- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/24/24 at 12:47 pm to cgrand
Crichton, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
A judge must “be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it.” La. Code of Jud. Conduct, Canon 3(A)(1). As explained in the per curiam opinion, the law providing for the manner in which to accept and record criminal verdicts is both fundamental and clear, see La.C.Cr.P. arts. 810, 811, as is the law barring judges from meeting privately with the jury during deliberations, see La.C.Cr.P. art. 791; see also State v. Frisby, 19 La.Ann. 143 (1867). Here, the trial judge’s blatant violation of these laws shocks the conscience and implicates Canon 3(A)(1) of the Louisiana Code of Judicial Conduct.
A judge must “be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it.” La. Code of Jud. Conduct, Canon 3(A)(1). As explained in the per curiam opinion, the law providing for the manner in which to accept and record criminal verdicts is both fundamental and clear, see La.C.Cr.P. arts. 810, 811, as is the law barring judges from meeting privately with the jury during deliberations, see La.C.Cr.P. art. 791; see also State v. Frisby, 19 La.Ann. 143 (1867). Here, the trial judge’s blatant violation of these laws shocks the conscience and implicates Canon 3(A)(1) of the Louisiana Code of Judicial Conduct.
Posted on 5/24/24 at 12:58 pm to High C
quote:
I’m obviously not an attorney, but this was a jury trial, and the jury found the defendant not guilty of the charges. How is it legal for a judge to meet with the jury post-verdict and coerce them into changing their decision? Am I taking crazy pills?
It’s not legal. And the appellate court smacked her down for it. It’s embarrassing to be this bad at your job. Cant tell a queen anything on her throne tho.
This post was edited on 5/24/24 at 12:59 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)