- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FBI officially Investigating California shooting as a act of terrorism
Posted on 12/3/15 at 3:57 pm to biohzrd
Posted on 12/3/15 at 3:57 pm to biohzrd
So do we ever find out the details of exactly what happened, and the motivation behind this? Or in a few days, will it just be accepted as workplace violence/terrorism, and we're all urged to move on? Will this administration truly get to the bottom of this? Or will it be like the dude that shot up the military base?
Posted on 12/3/15 at 3:59 pm to Redbone
Sloppy work by OP. Can we get some cliffs on the first page?
Posted on 12/3/15 at 4:00 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:
Well, they point to this alleged argument before the shooting,
There may have been some altercation but I believe the reason for the attack was due to the reason for the party.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 4:01 pm to Ace Midnight
You are right.. just speculating and still find it convenient that CAIR WAS envolved so quickly. Jesse, Farakhan, and the likes can learn a thing or two.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 4:01 pm to biohzrd
quote:
This means they had contact before the police ever released the name to the public. How does her brother happen to live in the same town when she met him over the internet? This smeels like shite. CAIR probably keeps better records of the Muslims in the area than our own FBI does, and got wind of this shite. Not to mention that CAIR is known to support terrorism.
Wouldn't surprise me in the least if the local imam told the BIL to lawyer up via CAIR. I'm sure all the mosques out there have the local CAIR HQ on speed dial.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 4:03 pm to biohzrd
quote:
find it convenient that CAIR WAS envolved so quickly.
The name was known by authorities - quickly. They used that to run down the residence. Maybe they called the BIL? Or, he heard the initial reports about Farook - called him, couldn't get him, assumed it was him and then called CAIR. "Hey - that's my brother in law they're looking for in SB. What do I do?"
Posted on 12/3/15 at 4:04 pm to Oates Mustache
quote:
I should be so lucky. I lost mine at Chernobyl.
Luxury!
I was boating in the middle of the Sahara when wouldn't you know it, Sarlaac.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 4:05 pm to Ace Midnight
Just like when Clockmed got busted his first call was not to his parents, but to an attorney.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 4:06 pm to fr33manator
Those damn sarlaac's ate Boba Fett too!
Posted on 12/3/15 at 4:56 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
The name was known by authorities - quickly. They used that to run down the residence. Maybe they called the BIL? Or, he heard the initial reports about Farook - called him, couldn't get him, assumed it was him and then called CAIR. "Hey - that's my brother in law they're looking for in SB. What do I do?"
CAIR?
Posted on 12/3/15 at 4:59 pm to nerd guy
Council on American–Islamic Relations
Posted on 12/3/15 at 5:06 pm to Redbone
quote:
There may have been some altercation but I believe the reason for the attack was due to the reason for the party.
Some news is reporting that there was an altercation. Some are saying there was not and he just slipped out.
For whatever my opinion is worth, I think he hit them because they were an incredibly soft target. That being said, he had explosives and could have done more damage with them, following it up with shooting.
It may come out later that he was probably trained in picking his target and making pipe bombs, but not so much in carrying out the attack.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 5:16 pm to Hangit
quote:
Some news is reporting that there was an altercation. Some are saying there was not and he just slipped out.
And he may have used the altercation as a pretext for him to leave.
quote:
For whatever my opinion is worth, I think he hit them because they were an incredibly soft target.
I agree - he selected the target, at the end of the day, because he was completely familiar with all details of it and that it was a large group of people in an open room.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 5:17 pm to Hangit
Where is the third shooter? All of the early eye witnesses said that there were three people dressed in black protective gear. What are we not being told? Who has the baby?
Posted on 12/3/15 at 5:30 pm to fr33manator
i read somewhere that they had GoPros. Where is this footage, if hat is correct?
Posted on 12/3/15 at 5:31 pm to rickyh
No third suspect. Was just someone running during the chaos. Gopros were just a rumor. No gopros
Posted on 12/3/15 at 5:31 pm to rickyh
Baby was left at the grandmother's house. Not established whether there was a third shooter. Eyewitnesses can be unreliable, especially in a chaotic situation.
One of the talking heads yesterday said this could be a hybrid workplace/terrorism incident. Problems on the job made him susceptible to radicalization.
One of the talking heads yesterday said this could be a hybrid workplace/terrorism incident. Problems on the job made him susceptible to radicalization.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 5:32 pm to Jim Rockford
The hybrid stuff is bullshite
Popular
Back to top



0










