- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Grandpa of teen killed in OK burglary says AR-15 is unfair advantage.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 2:09 pm to Balloon Huffer
Posted on 4/7/17 at 2:09 pm to Balloon Huffer
quote:
If you are in my house, I must assume it is to kill me and my family, I simply won't ask any questions
I agree with this.
quote:
will never feel an iota of remorse.
Have you ever killed anyone before?
1
Posted on 4/7/17 at 2:09 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
Lol the 2nd amendment was kept in part due to fears of a slave revolt.
So no you can't say that.
Learn your history bro #readabook
Posted on 4/7/17 at 2:15 pm to StrongSafety
He'd probably still be Alived. The perps usually aren't trying to kill-- usually they are just trying to take hings that can be replaced -- material things. Nothing an insurance policy or a nice tax payer funded police investigation can't recoup
Posted on 4/7/17 at 2:22 pm to uway
quote:why is this such an unreasonable thing to people
river who is being charged with 3 counts of 1st degree murder
That's an incredibly stupid law.
She had no intention to commit murder and in fact no murder occurred.
if you ask any person "did she commit murder" and they answered yes they'd offer an explanation for their answer unprompted
because on a basic level they know she didn't commit 3 acts of 1st degree murder
Posted on 4/7/17 at 2:23 pm to jchamil
quote:
Did she intend to commit a felony? Was it reasonably foreseeable that someone could die? Did someone die during the commission of that felony? If the answers to those questions are yes, she committed felony murder
Look, kids! An actual example of someone begging the question.
And people upvote that thoughtless circular logic. This is why democracy is doomed: people aren't in general smart enough to make laws.
If they would just stick to natural law we'd be better off, but they can't help themselves now that they've rejected that nature has an author.
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 4/7/17 at 2:25 pm to DelU249
quote:
why is this such an unreasonable thing to people
if you ask any person "did she commit murder" and they answered yes they'd offer an explanation for their answer unprompted
because on a basic level they know she didn't commit 3 acts of 1st degree murder
Just ask them "who was murdered?". They can't answer the question.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 2:32 pm to Lilpickles
quote:
Well if he thinks that AR15 is unfair, they better not have broken in to my house....got enough fire power to take down a small third world country...
No you don't. You just have a small dick.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 2:33 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
I never once thought about calling the cops on them --- the penal system is too harsh on young black boys and they'd probably get oversentence for what is actually a trivial crime in terms of my property (which again can be replaced and fixed. Thankfully I was fortune enough to have the means). That's what held me back the most. Couldn't throw more young black boys into a penal system that punitively punishes them.
quote:
My neighbor saw the vandalism of my car happen and didn't call the cops (a-hole. I was more pissed at him -- couldn't trust him).
You typing those two things back to back in the same post says all anyone needs to know about you.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 2:36 pm to Breesus
I have not, and hope to never have to.
You're right and I'm wrong, I probably would feel remorse.
You're right and I'm wrong, I probably would feel remorse.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 2:46 pm to uway
It's obvious by your attempt to put me down that you don't understand causality, conspiracy, or justice. 3 people are dead out of 4 that planned and entered a house to rob and possibly harm the rightful occupants. By her actions she contributed more to the deaths of the armed perpetrators than the victim defending his home. Who by the way is legally blameless.
I'm sorry you're retarded.
I'm sorry you're retarded.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 2:50 pm to SidewalkDawg
You do realize that picture is Photoshopped right? With that being said it hits the nail on the head though.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 2:58 pm to ZappBrannigan
quote:
's obvious by your attempt to put me down that you don't understand causality, conspiracy, or justice. 3 people are dead out of 4 that planned and entered a house to rob and possibly harm the rightful occupants. By her actions she contributed more to the deaths of the armed perpetrators than the victim defending his home. Who by the way is legally blameless
Who were the murder victims?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 3:02 pm to uway
quote:
She had no intention to commit murder and in fact no murder occurred.
From Wiki (Take it fwiw)
quote:
Texas's felony murder rule, codified in Texas Penal Code § 19.02(b)(3),[1] states that a person commits murder if he "commits or attempts to commit a felony, other than manslaughter, and in the course of and in furtherance of the commission or attempt, or in immediate flight from the commission or attempt, he commits or attempts to commit an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual."
Posted on 4/7/17 at 3:03 pm to uway
quote:
Who were the murder victims?
The three dead teenagers
Posted on 4/7/17 at 3:05 pm to Balloon Huffer
quote:
You're right and I'm wrong,
Posted on 4/7/17 at 3:06 pm to uway
The three males, it was homicide for the defender and felony murder for the getaway driver. It's not complicated. Their blood is on her hands.
Quit acting like the concept of this is new.
Quit acting like the concept of this is new.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 3:06 pm to uway
The reasoning is that you are engaging in conduct which creates a risk of loss of life. When you are committing a violent felony, and such actions create a chain of events where loss of life occurs, why shouldn't you be responsible when that death occurs, regardless of whose life it is?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 3:07 pm to Zach Lee To Amp Hill
Damn AR-15 killing these poor burglars unfairly! We should vandalize shite and set fires....I mean protest! 
Posted on 4/7/17 at 3:14 pm to DatBoilerDude
This case is simple. She should be charged with the deaths of the three dead tPOS because she had a direct hand in the attempted burglary. Do I think she saw/thought this outcome would happen? Absolutely not but ignorance of the law is no justifiable defense.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 3:20 pm to SabiDojo
quote:
The reasoning is that you are engaging in conduct which creates a risk of loss of life. When you are committing a violent felony, and such actions create a chain of events where loss of life occurs, why shouldn't you be responsible when that death occurs, regardless of whose life it is?
She should get a reward for helping get rid of these 3 POSs. She's a hero.
Page 11 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News