Started By
Message

re: JFK and AI

Posted on 3/22/25 at 10:54 am to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
68864 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 10:54 am to
quote:

First explanation says back of head would be blown off if shot came from the front. Second explanation said his large exit wound was in the top/front (which would mean shot came from back).


Was there a large exit wound on the top/front of JFK’s head?

I ask because the film footage I’ve seen clearly shows the back of his head blowing backward towards the trunk of the car. There is also autopsy photos showing the back of his head basically gone.
Posted by BigNastyTiger417
Member since Nov 2021
4220 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 3:13 pm to
The exit wound was from the front-right side of JFK’s head (shot from the back-left side). Oswald was on the back-right side of JFK’s head

LINK
Posted by OLDBEACHCOMBER
Member since Jan 2004
7333 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 3:51 pm to
Waste of time.LHO never pulled a trigger that day.
Posted by Adajax
Member since Nov 2015
7363 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

There is no evidence that a 2nd shooter existed.


His driver.
Posted by BigNastyTiger417
Member since Nov 2021
4220 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:13 pm to
Not according to eye witnesses & physics
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
74935 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Not according to eye witnesses & physics
Eyewitnesses are unreliable, especially those that pop up years later. The physics disprove it as well. Someone in either this thread or another recent one laid it out, as has Gerald Posner and several others. You're going to keep believing foolishness because it's more interesting. In all of these releases where is the shooter from the grassy knoll? Nowhere because it's a fantasy.
Posted by BigNastyTiger417
Member since Nov 2021
4220 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:46 pm to
Actually, eyewitnesses are one of the most reliable sources utilized throughout history. It is literally what our criminal justice system uses today…just like being used to compose the Holy Bible.

Also, I’m speaking of the immediate eye witness accounts that exist from the JFK assasination.

…. Also, physics has disproved the lone shooter as well as the magic bullet theory.
This post was edited on 3/23/25 at 3:54 pm
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
74935 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

Actually, eyewitnesses are one of the most reliable sources utilized throughout history. It is literally what our criminal justice system uses today
And it's often incorrect.
quote:

No witnesses definitively identified a shooter on the grassy knoll during the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, although many believed shots originated from that area


There were witnesses that day who thought they heard shots from the knoll but...
quote:

Earwitnesses to the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) did not agree about the location of the gunman even though their judgments about the number and timing of the gunshots were reasonably consistent. Even earwitnesses at the same general location disagreed. An examination of the acoustics of supersonic bullets and the characteristics of human sound localization help explain the general disagreement about the origin of the gunshots
Posted by BigNastyTiger417
Member since Nov 2021
4220 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:09 pm to
LINK

LINK

This post was edited on 3/23/25 at 4:13 pm
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
74935 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:14 pm to
There was no magic bullet. The back seat was wider so JFK was not directly behind the governor.

What Physics Reveals About the JFK Assassination

And lastly another modern ballistics study

I have to go.
This post was edited on 3/23/25 at 4:22 pm
Posted by BigNastyTiger417
Member since Nov 2021
4220 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:29 pm to
Disproven. One bullet cannot cause 7 wounds while hitting bone, etc.

You can disbelieve facts. It doesn’t make your opinion a fact.
Posted by monsterballads
Gulf of America
Member since Jun 2013
30807 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

There is no evidence that a 2nd shooter existed.


There is a ton of evidence. What are you talking about?
Posted by BigNastyTiger417
Member since Nov 2021
4220 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:32 pm to
Some people disbelieve evidence (& also believe Earth is flat)
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
20927 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

There was a 4th shot. It richocheted off the cement and hit some guy in the shin. He went to the hospital that day. The impact could be seen on the cement.

According to The Warren Report there were only three shots and this is the one that missed the motorcade. The second (Magic Bullet) went through JFK's neck and did all the damage to Connally only to magically fall out on the gurney seemingly pristine. The third was the Kennedy kill shot.

The whole idea of his head lurching backward on a shot which supposedly came from behind always seemed preposterous. But what I've never heard addressed or explained is how the Connally x-rays clearly show more bullet fragments in his body than are missing from the Magic Bullet. It's a complete impossibility,
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
171575 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

His head also went back & to the left.

JFK’s head went slightly forward when it was hit and then he recoiled backwards. His head moves forward from the force of a shot from the rear.

Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
74935 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

Disproven. One bullet cannot cause 7 wounds while hitting bone, etc.
Two bullets made contact with the occupants of the vehicle.
Posted by zippyputt
Member since Jul 2005
6465 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

JFK’s head went slightly forward when it was hit and then he recoiled backwards. His head moves forward from the force of a shot from the rear.


This is correct. Head forward then back, head debris forward and up. Rear head shot.
This post was edited on 3/23/25 at 8:15 pm
Posted by BigNastyTiger417
Member since Nov 2021
4220 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 8:28 pm to
I understand. There were a total of 9 wounds.

- allegedly 3 shots fired.
- bullet 1 = misses everyone
- bullet 2 = accounts for 7 wounds between JFK & Connelly
- bullet 3 = accounts for entry & exit wound (kill shot)
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
74935 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

bullet 2 = accounts for 7 wounds between JFK & Connelly
Three entry, three exit wounds and a thigh. So? In one of the links I sent you, ballistic experts fired that model gun and round into 3ft of pine and it was retrieved in good shape.

quote:

FLATOW: And so your bullet theory matched the actual testing evidence and the actual - the body, of how it entered Governor Connally.

HAAG: Yes. It's easy to see, if one takes the time to learn about this evidence, that this bullet can easily go through two people. In fact, if you line them up and add them together, this bullet, from what Mike was just telling you about three feet of wood, would go through two people and start to enter a third one.

FLATOW: So there's no reason then to call it a magic bullet.

HAAG: It is not magic. It never was magic, and neither is it pristine.

FLATOW: When you say that, tell us what you mean, it wasn't pristine.

HAAG: If one looks at the Warren Commission exhibits, and they're downloadable, the base view, looking at the back end of the bullet, it's oval. It's out of round. This is the consequence of slamming into Governor Connally while in yaw. That squeezes the bullet just like you'd squeeze a toothpaste tube and some of the soft lead core will now be extruded,


Posted by PalletJack
LA by birth, TX by choice
Member since Oct 2024
429 posts
Posted on 3/23/25 at 9:05 pm to
A known and observed Oswald got his hands on a military grade rifle and a job at a building providing a perfect shooters nest. Then a man was allowed to access Oswald to murder him before he could talk. This is the conspiracy, multiple shooters is an unlikely theory.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram