- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: JFK and AI
Posted on 3/22/25 at 10:54 am to Nutriaitch
Posted on 3/22/25 at 10:54 am to Nutriaitch
quote:
First explanation says back of head would be blown off if shot came from the front. Second explanation said his large exit wound was in the top/front (which would mean shot came from back).
Was there a large exit wound on the top/front of JFK’s head?
I ask because the film footage I’ve seen clearly shows the back of his head blowing backward towards the trunk of the car. There is also autopsy photos showing the back of his head basically gone.
Posted on 3/22/25 at 3:13 pm to Darth_Vader
The exit wound was from the front-right side of JFK’s head (shot from the back-left side). Oswald was on the back-right side of JFK’s head
LINK
LINK
Posted on 3/22/25 at 3:51 pm to Ping Pong
Waste of time.LHO never pulled a trigger that day.
Posted on 3/22/25 at 3:55 pm to Ping Pong
quote:
There is no evidence that a 2nd shooter existed.
His driver.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:13 pm to Jake88
Not according to eye witnesses & physics
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:17 pm to BigNastyTiger417
quote:Eyewitnesses are unreliable, especially those that pop up years later. The physics disprove it as well. Someone in either this thread or another recent one laid it out, as has Gerald Posner and several others. You're going to keep believing foolishness because it's more interesting. In all of these releases where is the shooter from the grassy knoll? Nowhere because it's a fantasy.
Not according to eye witnesses & physics
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:46 pm to Jake88
Actually, eyewitnesses are one of the most reliable sources utilized throughout history. It is literally what our criminal justice system uses today…just like being used to compose the Holy Bible.
Also, I’m speaking of the immediate eye witness accounts that exist from the JFK assasination.
…. Also, physics has disproved the lone shooter as well as the magic bullet theory.
Also, I’m speaking of the immediate eye witness accounts that exist from the JFK assasination.
…. Also, physics has disproved the lone shooter as well as the magic bullet theory.
This post was edited on 3/23/25 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:01 pm to BigNastyTiger417
quote:And it's often incorrect.
Actually, eyewitnesses are one of the most reliable sources utilized throughout history. It is literally what our criminal justice system uses today
quote:
No witnesses definitively identified a shooter on the grassy knoll during the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, although many believed shots originated from that area
There were witnesses that day who thought they heard shots from the knoll but...
quote:
Earwitnesses to the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) did not agree about the location of the gunman even though their judgments about the number and timing of the gunshots were reasonably consistent. Even earwitnesses at the same general location disagreed. An examination of the acoustics of supersonic bullets and the characteristics of human sound localization help explain the general disagreement about the origin of the gunshots
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:09 pm to Jake88
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:14 pm to BigNastyTiger417
There was no magic bullet. The back seat was wider so JFK was not directly behind the governor.
What Physics Reveals About the JFK Assassination
And lastly another modern ballistics study
I have to go.
What Physics Reveals About the JFK Assassination
And lastly another modern ballistics study
I have to go.
This post was edited on 3/23/25 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:29 pm to Jake88
Disproven. One bullet cannot cause 7 wounds while hitting bone, etc.
You can disbelieve facts. It doesn’t make your opinion a fact.
You can disbelieve facts. It doesn’t make your opinion a fact.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:30 pm to Ping Pong
quote:
There is no evidence that a 2nd shooter existed.
There is a ton of evidence. What are you talking about?
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:32 pm to monsterballads
Some people disbelieve evidence (& also believe Earth is flat)
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:07 pm to Tbone2
quote:
There was a 4th shot. It richocheted off the cement and hit some guy in the shin. He went to the hospital that day. The impact could be seen on the cement.
According to The Warren Report there were only three shots and this is the one that missed the motorcade. The second (Magic Bullet) went through JFK's neck and did all the damage to Connally only to magically fall out on the gurney seemingly pristine. The third was the Kennedy kill shot.
The whole idea of his head lurching backward on a shot which supposedly came from behind always seemed preposterous. But what I've never heard addressed or explained is how the Connally x-rays clearly show more bullet fragments in his body than are missing from the Magic Bullet. It's a complete impossibility,
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:51 pm to BigNastyTiger417
quote:
His head also went back & to the left.
JFK’s head went slightly forward when it was hit and then he recoiled backwards. His head moves forward from the force of a shot from the rear.

Posted on 3/23/25 at 7:46 pm to BigNastyTiger417
quote:Two bullets made contact with the occupants of the vehicle.
Disproven. One bullet cannot cause 7 wounds while hitting bone, etc.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 8:13 pm to The Boat
quote:
JFK’s head went slightly forward when it was hit and then he recoiled backwards. His head moves forward from the force of a shot from the rear.
This is correct. Head forward then back, head debris forward and up. Rear head shot.
This post was edited on 3/23/25 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 3/23/25 at 8:28 pm to Jake88
I understand. There were a total of 9 wounds.
- allegedly 3 shots fired.
- bullet 1 = misses everyone
- bullet 2 = accounts for 7 wounds between JFK & Connelly
- bullet 3 = accounts for entry & exit wound (kill shot)
- allegedly 3 shots fired.
- bullet 1 = misses everyone
- bullet 2 = accounts for 7 wounds between JFK & Connelly
- bullet 3 = accounts for entry & exit wound (kill shot)
Posted on 3/23/25 at 8:43 pm to BigNastyTiger417
quote:Three entry, three exit wounds and a thigh. So? In one of the links I sent you, ballistic experts fired that model gun and round into 3ft of pine and it was retrieved in good shape.
bullet 2 = accounts for 7 wounds between JFK & Connelly
quote:
FLATOW: And so your bullet theory matched the actual testing evidence and the actual - the body, of how it entered Governor Connally.
HAAG: Yes. It's easy to see, if one takes the time to learn about this evidence, that this bullet can easily go through two people. In fact, if you line them up and add them together, this bullet, from what Mike was just telling you about three feet of wood, would go through two people and start to enter a third one.
FLATOW: So there's no reason then to call it a magic bullet.
HAAG: It is not magic. It never was magic, and neither is it pristine.
FLATOW: When you say that, tell us what you mean, it wasn't pristine.
HAAG: If one looks at the Warren Commission exhibits, and they're downloadable, the base view, looking at the back end of the bullet, it's oval. It's out of round. This is the consequence of slamming into Governor Connally while in yaw. That squeezes the bullet just like you'd squeeze a toothpaste tube and some of the soft lead core will now be extruded,
Posted on 3/23/25 at 9:05 pm to winkchance
A known and observed Oswald got his hands on a military grade rifle and a job at a building providing a perfect shooters nest. Then a man was allowed to access Oswald to murder him before he could talk. This is the conspiracy, multiple shooters is an unlikely theory.
Popular
Back to top
