Started By
Message

re: LA AG gets restraining order over "Prediction Markets"

Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:26 pm to
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
68416 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:26 pm to
Posted by RadRob
Acadiana
Member since Oct 2021
352 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:38 pm to
Well, that didn't take long.

"Update to event contracts in Louisiana

Hi, a court order in Louisiana impacts our ability to offer event contracts in that state. Louisiana customers will no longer be able to open new positions in any event contracts on Robinhood, effective November 12, 2026.
We appreciate your understanding in this matter and we’ll keep you updated if anything changes.

– The Robinhood team"
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
10112 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:43 pm to
Boss Baby Barnes is a retard and this take is terrible.

Prediction markets and legalized sports betting has been objectively bad for society.

Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
62222 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

Casinos have apps, too


Neat. Ban those too.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
25112 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:56 pm to
Don't know anything about this ourt case, but holy shite, every damn ad on YouTube is Kalshi or Polymarket or some digital "pack ripping" gambling bullshite that I have no interest in. I have even told youtube to stop showing me those ads and they still bombard me everything time I am on there. Never placed a bet with any online gambling site/prediction market.

The shite is incredibly annoying.
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 8:57 pm
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
10022 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

From a philosophical perspective, I don’t think we should be regulating any of this.

However, from a pragmatic perspective, if we are going to regulate gambling, can someone explain to me how “prediction markets” are sufficiently different from “gambling” such that it should escape similar regulation?


I would say the distinction would be between a "game" like poker or baseball and "real life events" where occurrences carry irreversible weight, genuine moral stakes and existential outcomes.

From a pragmatic perspective it is not even easy to keep gambling from "cheating" and influencing where the stakes are contrived in games.

It could be argued that gambling financial interests to be turned toward to manipulating real world events would be a clear net negative for society.


I'm not trying to argue one side or the other just saying that would be a logical place to draw a distinction.

Posted by BamaSaint
Moh-beel
Member since Mar 2013
4262 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

These things need to be stopped. They are manipulating elections. People are going to vote based on what they bet on and it's not in the nature of our elections.

Is that the new excuse for the blue wave?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram