Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 8/2/24 at 8:59 am to
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
13309 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Insofar as war is the failure of diplomacy


Very few wars are actually the failure of diplomacy.

With two sides negotiating in good faith, wars don't happen.

Hitler made up his mind about when and where he was going to launch his wars and invasions. Same with George W Bush. Sadaam Hussein.

Same with North Korea in 1950. Same with Vietnam. The US in Panama and Grenada.

Amd of course the same with Putin. He wasn't engaged in failed diplomacy. He was engaged in rebuilding the USSR.

Even the US Civil War broke out because neither side engaged in any sort of diplomacy at all. So you can't say the efforts failed. They were never engaged.

In fact, I can't think of many wars that resulted from failed diplomacy in good faith. Maybe WWI ? Maybe the American Revolutionary War ? Probably the War of 1812.

Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42603 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 9:13 am to
If you want to give Putin a pass and shift blame to the US and the West, you say diplomacy failed, NATO pressured him into attacking, or blame the MIC.

This post was edited on 8/2/24 at 10:18 am
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8364 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 9:49 am to
=
quote:

Maybe WWI ? Maybe the American Revolutionary War


Sometimes there are so many conditions/ingredients mixing together that the addition or removal of a couple wouldn't really change a lot. I think that's true with both of these conflicts.

With WWI if it wasn't Franz Ferdinand something else would have kicked it off. It was building either way. The assassination itself was actually a relatively minor thing if the other conditions of the time didn't exist.

The Revolution is a doozy because Britain was vastly overstepping, but also had valid reasons for raising some of the taxes they raised. With the founders I think you had a mix of people who legitimately wanted to create a free society of the people, and some who just saw it as a chance to grab power for themselves. A revolution of some kind likely happens even if you don't have some of the taxes that were applied, the Boston Massacre, quartering, etc. It probably would have just been much smaller and potentially unsuccessful.

I'm not saying that I think there are wars that are completely unavoidable necessarily, but there are some that you would have to go back decades if not centuries to change events in order to stop them.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138772 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Very few wars are actually the failure of diplomacy.

With two sides negotiating in good faith, wars don't happen.
You'd be hard pressed to define "good faith" in that context.
E.g., If one's 'ask' is greater than than his need, is he negotiating in "good faith"? If one is deceitful or misleading about needs or tolerances during negotiations, is that party negotiating in "good faith"?
quote:

Hitler made up his mind about when and where he was going to launch his wars and invasions.
You don't know why the Polish invasion occurred. You should. At least you should know prior to posting as if you do. There obviously is a chasm between degrees of responsibility there, but sans the stupidity of Versailles, Hitler would have been but a bavarian store clerk with a bad mustache.
quote:

Even the US Civil War broke out because neither side engaged in any sort of diplomacy at all. So you can't say the efforts failed. They were never engaged.
The Union was formed, and Civil War was staved off for a half century, as result of diplomacy, negotiation, and compromise. The "no diplomacy" you describe, actually represents its terminal failure.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:30 am to
quote:

E.g. ...


Again, you can't seem to fathom what I mean. I told you explicitly that you treat any and all Russian factions, of which there are many, as negotiating in good faith. We have again lots of documentary evidence that the nationalist wing of the Russian elite had revanchist claims even before NATO expanded. Again, in terms of the historical record, the preponderance of evidence shows that there was a large swath of the Western security decision-makers who were skeptical of Russian honesty in the 90's based on their own behavior. The main issue you don't seem to consider is that the Russians also chose this path for themselves. Or rather, the most powerful Russian faction was not actually interested in rapprochement with the West. That's the limitation of your perspective.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:32 am to
quote:

He says shite like "Brah


You seem upset. You might as well join the cadre of retards who follow me around and accuse me of whatever without any proof. You can't seem to engage anything substantively, which is expecting far too much.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8364 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:37 am to
quote:

You might as well join the cadre of retards who follow me around and accuse me of whatever without any proof.


If you really have a cadre following you around I hope they don't expect you to lead them to a library or book store
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:39 am to
Lol this more seems like you don't like black people or the use of vernacular. I'd wager that I read more than anyone on this forum.
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
13309 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:40 am to
I agree that there are complex issues that sometimes can't be overcome.

But if the US South spent 4 years after 1860 raising and training state militias, building an arms manufacturing base, and building a iron clad navy, then the election of 1864 looks totally different.

"Elect Lincoln again and we seceed" would have ensured Lincoln wasn't reelected. And the South could have negotiated the end of slavery with tons of leverage.

In Ukraine both Obama and Trump and Biden had the opportunity to really pour the military aid to Kiev for 8 years.

If Ukraine had Patriots and Abrams and Bradleys and F16s by 2020 then there's no way Putin invades in 2022.

Putin invaded because A) He wanted the country B) He thought his military was way more competent than it actually was C) He was misinformed about Ukraine and it's people's desire to be independent of Russian rule, and that they wouldn't fight.

If you change that calculus by arming the country, then the war doesn't happen
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138772 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:42 am to
quote:

I told you explicitly that you treat any and all Russian factions, of which there are many, as negotiating in good faith.
That is a flatly stupid statement. You conflate the contention of no one negotiating in good faith with your idiotic invented premise.

I "fathomed" what you meant when I told you earlier that "you don't have a clue as to WTF my view can be boiled down to. You should. But you don't."
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8364 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:44 am to
quote:


If Ukraine had Patriots and Abrams and Bradleys and F16s by 2020 then there's no way Putin invades in 2022.


Agreed. Our foreign policy experts across multiple administrations apparently just... didn't expect this
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8364 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:44 am to
quote:

I'd wager that I read more than anyone on this forum.


Don't forget "I've been posting here for over a decade!" so you get the full message board Karen bingo card filled out
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138772 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:51 am to
quote:

You were completely wrong about Covid
----

Nah, I definitely wasn't
quote:

The lab leak theories were so fricking stupid and continue to be stupid. The morons who keep believing in it don't seem to understand how molecular level work is done, and they seem utterly resistant to why the lab leak theory was so stupid. LINK


Sorry, but OMG ....

Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:55 am to
quote:

That is a flatly stupid statement. You conflate the contention of no one negotiating in good faith with your idiotic invented premise.


No, it isn't. Is this going to be another thing where I have to produce more documentary evidence to make up for your lack of knowledge? And I said there were certain factions that were not interested in negotiating in good faith. Politics is factional.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8364 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:55 am to
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:58 am to
Yep the lab leak theories were very stupid. We've talked about this before. The only credence I can give to a possible lab leak is the improper handling of specimens, which is far more likely than the Chinese developing a method of handling RNA viruses which somehow do not require the use of specialized machinery and very specific buffers, of which there are only two or so companies that make them.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138772 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:58 am to
quote:

If you want to give Putin a pass
Putin and virtually the entire Russian body politic said NATO-to-Ukraine would mean war. They obviously failed to convince various counterparties. They certainly own portions of, or perhaps the near entirety of, that failure.
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
13309 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:58 am to
quote:

You don't know why the Polish invasion occurred. You should. At least you should know prior to posting as if you do.


Delicious
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:58 am to
Given you can't seem to engage on anything of substance, what would you like me to do? You just dislike me calling you brah a lot.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8364 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:01 am to
quote:

You just dislike me calling you brah a lot.


I actually don't mind it at all. I think its an obvious sign of low intelligence.
first pageprev pagePage 4019 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram