Started By
Message

re: Is there a backup for the Old River control structure?

Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:11 am to
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
45873 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:11 am to
quote:

think overtopping and scouring will one day lead to it’s failure. Not because floods are getting worse but the silting downstream is causing higher water levels for the same flow


Silt that used to leave the river and get deposited on adjacent land is now forced to stay in the river.

Dredging picks it up and kicks it downstream a bit.

That’s a never ending relationship.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26413 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Silt that used to leave the river and get deposited on adjacent land is now forced to stay in the river.

Dredging picks it up and kicks it downstream a bit.

That’s a never ending relationship.



Every time they open Morganza, they slow the flow south of that point substantially and rapidly.....which results in suspended sediment dropping and building up on the riverbed instead of being carried downstream.

They really need to dredge between Morganza and Baton Rouge, or they will end up having to open up the spillway more often in the future.
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
49175 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:17 am to
quote:

or they will end up having to open up the spillway more often in the future.

They already are over the past 10-11 years.

All the housing and urban development upstream (across the entire watershed) is only going to create more and more significant flooding in the decades to come. Unless they do things to keep up with flood control we or our children will eventually see the ORCS catastrophically fail.

Not that most things man does will prevent it. Nature will eventually remind us who is in charge.
This post was edited on 2/15/22 at 9:21 am
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
29258 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:23 am to
quote:

if the river busts through no one knows if it'll groove a deeper knotch down the current low sill structure channel


The river would relatively quickly form a new, steeper channel towards the Atchafalaya River if it broke through. The soil outside of the Mississippi channel is much softer than that in the channel. At normal water levels, the Mississippi is ~20' above the Atchafalaya. It can be much higher during flood conditions. That's why the fix at low water is way tougher than people are assuming. That new low water level would be the current low water level of the Mississippi channel, which is still a metric frick-ton of water.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:29 am to
quote:

They really need to dredge between Morganza and Baton Rouge, or they will end up having to open up the spillway more often in the future.

Thank you Jones Act
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
49175 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:39 am to
quote:

At normal water levels, the Mississippi is ~20' above the Atchafalaya

I didn’t know that. Is that true or are you making shite up on the spot?

If true, that makes the thought of the ORCS failing that much more concerning. No way they’d be able to tame it enough to rebuild. Odds are they’d have to find a new area to build it. But where? Would there even be another place that would be feasible?


For the record, this topic has always intrigued me. Of course hopefully it never happens but it surely will eventually.
This post was edited on 2/15/22 at 9:42 am
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
29258 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 9:49 am to
Going by memory. Looks like I was a incorrect. 17-19' foot difference at bed elevation.

quote:

Thus, the difference in elevation between the bed of the Mississippi and the Atchafalaya—currently about 17 - 19 feet at typical flow rates of the rivers


Source

This post was edited on 2/15/22 at 9:50 am
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
49175 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 11:06 am to
Still, that’s a big difference.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52912 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 11:10 am to
quote:

When the river is low enough it’s leveed and doesn’t even interact with the spillway structure.


You do realize that if the structure fails at a high water point, the river will take out the levee, concrete and all, and gouge a new river bed.

Not saying they can’t reclaim it, but it’s hardly as easy as you’ll make it sound, like the river will naturally dry up on the alternate course in a month or two.
Posted by beerandt
Member since Jan 2020
321 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

If conditions get bad enough the Army Corps of Engineers have levee designations to blow so the levees...


No they don't.

quote:

This actually happened a few yrs ago. The ACE blew the levee at Hayti,MO on the Miss River where it was mostly farmland.


That's how that particular spillway was designed. They didn't just blow up a regular levee. It was a fuse levee, which is designed to be the first point of failure. Dynamite is just their version of pulling the pins at Bonnet Carre.

The land that got flooded in MO (I think it's bird something spillway) is similar to the land in the spillway here that still has houses and camps. The corps bought surface/flood rights to all the property ~1950-1970's, yet people still use it/ build on it/ farm it, then complain as if they weren't already paid.
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
13440 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 12:38 pm to
Destroying the country's economy
---California, New York, Illinois and Florida say "Not so fast"
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
13440 posts
Posted on 2/15/22 at 12:43 pm to
That was Shaquille O'Neal's 1st day in Baton Rouge because they had a tornado in Baton Rouge that day.
----I don't follow
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram