- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Karen Carter Peterson’s Anti-Child Marriage Bill Hurts The Cause More Than It Helps
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:24 pm
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:24 pm
LINK
Sneaky bitch is trying to use a bill to protect young girls to change the definition of marriage in Louisiana.
So the bill will die in committee because of this and no protections will be in place.
Sneaky bitch is trying to use a bill to protect young girls to change the definition of marriage in Louisiana.
quote:
SB 463 carries some language which is supposed to be innocuous – its basic gist is to make 18 the minimum age for marriage – but it’s a time bomb that would utterly destroy Louisiana family law. What might that be?
Check out lines 10-13 of the bill…
quote:
Got that? This isn’t a bill to stop child marriage. It’s a bill to redefine Louisiana’s marriage law so as to codify gay marriage.
So the bill will die in committee because of this and no protections will be in place.
15
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:26 pm to tommy2tone1999
Louisiana got da gay.
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:27 pm to tommy2tone1999
Sooo you’re anti gay marriage?
Time to move on bub, it’s 2018.
Time to move on bub, it’s 2018.
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:27 pm to tommy2tone1999
Karen Carter is a true POS I know about her from long before.
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:28 pm to tommy2tone1999
I wonder why she would want to do this....
Here’s her pic
Here’s her pic
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:28 pm to tommy2tone1999
Question: what negative impact would this have on your life?
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:28 pm to tommy2tone1999
government shouldn't be involved in marriage at all
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:29 pm to tommy2tone1999
You worried that because it's legal, you won't be able to resist the temptation to get gay married?
And it's legal either way.
And it's legal either way.
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:29 pm to tommy2tone1999
quote:
So the bill will die in committee because of this and no protections will be in place.
Protections from what?
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:30 pm to joeyb147
quote:
government shouldn't be involved in marriage at all
Then they shouldn't have gave incentives with tax breaks. That's discrimination against single people.
This post was edited on 3/29/18 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:31 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Sooo you’re anti gay marriage?
Time to move on bub, it’s 2018
When you're more worried about gays getting their little feelings hurt than protecting young girls, I'd say it's time for you to move on.
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:31 pm to tommy2tone1999
It should be codified, as well as marrying as many partners as you want to.
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:31 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:The farther we get away from traditional drpefinitions of family, the more fricked up this country becomes- in my opinion.
Question: what negative impact would this have on your life?
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:32 pm to tommy2tone1999
quote:
When you're more worried about gays getting their little feelings hurt than protecting young girls, I'd say it's time for you to move on.
They already are protected though...
Edit: what do you think the current marriage age is in LA? 16 year old girls can consent to frick under state law. Why shouldn’t they be allowed to marry??
This post was edited on 3/29/18 at 6:35 pm
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:33 pm to CCTider
quote:
Then they shouldn't have gave incentives worth tax breaks. It's discrimination against single people.
Or have spousal privilege or give spouses power of attorney in DNR cases or protect them from insurance companies trying to frick them over.
Lots of things legal marriage do to help people.
Absolutely no material ramifications to letting gay people have those protections.
Besides Bubba and Peggy Sue being worried they’re going to catch the gay!
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:34 pm to Geauxtiga
quote:
The farther we get away from traditional drpefinitions of family, the more fricked up this country becomes- in my opinion.
I think single parent households are a far FAR greater issue.
The issue isn’t the gender or sexual orientation of the parents, it’s the lack of parents.
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:35 pm to joeyb147
quote:if that were the case the government would play no role in alimony enforcement, child support and prosecution of deadbeat dads, and spousal inheritance
government shouldn't be involved in marriage at all
is that what you want?
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:36 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:I can get on bd with that.
I think single parent households are a far FAR greater issue.
The issue isn’t the gender or sexual orientation of the parents, it’s the lack of parents.
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:36 pm to Kafka
quote:
if that were the case the government would play no role in alimony enforcement, child support and prosecution of deadbeat dads, and spousal inheritance is that what you want?
Exactly, and why shouldn’t gay couples have those protections?
There is absolutely no law anywhere that says your little bigot church will ever have to marry gay people in the eyes of your lord.
None.
This has absolutely no negative impact on any straight people.
Posted on 3/29/18 at 6:44 pm to TheCaterpillar
I really want to know if OP thinks there is a legion of 13 year old girls in LA who are being married off to older men and that this bill was going to put an end to centuries of abusive marriages until the sick homosexuals stuck their noses into the situation.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News