Started By
Message

re: Is it better to rent or buy a house

Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:17 am to
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
25455 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:17 am to
quote:

The purchaser and renter both have an essential cost. But, stripping out that essential cost, the owner is left with a valuable asset (one that will appreciate over time) and the renter does not


Yes they are.

quote:

That is an investment


No its not, you said it yourself, it's a cost.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:17 am to
quote:

You take the savings from post purchase costs
These costs are, by in large, factored into your rent. It is a myth to assume you aren't paying these costs simply because it isn't a line item in your rent.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
26532 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:19 am to
quote:

cookie cutter suburbia, Keller, and I do mean cookie cutter, there is nothing spectacular about the development I'm in


What's funny, I didn't know you lived in Tx, just taking a stab..

My sister and her husband lived in Denton County and paid about the same..

But hey, the public schools are awesome.. Have to take the good with the bad...

Our property tax goes through Catholic schools...
This post was edited on 7/9/19 at 10:19 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260330 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Sometimes it could be renting and sometimes it could be buying.


Renting makes sense if you're in a flat market and can invest money you would use for a down payment.

For most people though, buying pays off.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:20 am to
quote:

it's a cost
And an investment. Let's say whatever the rent would be for your house is a cost. The small amount you pay in addition to that rent payment then is an investment with a real return in an appreciating asset.
Posted by Logician
Grinning Colonizer
Member since Jul 2013
4512 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:20 am to
quote:

at 19 the house was 95k, today that house lists for 950k

at 21 another house was 45k, today that house is 350k

at 24 another house was 185k, today that house is 675k
I'm finding these numbers incredibly hard to believe, especially the 95k to 950k one.

Where was this, California? And what was the time frame?
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
25455 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:20 am to
quote:

These costs are, by in large, factored into your rent


Not anywhere a near one to one basis. And a renter is a disproportionate advantage on price fluctuations in the market.

quote:

It is a myth to assume you aren't paying these costs simply because it isn't a line item in your rent.


Again, a renter is not paying on a one to one basis. Rent is far more dependent on current market price rather than owners purchase price.
This post was edited on 7/9/19 at 10:21 am
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:26 am to
As an example: I could rent my house or for 1500 per month (probably a little more). My mortgage, taxes and insurance are slightly less than that (let's call it even). So every dollar I spend on maintenance, is an investment in owning an asset that is worth approx $300,000.

Now, as you pointed out, I have additional risk in market fluctuation that a renter doesn't have. That's what comes with investments, risk.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Rent is far more dependent on current market price rather than owners purchase price.
And because real estate generally appreciates, rents generally go up over time, so the property owner is making money on rent and appreciation.
This post was edited on 7/9/19 at 10:30 am
Posted by pizzatiger
Member since Apr 2019
274 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:29 am to
quote:

While true, if you can get close to break even of even only 5 or 10K "loss" after 5 years that's still better than paying $1200 a month in rent x 12 x 5 years for a place to live. But its true that you need to calculate taxes paid yearly, insurance paid yearly, interest payments made lifetime while you owned, closing costs for selling in addition to all of the improvements and maintenance to get your actual "profit" on the house.



But what if I rent and take money that I would have put into a down payment and instead invest in equities/bonds? I will likely get a return on those dollars that I would not get had I used it as equity in a home.

Let's say that's $50k. Someone who put that into the S&P 500 over the past few years would have earned a lot more than the average appreciation in home values.

You could still easily be better off renting at the 5 year mark.
This post was edited on 7/9/19 at 10:30 am
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:30 am to
quote:

. The starting price

single biggest key right there, you have to have a max that you are willing to pay, and a budget/plan already lined out, get in, get out, all within budget, including time frame
This post was edited on 7/9/19 at 10:32 am
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:31 am to
quote:

, the public schools are awesome..


would sting less if I had kids in school here

the school districts take the biggest bite out of property taxes here
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
25455 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:32 am to
quote:

So every dollar I spend on maintenance, is an investment in owning an asset that is worth approx $300,000.


This makes absolutely zero sense
Posted by pizzatiger
Member since Apr 2019
274 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:34 am to
quote:

So every dollar I spend on maintenance, is an investment in owning an asset that is worth approx $300,000.


Not if it doesn't improve the value of the home. It's just a sunk cost. If your AC costs $5k to fix, you lost $5k. Your equity position is unchanged.
This post was edited on 7/9/19 at 10:36 am
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:36 am to
quote:

This makes absolutely zero sense
The cost to own my house (mortgage, taxes, insurance) is roughly the same as it would take to rent it in the market today. This, my investment to own the property, stepping out the essential cost element, is essential the dollars I spend on the property in addition to the mortgage, taxes and insurance.

Not every scenario works this way, but many do.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Not if it doesn't improve the value of the home


another fallacy/misconception that most homeowners have, maintenance of the property is not an improvement or upgrade, if the house needs a new roof, it needs a new roof, a lot of homeowners think they should get back the cost of that roof dollar for dollar, doesn't work that way, adding a pool is considered in the same light by the homeowner, "I just put in a $40k pool!" so the frick what? you wanted the pool, not me, if I buy this dump the first thing I'm going to do is fill it in, that's going to cost me money
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
25455 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:42 am to
quote:

The cost to own my house (mortgage, taxes, insurance) is roughly the same as it would take to rent it in the market today. This, my investment to own the property, stepping out the essential cost element, is essential the dollars I spend on the property in addition to the mortgage, taxes and insurance.


You're arguing against yourself
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
33876 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:51 am to
quote:

would not get had I used it as equity in a home.

Let's say that's $50k. Someone who put that into the S&P 500 over the past few years would have earned a lot more than the average appreciation in home values.

You could still easily be better off renting at the 5 year mark.


Valid. Which is why its all so variable

The only time you win the home owner lottery is owning a property in an area that booms (New Orleans, Austin for currently examples)

Now from a lifestyle standpoint, owning can have its advantages (stability, no moving, able to install things that you like, paint what you like, etc.)
This post was edited on 7/9/19 at 10:56 am
Posted by Gcockboi
Rock Hill
Member since Oct 2012
7689 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:53 am to
I wasted 800 bucks a month for two years renting. That's a shite ton of money that could have been invested. Renting is retarded as frick and for naive broke boi's.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 10:54 am to
quote:

I wasted 800 bucks a month for two years renting. That's a shite ton of money that could have been invested. Renting is retarded as frick and for naive broke boi's.


baw, did you read any of this?
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram