- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Harvey ***Catastrophic Flooding Event***
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:46 pm to LSUFanHouston
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:46 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
I think the 82 crashed set the stage that it was a problem, and got the government thinking about it.
In typical government fashion, though, it took a second incident (the dallas crash) to get the feds off their butts and make it happen.
ETA: there was another crash in NY I think, that was wind shear, but I don't think they really knew that until much later
had my Dallas crashes wrong... it wasn't '88... but rather '85
2 microburst downdraft-caused crashes in 3 years in 2 major US cities
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:50 pm to rt3
I can't believe Delta still uses 191.
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:53 pm to GEAUXmedic
Holy NAM- 969MB on last frame
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:59 pm to tigercraig
Well I know for fricking sure the LANG is getting called. Better start job searching again.
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:01 pm to tigercraig
Just saw the 84hr NAM.
It's ugly. 969 mb's and deepening at the end of the run.
It's ugly. 969 mb's and deepening at the end of the run.
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:01 pm to tketaco
They cant fire you for being activated baw.
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:02 pm to tketaco
Didn't Nash nail the Katrina prediction? Well in advance. ?
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:04 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
They cant fire you for being activated baw.
It has happened. My last job stopped giving me projects because I was gone 6 weeks with AT and BTR flood last year. Then I was let go.
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:06 pm to tketaco
Did you talk to a lawyer about it?
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:11 pm to NorthEndZone
quote:
Nash wasn't always right - nobody is. But what he did do is use his vast knowledge of meteorology to explain all the possibilities and give you his educated most likely scenario of the path and strength to expect. More often than not, he was correct.
Contrast that to looking at a bunch of computer models and trying to justify why your personal favorite is the correct one like many of the so-called experts do today.
He'd be the belowpar of weather threads if he was alive and we got him to post
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:14 pm to OchoDedos
quote:
Just saw the 84hr NAM.
It's ugly. 969 mb's and deepening at the end of the run.
Pay no attention to the NAM.
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:19 pm to Paul Allen
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:20 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
Did you talk to a lawyer about it?
I have pondered it. Im not going to scare away potential employers by coming after them if I am being burden to their projects. Dont think it'll be smart on my part. Got a couple years till I retire then I wont have to worry about it anymore.
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:25 pm to rds dc
While I'd normally say to ignore the NAM, it does a couple things right in this run:
1: establishes the COC further north than other models
2: develops the storm concentricaly instead of gyre style
And just like last night, it could pave the path indicating rapid development in other models. Only time will tell
1: establishes the COC further north than other models
2: develops the storm concentricaly instead of gyre style
And just like last night, it could pave the path indicating rapid development in other models. Only time will tell
This post was edited on 8/22/17 at 10:26 pm
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:26 pm to BigHoss
quote:
It did not, geauxmedic
Do you have confirmation on this? The Dump Data has reccon split b/w 18z and 00z but doesn't have any HDOB. I was wondering the same.
Posted on 8/22/17 at 10:39 pm to rds dc
I'm wondering if it's even in the 00z GFS.
Posted on 8/22/17 at 11:00 pm to dukke v
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/19/21 at 10:32 pm
Posted on 8/22/17 at 11:44 pm to texag7
Let's hope this doesn't come to fruition.
Popular
Back to top


0







