- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury selection begins in trial of man who killed Joe McKnight
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:32 pm to tgrbaitn08
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:32 pm to tgrbaitn08
Maybe it's just me but unless McKnight put his hands on him I see three gunshots as excessive force.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:33 pm to lsupride87
quote:
His attorneys will not make a case for self defense, they won't
They will make the case for Castle Doctirne
The fact Gasser admits he "set off after Jm" will keep his attorneys away from self defense
But would you like to bet?
regardless of the defense.....I say Gasser walks
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:35 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
regardless of the defense.....I say Gasser walks
Possibly but a whole lot of people in the Will Smith thread said the same thing.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:36 pm to VABuckeye
quote:
Maybe it's just me but unless McKnight put his hands on him I see three gunshots as excessive force.
Nah, if there is evidence that McKnight was trying to get in Gasser's car, he'll be protected under the law.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:36 pm to tgrbaitn08
Fair enough
Let's talk outside of court and the legal system now
So you really think Gasser, a man who followed someone to a gas station before and physically assuaged them over road rage, who also admits to "setting off after JM due to being angry at his driving", really acted in self defense, and not hot head anger?
Let's talk outside of court and the legal system now
So you really think Gasser, a man who followed someone to a gas station before and physically assuaged them over road rage, who also admits to "setting off after JM due to being angry at his driving", really acted in self defense, and not hot head anger?
This post was edited on 1/16/18 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:37 pm to VABuckeye
If they can prove he was trying to get into the car, it's done. He has the right to use deadly force to prevent the entry into his car.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:41 pm to TH03
This will also be an interesting exchange in court
Prosecuter: "Mr. Gasser, you admit to setting off after McKnight when his driving angered you. What exactly were you planning on doing while setting off after him? "
Prosecuter: "Mr. Gasser, you admit to setting off after McKnight when his driving angered you. What exactly were you planning on doing while setting off after him? "
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:42 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Prosecuter: "Mr. Gasser, you admit to setting off after McKnight when his driving angered you. What exactly were you planning on doing while setting off after him? "
Tell him he was driving in an unsafe manner.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:44 pm to TH03
Prosecuter: "in 2006, you physically assaulted another human when they upset you on the road. After punching them in the head, you said, "i will get you". Now that you have gun, were you going after McKnight to "get him""
I know that isn't allowed but frick it seems pretty relevant here
I know that isn't allowed but frick it seems pretty relevant here
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:47 pm to TH03
I mean this mother ducker axtually followed someone to a gas station and beat them while telling them he would get them at this exact same intersection
Now, he admits to following after McKnight. There was a chance jm was going down that day no matter what
Now, he admits to following after McKnight. There was a chance jm was going down that day no matter what
This post was edited on 1/16/18 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:49 pm to lsupride87
quote:
So you really think Gasser, a man who followed someone to a gas station before and physically assuaged them over road rage, who also admits to "setting off after JM due to being angry at his driving", really acted in self defense, and not hot head anger?
I think it's plausible to believe he was in some sort of fear...whether it was for his life or that he was about to get his arse kicked.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:50 pm to Deactived
quote:
they arent. the line to the right of Joe's car is not the intersection line. Joe wasnt even in a lane
It was a lane...
Don't get me wrong, he pulled up to argue, but he was still in a lane.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:51 pm to tgrbaitn08
And from a non legal standpoint, when you are in fear because you are chasing another human being, an action you have done before which led to you assaulting a person , your fear does not get you out of murder in my eyes, because you initiated and brought upon said fear
I understand certain aspects of the law read differently
I understand certain aspects of the law read differently
This post was edited on 1/16/18 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:52 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
I think it's plausible to believe he was in some sort of fear...whether it was for his life or that he was about to get his arse kicked
It's not like you can't see how big JM is in the car. Based on his history, I tend to think he was ready to fight or shoot JM from the start.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:53 pm to slackster
He's technically in the right turn lane where no one would still be facing south at that point.
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:53 pm to Deactived
quote:Whats your issue? Jm was in a lane
Jones
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:53 pm to lsupride87
quote:
because you initiated and brought upon said fear
Well JM cut him off first..thats what initiated the chase
Posted on 1/16/18 at 2:54 pm to TH03
I don't get the big football player argument either. McKnight was 5'11", 205 lbs.
Popular
Back to top


2




