- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/5/17 at 1:51 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
we will take back basketball once and for all
No, we'll just replace basketball with water polo and laugh.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 1:51 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
we will take back basketball once and for all
no more dunks
Posted on 1/5/17 at 1:51 pm to Oddibe
quote:
"Hate Crime" should only be used for non-violent offenses. For example, if some youth paints graffiti on a building and is caught it's basically a small charge, but if that graffiti contains anti-christian sentiment on a church then the punishment should be more stringent.
If someone kills, maims or beats someone up, does it really matter whether it was a "hate" crime or not as long as they are prosecuted to the fullest extent? Remove the subjectivity from the prosecutorial decision.
I feel the opposite on both of these scenarios.
we have free speech so I don't care what people say, post, or tag.
if someone is physical with another than I feel they should be prosecuted to the utmost severity. if the physical assault, murder, etc is harnessed through "hate" it should be worse. try to think of the chicago 4 compared to a guy who got into a bar fight. they aren't quite the same. these 4 are damaged beyond repair
Posted on 1/5/17 at 1:52 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
no more dunks
lower the goal
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:00 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Any "race war" in this country will end very very very badly for one side.
Guess which one.
One race for the majority has everything to lose
The other race as a whole has nothing to lose
so you tell me which one will get the short end of the stick
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:00 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:I agree with you completely, but I don't think "hate" crimes are treated or labeled the same depending on the race committing the crime. Therefore it is not consistent and unless they treat all hate crimes equally they shouldn't label anything as a hate crime.
if someone is physical with another than I feel they should be prosecuted to the utmost severity. if the physical assault, murder, etc is harnessed through "hate" it should be worse. try to think of the chicago 4 compared to a guy who got into a bar fight. they aren't quite the same. these 4 are damaged beyond repair
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:02 pm to LSU_Saints_Hornets
quote:
so you tell me which one will get the short end of the stick
the one with less people, guns, ammo, and the training to handle said weapons.
also black people suck at fighting.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:03 pm to Oddibe
quote:
but I don't think "hate" crimes are treated or labeled the same depending on the race committing the crime. Therefore it is not consistent and unless they treat all hate crimes equally they shouldn't label anything as a hate crime.
I agree. its all in the eyes and mind of whomever is judging them.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:10 pm to LSU_Saints_Hornets
You really think decent hardworking black folk are gonna fight on the side of thugs? That they'll throw everything away for some do-nothings who refused to better themselves and just sat on their arse with their hands out?
Let me tell you what your coalition would be.
A bunch of gangbangers who are used to drive bys and killing innocent bystanders and torturing special needs kids.
A bunch of idiot teens who are gonna run at the first shots back at them.
Some misguided prog idiots who your side will attack whenever it suits them.
You want to go up against an angry bear that's been poked for too long, too often?
A bear armed to the teeth?
A bear that is used to shooting?
Let me tell you what your coalition would be.
A bunch of gangbangers who are used to drive bys and killing innocent bystanders and torturing special needs kids.
A bunch of idiot teens who are gonna run at the first shots back at them.
Some misguided prog idiots who your side will attack whenever it suits them.
You want to go up against an angry bear that's been poked for too long, too often?
A bear armed to the teeth?
A bear that is used to shooting?
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:12 pm to fr33manator
quote:
You want to go up against an angry bear that's been poked for too long, too often?
he don't want none. he will be too busy hiding with gary chambers in a closed Church's
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:16 pm to AnonymousTiger
quote:Wow, one case!
Today. 4 of em.
And only because of public pressure.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:17 pm to bhtigerfan
Not sure why you're rolling your eyes. I answered your question. You didn't ask for a commentary.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:20 pm to AnonymousTiger
quote:Please stop with the snarkasm.
Not sure why you're rolling your eyes. I answered your question. You didn't ask for a commentary.
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:21 pm to LSU_Saints_Hornets
quote:
LOL and y'all think y'all ready for a race war?!
If that were to really happen, United States blacks would be erased in 2 years or less.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:23 pm to bhtigerfan
Answering a question = snarkasm
got it
got it
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:29 pm to AnonymousTiger
quote:Okay.
Answering a question = snarkasm
Before today, when was the last time the DOJ charged a black person for a hate crime against a white person?
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:31 pm to Oddibe
quote:
If someone kills, maims or beats someone up, does it really matter whether it was a "hate" crime or not as long as they are prosecuted to the fullest extent? Remove the subjectivity from the prosecutorial decision.
Should we not acknowledge what the motivation behind the crime is?? Sexual predators, thrill killers, gangland hits, etc .These are all the same. It describes the motivation behind the crime. Hate criminals need to be punished severely for just that. Not all criminals commit crimes out of hate so that term is justified
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:35 pm to Howyouluhdat
quote:
Should we not acknowledge what the motivation behind the crime is?? Sexual predators, thrill killers, gangland hits, etc .These are all the same. It describes the motivation behind the crime. Hate criminals need to be punished severely for just that. Not all criminals commit crimes out of hate so that term is justified
It's ridiculous. You bust a head and the DA wants to prosecute your thoughts?
No slippery slope here. Hate crimes are more Orwellian BS.
Popular
Back to top



0



