- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/11/16 at 9:01 pm to blueboy
quote:
As Reason's Jacob Sullum noted when the Playpen news came out, "the government's position is that children are revictimized every time images of their sexual abuse are viewed or shared," which "is one of the main rationales for punishing mere possession of child pornography," not just those who make or distribute or profit from it. Under federal law, distributing a sexually explicit image of a child comes with a mandatory minimum prison sentence of five years and a possible 20 years."If such actions merit criminal prosecution because they are inherently harmful," Sullum points out, "there is no logical reason why the federal agents who ran The Playpen should escape the penalties they want to impose on the people who visited the site."
That's actually an interesting point.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 9:03 pm to blueboy
I did a very simple image search the other day on Bing and I swear there was a girl about 12 years old naked in the list of images. I hurried and clicked out of it but it made me start to think. Do they put things like that on there to see who will click on it?
Posted on 11/11/16 at 9:14 pm to FelicianaTigerfan
Seems to me you saying you clicked on it by accident would create reasonable doubt. Which is probably why they go after people who actually download the images. A lot harder to claim you did it by accident, especially if there are a lot of them.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 10:49 pm to Jim Rockford
I'll admit. My curiou situ was peaked on why such an image would show up when searching "swine pox". I wanted to go back and see if it would appear again and click on it just to find out how in the hell that would be grouped in with my search but figured it's just better I don't know
Posted on 11/11/16 at 10:57 pm to FelicianaTigerfan
They go after people who actively go to file-sharing sites. You won't finds those kinds of sites on Google.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 11:21 pm to blueboy
Cops that are Christian that look at child porn are going to hell even though it is in their job description to look.
Posted on 11/12/16 at 8:20 am to biglego
quote:some sites, yes. Others actually have undercover cops, dressed like children (usually with a propeller hat) with their dicks hanging out.
sounds like the FBI is dealing in actual kiddie porn
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:51 am to Peepdip
quote:"Well, I thought that was a 35 year old man, but that propeller hat. I don't know."
some sites, yes. Others actually have undercover cops, dressed like children (usually with a propeller hat) with their dicks hanging out.
Posted on 11/12/16 at 10:20 am to blueboy
Porn has been proven to become an addiction. We have agents in the FBI viewing kiddie porn. The FBI is creating kiddie porn addicts.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News