re: If you believe in global warming/climate change, you've been duped.

So bringing product to rural areas doesn't count?

If you want to speak anecdotally, what about Joe farmer who gets 3 amazon packages a week dropped off on his door? Guess that Fedex truck doesn't burn gas right?

Do you have any facts or just funny stories?

quote:

---

So bringing product to rural areas doesn't count?

---

good good. You're right. the local areas in rural environments require large scale industrial farming to support the small populations...

quote:

---

Guess that Fedex truck doesn't burn gas right?

---

if you think gasoline in vehicles is a huge problem you're so misinformed you have no idea what you're talking about.

literally none.

You do realize when they say "fossil fuel combustion" it is actually power plant generation...for electricity...that accounts for between 80 - 90 percent of the CO2 emissions, right?

I mean this is hilarious, you have a new alter and are copy/pastaing again to try and get something right. Good luck.

Not to mention. Spreading people out goes against every intuition on how to make society more efficient. Why would you make millions of people travel individually to acquire a resource when you could bring the resource to the millions of people? This is basic stuff

If cities are so inefficient, why do they continue to grow? Why does 80% of the US population live in urban areas?

quote:

---

Mir will be there as the official knuckle inspector

---

I am OSHA certified to inspect knuckles

I'm the blonde with a facial scar and an LSU t-shirt drinking 40s in the parking lot

And also
here, here, and here.

But we're not talking about facts anymore

One of these guys is a no good dirty lying a-hole and we're gonna find out who the old fashioned way.,. with violence.

Plus, imma get some tater tots

I do water quality shite for a living. I can with 100% certainty tell you that the degradation of overall water quality in rural areas pales in comparison to that of a city. Impervious areas are the driving factor. Vegetation is remarkably good at nutrient uptake and recycling as well as filtering out pollutants before they reach recharge areas.

A city is basically just one enormous fricking point source discharge and the deleterious effects impact entire watersheds. This will improve over time as bioretention and other "green" (smart) infrastructure takes place.. but that costs money and progress is slow.

Agricultural areas contribute heavy nutrient loads to streams.. and that's bad.. and they also tend to frick shite up via agriculture. Ironically.. the commercial Ag. exists to support the cities.. and I'd attribute that injury to the city and not the farmer. Farmers and Ag people catch shite from me all the time but it's because they are backwards and flaunt their protection.. not because they are a main source of pollution. Take a look at your states 303(d) list and then look at their NPDES permits statistics over the last 10 years or so.. (a good indicator of overall impervious area).. and you really won't be able to disagree.

quote:

---

I haven't read all of the bullshite in this thread. Climate change is cyclical. If you think otherwise, you should be living like the

---

I'm going with Mongolian nomad instead because fricking Hawks bro

quote:

---

Mongolian nomad

---

Dude their hawk game is so on point

quote:

---

I'm going with Mongolian nomad instead because fricking Hawks bro

---

These pussy arse people couldn't be Mongolian Nomads. They wouldn't even last 2 days with the Amish...No internet, no way to complain about how evil the US is.