- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury selection begins in trial of man who killed Joe McKnight
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:27 am to reggielendale
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:27 am to reggielendale
They were both weaving and cutting each other off for a while. It doesn't sound like one was following the other.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:30 am to reggielendale
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/24/20 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:30 am to Placebeaux
LINK Marine road rage
For those defending the killer, would you also defend the driver’s right in this video to calmly pull out a gun roll down his window and pew pew pew this guy?
For those defending the killer, would you also defend the driver’s right in this video to calmly pull out a gun roll down his window and pew pew pew this guy?
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:30 am to Steadyhands
quote:
Which is what I said further on in my statement. If he felt threatened with a man approaching his vehicle his first response should have been to drive off at that point
You could say this about McKnight too though. So you got cut off, who cares? Slow down and let the a-hole crash and kill himself.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:30 am to TH03
Here is the law
Any person "who is in a place where he or she has a right," including a public space, does not have an obligation "to retreat" if faced with a real or perceived threat and "may stand his or her ground and meet force with force."
During criminal court proceedings, a judge or jury can't consider the "possibility of retreat" as a factor in determining whether someone lawfully used force in self-defense.
No one acting in self-defense under these laws can be civilly prosecuted for the use of force, deadly or otherwise.
That is why it went to trial.
So did he have cars in front of him at the time? Could he have drove off?
Any person "who is in a place where he or she has a right," including a public space, does not have an obligation "to retreat" if faced with a real or perceived threat and "may stand his or her ground and meet force with force."
During criminal court proceedings, a judge or jury can't consider the "possibility of retreat" as a factor in determining whether someone lawfully used force in self-defense.
No one acting in self-defense under these laws can be civilly prosecuted for the use of force, deadly or otherwise.
That is why it went to trial.
So did he have cars in front of him at the time? Could he have drove off?
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:32 am to TH03
quote:OBJECTION! Hearsay.
They were both weaving and cutting each other off for a while. It doesn't sound like one was following the other.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:33 am to Placebeaux
That's not the part that's in question dude. It's about whether or not McKnight posed a threat.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:33 am to samson73103
quote:
It shouldn’t. The case should be decided by the letter of the law.
Well, you go live in theoretical land. Us folks in the real world will continue to factor in real world inputs.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:34 am to CarRamrod
quote:
Sheriff Normand said the confrontation began after both drivers were driving erratically, cutting each other off and zipping in front of each other, according to Mr. Gasser and witnesses.
This post was edited on 1/16/18 at 9:35 am
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:34 am to reggielendale
quote:If i felt my life or the life og my passenger was threatened. Absolutely.
For those defending the killer, would you also defend the driver’s right in this video to calmly pull out a gun roll down his window and pew pew pew this guy?
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:36 am to CarRamrod
quote:
ere was one particular car that looked aggressively parked out of a lane.
How does a car look “aggressively parked”? It seems to be in between the lines and parallel to the lines.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:37 am to Placebeaux
quote:doesnt matter.
So did he have cars in front of him at the time? Could he have drove off?
quote:
a judge or jury can't consider the "possibility of retreat" as a factor i
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:41 am to TH03
quote:like i said. This article is written to paint Gasser as admitting to a crime. I want to see where thaty information came from. Id be willing to bet a) if he did say this, that information is not out and b) he did not admit that.
Sheriff Normand said the confrontation began after both drivers were driving erratically, cutting each other off and zipping in front of each other, according to Mr. Gasser and witnesses.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:44 am to Placebeaux
The second JM left his car he was a direct threat,how was Gasser supposed to know what was about to happen ? he had no idea if JM was armed. Gasser by no means had to try and run, this was all on JM, Gasser will not do any time for this, he at that point was the victim, JM let his emotions get the best of him and it cost him his life.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:46 am to reggielendale
A lot more to this story will come out in the trial
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:47 am to CarRamrod
Did you read what I quoted? It's from the sheriff. Your position is that the new York times made that shite up? 
This post was edited on 1/16/18 at 9:49 am
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:49 am to reggielendale
quote:
How does a car look “aggressively parked”? It seems to be in between the lines and parallel to the lines.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 9:50 am to TH03
quote:well they havent been the most honest.
new York times made that shite up
Popular
Back to top



2




