- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Has there ever been a communist leader who wasn't a terrible tyrant?
Posted on 9/9/25 at 9:40 am to Darth_Vader
Posted on 9/9/25 at 9:40 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
That’s why communists label anyone who isn’t a communist as “fascist.”
Yep.
Communists are some of the simplest people to lead into a cult. They'll believe anything. No individual values, no individual merit.
0
Posted on 9/9/25 at 9:44 am to OMLandshark
quote:This is a great point. The only way this system can work is with a familial or tribal bond which transcends the perceptions of inequity of contribution. It requires people to willingly contribute a lot of effort.
Communism requires literally everyone to be on the same page and with a willful understanding that some people will be working harder than others to live under the same conditions.
But this cannot be implemented on a large scale without disproportionate use of force to terrorize people into grudgingly contributing.
This is just an evil model for societal organization.
But I saw Gorbachev and Yeltsin as two examples of men who made some efforts to soften this failing system and who tried to integrate the Soviet Union into the rest of the world, so they were not on the same level as Stalin.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 9:44 am to Oilfieldbiology
C.S. Lewis gets shite on nowadays because he was more a theologian than we are used to nowadays, but he has some really good and interesting takes.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 9:45 am to Spankum
quote:
So, in theory, if elections were fair there could potentially be “nice” democratically elected leader over a society with a communistic economic system.
But in reality, it will never work. As I pointed out earlier, the only way communism can function as the ruling party is by squashing all political opposition. And the only way a ruling party can squash all political opposition is when that ruling party has totalitarian levels of power, especially if that ruling party intends to do things like seize people’s personal property or compel them to work at a certain job that person has no interest in working and then handing over to the government the fruits of that work. Most people will reject this unless their compelled to accept it at the end of a rifle.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:00 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
They want utopia and the ideologues truly believe they are on the path to utopia as long as everyone is on the same page.
Yeah, but too bad for these Professor Pygs that people are individuals with individual desires, and someone is going to have to do the hard work. No one wants to be a garbage man, but someone has to do it. These idiots just think they’re not going to work and just paint pictures and smoke pot all day, but they are in for a rude awakening on what communism does.
quote:
Now, those that aren’t ideologues want power, and power alone
No they all want power. They want power over your mind and soul. They’re evil.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:02 am to Cosmo
quote:
Pinochet saved Chile
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:03 am to UFFan
The Marxist concept of communism is idealistic and would be a wonderful way to live. The only problem with it is human nature. Human nature is basically selfish. This is why the Stalinist view of communism has been the prevalent one for governing factions. Because it centralizes power, it will inevitably draw the power-hungry and corrupt. True believers will be pushed aside at the highest level, and you end up with a revolving door of dictators with few, if any, checks and balances.
If there is no incentive to excel, then most do the minimum; a few go above and beyond, and about an equal amount do as little as they can, nothing if possible, without it costing them anything.
If there is no incentive to excel, then most do the minimum; a few go above and beyond, and about an equal amount do as little as they can, nothing if possible, without it costing them anything.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:08 am to UFFan
Good or bad Mao Zedong has made China the powerful country it is today compared to wat it was before.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:08 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Communists are utopians, and utopians are responsible for most of the collective damage done in this world.
I’d say people with excessive pride are, of which communists are more guilty of than anyone. Think about the level of arrogance you have to have to look at the decades and hundreds of millions of corpses (although many of them are even more disgusting than Holocaust deniers thinking it’s all bullshite and everyone in Eastern Europe and China are lying) and think to yourself:
“If only I had been in charge that wouldn’t have happened. If only a genius like me with a sociology and political science degree was there, then it would have been the utopia. Because I’m smarter than Mao, Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot, Castro, and the Kims are and also a better person, and anyone who disagrees with me is a fascist.”
That’s literally how they think. I know communists better than they know themselves.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:16 am to non nobis solum
quote:
Good or bad Mao Zedong has made China the powerful country it is today compared to wat it was before.
No he did not. He murdered tens of millions of his own citizens and put them in uttermost poverty. Pretty much every single Chinese citizen’s life was improved the second Mao dropped dead.
The person who actually made China the powerful country it is today is Deng Xiaoping. He recognized communism for the disaster it was and then turned China from communism to a fascisto-capitalist system. Deng and his successors emulated America and Japan’s market to staggering success.
Mao deserves no credit whatsoever save for meeting with Nixon, and even that was more led by Zhou Enlai than Mao. frick Mao. He was the most evil man who has ever lived.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:17 am to UFFan
The Popes always seem nice, except for the coverups and what not.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:22 am to non nobis solum
quote:
Good or bad Mao Zedong has made China the powerful country it is today compared to wat it was before.
Bizarre take. The dude may have killed over 60 million of his own people.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:25 am to Master of Sinanju
quote:
Stalin was pretty good at being a tyrant
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:25 am to OMLandshark
quote:
And I’d say the actual most competent communist leader was Deng Xiaoping, because he saw communism for the disaster that it was and course corrected:
You'd be right, except that Deng in terms of his economic principles and philosophy was actually more of a fascist. Don't conflate fascism with Nazis. While the Nazis were fascists, they overlaid that with half-made-up pagan religion and BS racial theories.
Fascism is more about state control of the economy through "private" owners, and is closely related to the socialist democracies (a contradiction of terms, but I digress) as they are implemented now in Western Europe. Modern China is probably the closest thing to a pure fascist state in history, with some communist seasoning.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:29 am to TheRealTigerHorn
quote:
You'd be right, except that Deng in terms of his economic principles and philosophy was actually more of a fascist. Don't conflate fascism with Nazis. While the Nazis were fascists, they overlaid that with half-made-up pagan religion and BS racial theories.
Oh I’m aware. Just read my next post about Deng.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:30 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
quote:
Its an adversarial philosophy in which everyone is either a victim or abuser.
That’s why communists label anyone who isn’t a communist as “fascist.”
Which is the height of irony, since the two are closely related and on the same page in many details. They're both supposed to produce a "worker's paradise" with benevolent, wise overlords who rule based on "science", which, as we all know, is "settled".
Their main means of differentiation between the two is hate,
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:34 am to OMLandshark
quote:
quote:
You'd be right, except that Deng in terms of his economic principles and philosophy was actually more of a fascist. Don't conflate fascism with Nazis. While the Nazis were fascists, they overlaid that with half-made-up pagan religion and BS racial theories.
Oh I’m aware. Just read my next post about Deng.
I was just trying to figure out if there was a way to give that post of yours more than one upvote. Nicely done.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:36 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Communism, by its nature, cannot exist as a ruling party without suppression of all political opposition.
Yeah, that tends to happen when you’re implementing a form of government that is counter to human nature.
Posted on 9/9/25 at 10:39 am to UFFan
Huey Long built LSU football
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News