- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Discussion Thread
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:58 am to ducktale
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:58 am to ducktale
quote:
They dropped the firearm charge?
Yep. Completely legal for him to possess the weapon, and the curfew issue was dealt with (dropped early, I think). So he had every right to be there and to be armed. That was a big win. I hope the jury sees through the b.s. "provocation" evidence.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:59 am to Scruffy
quote:
They dropped the firearm charge?
Really? Why?
I thought that was the one thing they had him dead to rights on.
Prosecution this morning admitted the firearm was legal length, etc...
Posted on 11/15/21 at 10:00 am to Scruffy
quote:
Really? Why?
I thought that was the one thing they had him dead to rights on.
That's what the MSM wanted everyone to believe. Turns out he was legally fine with both being there and possessing the firearm. This isn't the full acquittal, but it's damn near over at this point.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 10:11 am to kennypowers
shite, judge setting up jury to believe that he didnt need to protect himself from McGinnis.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 10:11 am to JDPndahizzy
Which one was Mcginnis?
Posted on 11/15/21 at 10:12 am to ducktale
is that the blurry photo evidence of reckless endangerment?
im not sure where mcginnis came in.
im not sure where mcginnis came in.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 10:13 am to AMS
wasn't he the reporter dude walking around with him?
Posted on 11/15/21 at 10:14 am to AMS
Mcginnis was the guy standing behind Rosenbaum when he was shot. Reckless endangerment is putting others at risk by shooting in public.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 10:14 am to JDPndahizzy
quote:
wasn't he the reporter dude walking around with him?
Yes
Posted on 11/15/21 at 10:16 am to TDTOM
quote:
Mcginnis was the guy standing behind Rosenbaum when he was shot. Reckless endangerment is putting others at risk by shooting in public.
oh well he will probably not get charged with that. if the self defense vs rosenbaum is justified then i dont see why he would be guilty of that. the endangerment was not reckless it was purposeful defense
Posted on 11/15/21 at 10:19 am to AMS
quote:
oh well he will probably not get charged with that. if the self defense vs rosenbaum is justified then i dont see why he would be guilty of that. the endangerment was not reckless it was purposeful defense
Correct he won't be.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 10:21 am to AMS
quote:
oh well he will probably not get charged with that. if the self defense vs rosenbaum is justified then i dont see why he would be guilty of that. the endangerment was not reckless it was purposeful defense
Yeah I don't see how he could be found guilty of reckless endangerment if it was a justified self defense. "But what if the bullet didn't hit the person he was lawfully allowed to shoot" isn't the most solid reasoning imo.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 10:35 am to Ingeniero
How is anyone on the jury staying awake through this?
Posted on 11/15/21 at 11:00 am to tigerpimpbot
quote:I'll say it again. Trump dropped the ball by not using a preemptive full pardon. You can bet Biden will make sure he gets charged with federal crimes such as "crossing state lines to commit a crime" and something with a "hate crime" escalator. An unbiased judge/jury would laugh it out of court but that's something that doesn't exist where he'll file it.
Yep. Completely legal for him to possess the weapon, and the curfew issue was dealt with (dropped early, I think). So he had every right to be there and to be armed. That was a big win. I hope the jury sees through the b.s. "provocation" evidence.
I do think it might be a decent way for Biden to blunt the number of riots.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 11:00 am to SOLA
This judge is embarrassing himself. He's so chaotic in his thinking.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 11:00 am to SOLA
The term "reasonable" has got to be the most used word in the law books..
Posted on 11/15/21 at 11:01 am to SOLA
quote:They're arguing with the judge over what the jury should hear. They can't be in there for these motions/arguments.
How is anyone on the jury staying awake through this?
Posted on 11/15/21 at 11:03 am to JDPndahizzy
quote:And it's such a subjective word. What's reasonable to you is what may not be reasonable to someone else.
The term "reasonable" has got to be the most used word in the law books..
2 fricking hours of a closing argument by Littlefinger?!??
ETA: "I'm not going to comment on the lunch"

This post was edited on 11/15/21 at 11:05 am
Posted on 11/15/21 at 11:04 am to MSUDawg98
quote:
"I'm not going to comment on the lunch"


Back to top
