Started By
Message

re: Female Elementary School Teacher's Aid charged with you know what..

Posted on 10/18/24 at 7:58 am to
Posted by FootballFrenzy
Chief of the Grammar Police
Member since Oct 2023
9320 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 7:58 am to
quote:

But there is a completely different dynamic when the roles are reversed on some level

Hell no. This is the problem with the entitled-feminist culture, where they get what they want and get away with wrongdoing "because they're women."

That woman could have seriously damaged you. She may not know it, and you may not feel like it, but God will hold her accountable for what she did to you.
This post was edited on 10/18/24 at 9:03 am
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84684 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:03 am to
The state of our society is that there are posters here trying to convince you that you were abused. Even if this was 50 years ago and you loved it then and love the memory of it now lol
Posted by Oates Mustache
Member since Oct 2011
26623 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:09 am to
To put it on a more digestible format for my downvoters, this is a 10th-11th grader targeting a 6th grader for sex. Think about that.
This post was edited on 10/18/24 at 8:10 am
Posted by FootballFrenzy
Chief of the Grammar Police
Member since Oct 2023
9320 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:10 am to
You're up 4-1 on the votes, buddy.
Posted by Oates Mustache
Member since Oct 2011
26623 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:12 am to
quote:

The state of our society is that there are posters here trying to convince you that you were abused


He was. The state of our society is that posters like you want to normalize abuse like this.

I want you to justify to me a 10th-11th grader coaching a 6th grader through sex, multiple times in a row. I'll wait.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84684 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:16 am to
For the word “abuse” to have any meaning, there must be a victim. Scrooster is not a victim, even if you think he needs to be.
Posted by FootballFrenzy
Chief of the Grammar Police
Member since Oct 2023
9320 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:17 am to
quote:

I want you to justify to me a 10th-11th grader coaching a 6th grader through sex, multiple times in a row. I'll wait.

You didn't answer his request, biglego.
Posted by Oates Mustache
Member since Oct 2011
26623 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:19 am to
quote:

For the word “abuse” to have any meaning, there must be a victim. Scrooster is not a victim, even if you think he needs to be.


I've known you to be a reasonable poster here, not sure what your angle is here. So you're one of those people that think because the hardware works, the person is capable of consent? So I guess 9 year old me should have been having rampant sex because my hardware was functioning at that age?
Posted by rexorotten
2314762 posts
Member since Oct 2013
5126 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:19 am to
quote:

He Dad wasn't home


You gay.
Posted by Jimbeaux
Member since Sep 2003
21752 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:24 am to
quote:

There’s more women like her out there than folks realize. And it’s not a new phenomenon.


I’m not so sure about the second part. Tell me what makes you think this phenomenon hasn’t been spiking in the past two decades, cuz it sure seems like it.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84684 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:25 am to
I’m not taking requests. It’s not my burden. My observation is that you and the other guy are trying to convince an old man that he’s a victim with a damaged soul, when the old man is clearly not damaged and very happy with his memories. You never explained why his soul is damaged 50 years later.
It’s your burden to do that.

I’m not going to try to justify a 16 year old getting with a 12 year old. But when the 12 year old is all grown up and is telling us he loved every second of it, well maybe he’s not the victim you need him to be. Kind of weird how invested you are in this.
Posted by Limitlesstigers
Lafayette
Member since Nov 2019
3803 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:27 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/4/25 at 4:58 pm
Posted by FootballFrenzy
Chief of the Grammar Police
Member since Oct 2023
9320 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:27 am to
It's because you're defending something that is wrong on all levels. Scrooster happened to enjoy it and has fond memories of it. That doesn't mean they knew that going in, or that it's the norm. It's not.

I have heard so many stories of boys who lived with the pain and guilt and shame of what was done to them until their dying day. That's what the public needs to think about when they hear stories like this and when they do criminal-justice and sex ed classes, not the occasional case of a kid who had a good time.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84684 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:33 am to
I never said it was the norm. I never said it was a good thing. I do say that Scrooster is not a victim with a damaged soul. I think that’s a pretty shitty thing to say to him. It’s like you’re upset that he’s not upset.
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
26046 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:36 am to
quote:

What would a say 12 year old child have to even do to satisfy a grown woman?!???


The problem is there are some 12 year olds who look like older teens.

There was a case locally where two pubescent 13 year olds were texting about having anal sex (and they were already having sex). The sophistication of the discussion (lubes, relaxing, etc.) was shocking.

Early puberty is an issue.

I have an appointed juvenile case where a 12 year old was accused of rape. He was a little kid. It was a b.s. charge. But, the Judge was not listening to me until they brought the kid into court. He went "oh" and the case was quickly wrapped up with a dismissal.

This post was edited on 10/18/24 at 9:27 am
Posted by Stumpknocker
SWLA
Member since Mar 2021
814 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:38 am to
Former Deridder mayor Misty (aka Moisty) Clanton is watching this development with great interest.
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
16995 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:51 am to
If I was 12 and a 16 year old girl wanted to take advantage of me. You best believe I was gonna try to bust in them guts.

I mean shite in 6th grade I was grabbing arse and trying to flirt with any girl that would talk to me. Most of them were at least 14/15
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
73595 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 8:57 am to
quote:

The state of our society is that there are posters here trying to convince you that you were abused. Even if this was 50 years ago and you loved it then and love the memory of it now lol


He was 12. He was abused. I had the same thing happen to me at that age except the woman who did it to me was eight years older than the one who did it to him. And the thing of it is, I thought I was “lucky” at the time. I thoroughly enjoyed it, even though I knew at the time it was wrong. It wasn’t until several years later when I was grown did I realize the damage she’d done to me. She robbed me of the last few years of my childhood. I’ll never get that back. Women to prey on little boys are no better than men who prey on kids.
Posted by FootballFrenzy
Chief of the Grammar Police
Member since Oct 2023
9320 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 9:02 am to
quote:

do say that Scrooster is not a victim with a damaged soul.

You're right about that part; I didn't mean it that way. I went back and edited it.

But I still think he was a victim.
This post was edited on 10/18/24 at 9:04 am
Posted by Oates Mustache
Member since Oct 2011
26623 posts
Posted on 10/18/24 at 9:04 am to
quote:

damaged soul


You're putting words in my mouth. I said he was abused, which is correct. You're conjuring up imagery to justify your point here.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram