re: Is what the US did in WWII the most impressive thing a country’s ever done?

Wow, I had never read about that before. Thanks for the article. Interesting reading.

quote:

---

If Hitler had invaded a month earlier, I think he takes the Soviet Union

---

Possibly, although even before the harsh winter set in, the German supply lines were stretched to the breaking point. That extra month could have made a world of difference, though.

Another thing that Hitler did that, in retrospect, was probably a huge blunder, was delaying the attack on Moscow and diverting a large portion of Army Group Center (including the 2nd Panzer Group under Heinz Guderian) southwards to complete the encirclement of the Soviets in the Kiev pocket with Army Group South. Guderian was supposedly livid with anger that he was being diverted south. Capturing Moscow might have been the thing that caused a collapse in Soviet resistance, since it was an important rail hub and also a symbol of national pride. Stalin may not have survived the loss of Moscow. He may well have been overthrown in that event.

Just read about Eastern European Front during WW2. I’m not hear to argue but pointing out to OP the answer to his question is no.

Cripple the nazis by collapsing the eastern front. Look at when Russia entered WW2. Now look at when we did.

Not arguing with your understanding. I know I can’t change your thinking. Just hope other viewers of this post actually get a grasp about the war and understand the facts.

quote:

---

Fire bombing killed more in Japan pound for pound than the nukes did.

---

True. Lemay's XXI Bomber Command virtually destroyed 66 or 67 Japanese cities with incendiary raids.

I am convinced however, that the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were game changers in getting Japan to capitulate. The hardliners in the Japanese Army (which was ascendant in Japan's ruling circle) were complete fanatics who were prepared for Japan to fight to the bitter end. Their goal was to inflict such horrific casualties on the U.S. forces that it would enable the Japanese to achieve a negotiated settlement, instead of unconditional surrender. They called this plan, "Operation Ketsugo" ("Decisive"). And the planned invasion of Kyushu (Operation Olympic) by U.S. forces would have been a bloodbath (imho), as the Japanese were going to have in place about 600,000 troops in prepared defenses on the island, far more than the initial planners of Olympic had envisioned. The ratio of American attackers to Japanese defenders would have been about 1:1, far below the accepted ratio of 3:1 dictated by military doctrine at the time.

quote:

---

You'll have people on here shortly trying to convince you that the Soviet Union/Russia did most of the heavy fighting even though they got it handed to them 40 years earlier one on one against Japan.

---

The truth of the matter is without American help the USSR would have collapsed. Period. Take away the assistance given by the US, the Red Army would have no fuel for their tanks, no way to transport their army, and no way to feed their army. Take away American assistance and the Red Army would have been an immobilized mob of starving, diseased men dressed in rags and bare feet with their tanks and artillery both stuck in the rear area with empty fuel tanks.

Stalin thought he was going to be executed by a coalition of Molotov, Beria etc. after Hitler invaded. To his surprise they came to him on hand and knee.

quote:

---

Just read about Eastern European Front during WW2. I’m not hear to argue but pointing out to OP the answer to his question is no.

---

Tell me, how is it impressive that Stalin, a ruthless dictator, sent human wave after human wave assault on German positions? How is it impressive the absurdity of everything about the Red Army and the USSR at that time?

There’s an old story of a US officer discussing tactics with a Red Army officer and when the topic of minefields came up, the Red Army officer said “we simply advance as if they’re not even there.”

Real impressive by that military.

quote:

---

Winning our independence against the uk at the height of their empire changed the entire world.

---

It did change the world, but I wouldn't call late-18th century Great Britain the "height of their empire." The British reached their peak strength in the years leading up to World War I. The Great War effectively began their downfall as the world's most dominant power with World War II finally bringing about its fall.

By 1945, the United States and the Soviet Union had surpassed the British Empire in just about every category. The Royal Navy, going into World War II, was considered to be the finest on earth. At the end of the Second World War, the United States was inarguably the planet's dominant naval power.

I would argue that it wasn't until the Napoleonic Wars that Great Britain began to rise to their pre-World War I heights, however.