- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Journalism professor: Leaks are meant to serve the public, not institutions
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:25 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:25 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:So...not the leaker. Got it.
It benefitted the Democrat party and the body destruction industry.
The Democrat party was the intended benefit, mid terms.
Democrats leak shite to piss off overly dramatic women
1
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:26 am to Gravitiger
quote:
So...not the leaker. Got it.
True
Leaks are not meant to serve the public. They are meant to benefit the Democrat party.
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:27 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:So we agree
True
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:29 am to Gravitiger
quote:
That it really has no individual benefit for the leaker.
I mean sure I guess in a literal sense.
I would argue that if your morals and values were being attacked (I'm not opining on the legitimacy of those) than leaking something to stop a decision that you feel attalll) that attack on those morals and values does benefit you personally.
But again, I'm not sure what point you are trying to make as it's quite clear why this person leaked what they did. You can try to get into some weird intangible arguement about individual benefit, but it's pointless to the discussion.
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:29 am to Roy Curado
quote:
Jerry Ceppos, former dean of LSU’s Manship School of Mass Communication, teaches media ethics there.
They make PI lawyers look like honest workers.
quote:
Contact him at jceppos@lsu.edu.
Tell him how we feel.
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:30 am to Gravitiger
quote:
How does that benefit them specifically?
If anything, all it's done is made the majority more entrenched.
Yep, they are definitely not benefiting from having crazy people protesting outside of Supreme Court justices homes. You are deliberately being obtuse here.
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:34 am to Jcorye1
quote:No, they aren't. Again, if anything, it is making their side look ridiculous and only entrenching the majority further.
Yep, they are definitely not benefiting from having crazy people protesting outside of Supreme Court justices homes. You are deliberately being obtuse here.
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:34 am to GetBackToWork
quote:
Liberals like leaking.
This must be why the potato wears a diaper.
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:36 am to Gravitiger
quote:
Again, if anything, it is making their side look ridiculou
That's your opinion. Many people disagree with you.
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:37 am to Gravitiger
That's your read of a situation, none of us actually know what the heck is going on in those chambers.
Dude, woman, Xie whatever leaked information to either pressure them into change or get them to dig in on their decisions. I don't really care about the semantics, but the leak is obviously an attempt to manipulate the court by using public opinion.
Dude, woman, Xie whatever leaked information to either pressure them into change or get them to dig in on their decisions. I don't really care about the semantics, but the leak is obviously an attempt to manipulate the court by using public opinion.
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:37 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:Not the people I talk to (or anyone here on this board).
That's your opinion. Many people disagree with you.
I know a lot of liberal people who are worried about Roe being overturned, but none who support protesting the homes of SCOTUS justices.
This post was edited on 5/11/22 at 10:40 am
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:38 am to Jcorye1
quote:Which justice do you think might change his/her vote based on public pressure? They're all hardcore on this issue.
That's your read of a situation, none of us actually know what the heck is going on in those chambers.
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:40 am to Gravitiger
There have been multiple reports that Roberts is attempting to change votes, and I don't see how Kav especially is considered a pro life hardliners.
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:42 am to Jcorye1
quote:That's how their behind-the-scenes always works. Roberts tries to convince everyone to observe precedent and/or limit their holdings to the specific facts of the case. The winds of the court should move as slowly as possible (except regarding voting rights). It's his thing.
There have been multiple reports that Roberts is attempting to change votes
quote:Read his only opinion on the topic--his dissent in Garza v. Hargan.
I don't see how Kav especially is considered a pro life hardliners.
This post was edited on 5/11/22 at 10:54 am
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:44 am to Roy Curado
jceppos@lsu.edu
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:52 am to Gravitiger
quote:
Not the people I talk to
Lets be generous and say you talked to 1,000 people. You talked to .003% of the adult population. And I'm sure your sample was extremely representative.
Not that your idiotic anecdote has anything to do with your original arguement anyways, which was also stupid.
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:54 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:My original argument was that your original argument was wrong...which you ultimately agreed with.
Not that your idiotic anecdote has anything to do with your original arguement anyways, which was also stupid.
This post was edited on 5/11/22 at 10:55 am
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:59 am to Gravitiger
quote:
My original argument was that your original argument was wrong...which you ultimately agreed with.
Your original arguement was individuals derive no benefit from political leaks which is stupid.
Posted on 5/11/22 at 11:07 am to Mingo Was His NameO
No, it wasn't. It was that not all leaks are to/for the benefit of the individuals who leak them.
Posted on 5/11/22 at 11:10 am to Gravitiger
quote:
No, it wasn't. It was that not all leaks are to/for the benefit of the individuals who leak them.
quote:
How did this leak serve whatever law clerk or security officer leaked it?
quote:
by Gravitiger
You wanting to get in the weeds about the definition of benefit, or whatever you are trying to do, is really quite bizarre
This post was edited on 5/11/22 at 11:11 am
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News