- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/1/23 at 11:53 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
This is actually huge right now...this could certainly give reasonable doubt for AM.
More than reasonable doubt... it's destroying what the prosecution has been trying to get the jury to imply from the hours-long questioning of this phone data witness
Posted on 2/1/23 at 12:06 pm to rt3
The State is now almost trying to undo reasonable doubt, by asking the witness questions that would defend reasonable doubt 
Posted on 2/1/23 at 2:09 pm to IT_Dawg
Defense didn’t even bring up the Snapchat video on cross exam
Posted on 2/1/23 at 2:19 pm to gravy553
quote:
Defense didn’t even bring up the Snapchat video on cross exam
Apparently the video is now on Court TV social feeds
I haven't looked at it but supposedly the only thing you can see on video is the dog & chicken... no humans are seen on the SC video
Posted on 2/1/23 at 2:25 pm to CobraCommander83
Gibson is an Uber Baw
Posted on 2/1/23 at 2:29 pm to rt3
Right, but there are 3 different voices, one being Alex
Posted on 2/1/23 at 2:35 pm to gravy553
quote:
Right, but there are 3 different voices, one being Alex
Yeah... are we sure he was actually there instead of on a speaker phone or something similar?
Posted on 2/1/23 at 2:38 pm to rt3
quote:
Yeah... are we sure he was actually there instead of on a speaker phone or something similar?
Beyond a reasonable doubt.
Posted on 2/1/23 at 2:41 pm to Havoc
Wait... Gibson isn't identifying Alex's voice on the video?
ETA: he did identify Alex... big problem for the defense... cross has to hit this somehow
ETA: he did identify Alex... big problem for the defense... cross has to hit this somehow
This post was edited on 2/1/23 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 2/1/23 at 2:48 pm to rt3
He did. Said he was 99% sure he heard Alex there
Edit: after watching the video he never initially received, he says he’s 100% sure it was Alex
Edit: after watching the video he never initially received, he says he’s 100% sure it was Alex
This post was edited on 2/1/23 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 2/1/23 at 2:50 pm to rt3
quote:
Wait... Gibson isn't identifying Alex's voice on the video?
Wrong. What trial are you watching? You’re such a shill.
Posted on 2/1/23 at 2:50 pm to gravy553
This witness has made the trial much more interesting
This post was edited on 2/1/23 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 2/1/23 at 2:50 pm to gravy553
And 100% in the Snapchat video
Posted on 2/1/23 at 2:54 pm to CobraCommander83
Is it me or during that standup break just now, it looked like Gibson was staring AM down.
Posted on 2/1/23 at 2:56 pm to CobraCommander83
Yep, prayers for this kid
Posted on 2/1/23 at 3:00 pm to CobraCommander83
As a post Morten, Gibson’s testimony certainly makes Paul seem like a good kid aside from his screwups.
Posted on 2/1/23 at 3:29 pm to rt3
quote:
Yeah... are we sure he was actually there instead of on a speaker phone or something similar?
If on speakerphone that would have been reflected in the phone data for he and whoever’s phone he called on.
So just more odd Pro-Murdaugh wishcasting by you.
Posted on 2/1/23 at 3:34 pm to CobraCommander83
These guys on Rekieta (who were awesome during the Rittenhouse trial) are breaking their backs trying to come up with all kinds of pro defense theories. That must be who rt is following.
Posted on 2/1/23 at 5:12 pm to Havoc
And they have adjourned for the day
It became evident that the importance of the Snapchat Videos (plural) needed to have their history of ownership authenticated, going back to the pretrial motions and the bringing of a Snapchat executive from California.
And it wasn't the picture, it was the sound. That two young men both identified AM's voice AT the kennels with his wife and younger son. Contrary to all the statements AM had given earlier. And the other Snapchat video: the one where the recipient remembered AL in long trousers and a shirt, totally not the t shirt and shorts, his outfit when he reported finding the bodies.
It became evident that the importance of the Snapchat Videos (plural) needed to have their history of ownership authenticated, going back to the pretrial motions and the bringing of a Snapchat executive from California.
And it wasn't the picture, it was the sound. That two young men both identified AM's voice AT the kennels with his wife and younger son. Contrary to all the statements AM had given earlier. And the other Snapchat video: the one where the recipient remembered AL in long trousers and a shirt, totally not the t shirt and shorts, his outfit when he reported finding the bodies.
Page 16 of 112
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News