzhia with guided aerial bombs (GABs). Two people were injured as a result of the shelling. At least seven private houses were destroyed, and a gas supply pipe was also damaged.
Suspilny correspondents found out how people are recovering from the Russian shelling.
Suspilne
Today, June 9, the Russian army attacked Zaporizhzhia with guided aerial bombs (GABs). Two people were injured as a result of the shelling. At least seven private houses were destroyed, and a gas supply pipe was also damaged.
Suspilny correspondents found out how people are recovering from the Russian shelling.
Suspilne
Posted on 6/9/25 at 5:16 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
They're using fodder strategy to slow Russia
There is no evidence of this. The death totals using Russian and Ukrainian obituary data are remarkably similar. Mediazona does it in Russia and the site ualosses.org does it for the Ukrainians. In addition, the data collected by Oryx suggests something else, as Oryx attempts to verify each battlefield vehicle loss with video or some other type of visually confirmed evidence. Those numbers do not suggest that the Russians have established one-sided battlefield dominance.
quote:
Secondarily, having 24-hour drone surveillance and FPV drones rigged with a charge allows you to extend your limited manpower to cover a wider area, not to mention NATO surveillance intel Ukros receive.
So the Russians have not found a way to leverage their significant battlefield advantages, and instead have seen two of their initial attack vectors collapse. In addition, it is a difficult proposition for Russia to establish a bridgehead along the Dnipro River, which makes capturing Kherson and Odessa a difficult endeavor. It would be a difficult operation for any army and I don't have the belief that the Russians can pull it off. They might reach their objectives if other sectors of the battlespace go in their favor, but the Dnipro is a natural boundary and one that is vexing to deal with if the intent is to get to the other bank.
Page 4997 of 5046
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News