Started By
Message
locked post

ISIS ATGM destroys Iraqi M1 Abrams tank

Posted on 11/2/16 at 10:19 am
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 10:19 am
Yahoo: US tanks have fallen behind in tech advancement

Embeded link of tank destruction and cook off

quote:

A video showing an ISIS-fired, Russian-made anti-tank guided missile (ATGM) obliterating a US-made M1 Abrams tank illustrates the disturbing degree to which the US's tanks have fallen behind on the modern battlefield.

In Syria alone, eight different types of ATGMs threaten any armored division, the Congressional Research Service states. There's no reason to believe a more favorable situation exists in Iraq.

The US's M1 Abrams, first introduced in 1979, has undergone a number of updates to deal with evolving threats on the battlefield, but it has fallen behind in a key area — active protection.
This post was edited on 11/2/16 at 10:27 am
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
20274 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 10:27 am to
IIRC, the M1 the Iraqi's have aren't the upgraded/up-armored ones.

Darth is no where to be seen..
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
96848 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Kingdom of Islam

quote:

I'm not supporting any GROUP or ORGANISATION in this conflict. Please notice this.


Mmmmhmmm
Posted by onelochevy
Slidell, LA
Member since Jan 2011
18316 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 10:29 am to
this video was covered last week.

LINK
This post was edited on 11/2/16 at 10:31 am
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
44770 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 10:30 am to
I'm disappointed in the lack of Allah Akbar's
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 10:42 am to
quote:

this video was covered last week.



Thanks I'll read that thread.

Darth and others providing good info......
Posted by TrebleHook
Member since Jun 2016
1356 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 10:43 am to
Wouldn't an anti-tank missle take out any modern tank, depending on where it hits?
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Wouldn't an anti-tank missle take out any modern tank, depending on where it hits?



I'm no expert, but I think the answer to that is "no".

There are defensive measures (active and passive) that come into play. The point of the article is that the US has fallen behind Israel and possibly Russia in the active defensive measure category for their tanks.

(although the tank in question was undoubtedly an expert model and therefore presumably not equipped with the latest and greatest current US technology.)
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51395 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 11:07 am to
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't tanks a bit antiquated weapon of war in present times? Not a particularly effective piece of equipment in urban settings.
Posted by Hog on the Hill
AR
Member since Jun 2009
13493 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 11:18 am to
Export model M1. Who cares.

Tons of Russian tanks have been destroyed by ATGMs in Syria, but they're also export models.
Posted by BackWoodsTiger
Member since Sep 2008
6148 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't tanks a bit antiquated weapon of war in present times? Not a particularly effective piece of equipment in urban settings.
A lot of improvements have been made to our tanks for dealing with urban environments. TUSK(Tank Urban Survival Kit),namely.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
73574 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 11:51 am to
quote:

ISIS ATGM destroys Iraqi M1 Abrams tank by Sid in Lakeshore



First off....

Whoever wrote that article is an non-tanking idiot who doesn't know shite from shineola when it comes to the M1.

What you're seeing in the video is not an M1 being "destroyed" or "obliterated" by a ATGM. Instead you're seeing one of the most innovative crew protection features of the Abrams working exactly as designed.

Notice the hit comes at the rear of the turret. That's where the main ammo rack is located. Here's a diagram of what it looks like....


(This illustration is not exactly perfect because it fials to show that the ammo rack is totally separate from the crew compartment. The only time the ammo rack is open to the crew compartment is when the loader open the door to it to retrieve a round. This process take less than five seconds before the door closes again automatically. One thing of importance to note though is that the ammo is stored facing backwards. This is done so that if the ammo starts cooking off, it does so away from the crew compartment instead of toward the crew compartment.)

Now, the entire rear of that turret is specifically designed to blow out, up, and away from the rest of the tank if it's hit. In other words, if that ammo rack is full of 120mm rounds and takes a hit, you'll have an impressive fireball (like you see in the video). But once it burns out, the tank can be towed back to brigade level maintenance, repaired, and returned to active duty. As for the crew, unless they had that door open, they're perfectly fine. To see what I'm talking about watch this video...

LINK

Notice how from the outside the tank looks to be roasting? But look at the interior view, everything is fine inside the crew compartment.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 12:32 pm to
Wow, thanks for the clarification.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
45118 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 12:41 pm to
Darth,

I'd like you to impregnate me.


carry on sir
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
73574 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Wow, thanks for the clarification.


No problem.

And in case anyone is wondering how this would go down if the Kornet hit the front of the turret, well just look at this...



Do you see the small storage box attached to the side of the turret towards the front? Now look right behind that for the smoke grenade launcher (with canvas cover). Right there in that small space between that box and the smoke launcher is where the frontal armor of the turret ends. In other words, everything from that launcher on the side of the turret going forward is armor.

As for the "blowout" ammo storage area, it basically starts right behind the tank commander's hatch. Anything hits behind that spot, and you get the harmless "blowout effect".

As far as the turret goes, about the only are that's vulnerable is area starting at rear of the TC's hatch and going forward to the box you see right in front of it. That's the gunner's main sight BTW.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138891 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

There are defensive measures (active and passive) that come into play. The point of the article is that the US has fallen behind Israel and possibly Russia in the active defensive measure category for their tanks

Israelis have the advantage of not having to make a tank that's capable of being transported by air so they can make them as heavy and big as they want.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
73574 posts
Posted on 11/2/16 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Israelis have the advantage of not having to make a tank that's capable of being transported by air so they can make them as heavy and big as they want.


The Israeli Merkava weighs about the same as the M1A2 I believe.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 11/3/16 at 12:49 am to
That is such a bad arse looking vehicle. would love to take a ride. I envy you guys (sometimes, ).
Posted by geaux88
Northshore, LA
Member since Oct 2003
16355 posts
Posted on 11/3/16 at 3:14 am to
Thank you Darth for your clarification with facts... I found the premise in the OP's post suspect, (NOT THE OP), but as a former Artillery officer I found it hard to believe that a Russian made portable/light infantry type of ATGM poses a significant threat to an M-1....
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
59234 posts
Posted on 11/3/16 at 3:29 am to
Is there a tank that can't be transported by air?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram